Wyatt Teller and Jack Conklin active, Josh Dobbs inactive – NBC Sports

  1. Wyatt Teller and Jack Conklin active, Josh Dobbs inactive  NBC Sports
  2. Ben Roethlisberger: 2 milestones to watch for today vs. Cleveland Browns  Steelers Wire
  3. Browns vs. Steelers preview: Everything you need to know ahead of the wild card game  cleveland.com
  4. Browns vs. Steelers Wild Card playoff prediction, odds, pick, and more  ClutchPoints
  5. Steelers’ Ike Taylor Piles On Browns After JuJu Shade, ‘This Ain’t No Damn Rivalry’  TMZ
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Source: Google News, Wyatt Teller and Jack Conklin active, Josh Dobbs inactive – NBC Sports

BREAKING: Pelosi Gives Pence 24hrs To Activate 25th Amendment

WASHINGTON — Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi on Sunday called on Vice President Mike Pence to invoke the 25th Amendment.

The announcement comes as a growing number of Congressmembers have called for President Donald Trump to be removed from office.

Below is the text of a letter Pelosi sent to her Democrat collogues:

Dear Democratic Colleague,

On this Sunday, as we pray that God will continue to Bless America, I write to inform you of our next actions, which will be made with the great solemnity that this moment requires.

I want to call to your immediate attention the action to be taken tomorrow morning, when Majority Leader Hoyer will request Unanimous Consent to bring up the Raskin resolution. This resolution calls on the Vice President to convene and mobilize the Cabinet to activate the 25th Amendment to declare the President incapable of executing the duties of his office, after which the Vice President would immediately exercise powers as acting President. 

If we do not receive Unanimous Consent, this legislation is planned to be brought up on the Floor the following day. We are calling on the Vice President to respond within 24 hours.

Next, we will proceed with bringing impeachment legislation to the Floor.

In protecting our Constitution and our Democracy, we will act with urgency, because this President represents an imminent threat to both. As the days go by, the horror of the ongoing assault on our democracy perpetrated by this President is intensified and so is the immediate need for action.

I look forward to our Caucus call tomorrow. I am grateful to all Members for the suggestions, observations and input that you have been sending. Your views on the 25th Amendment, 14th Amendment Section 3 and impeachment are valued as we continue. I am answering your communications in chronological order and will do so into the night.

Thank you for your patriotism.

The post BREAKING: Pelosi Gives Pence 24hrs To Activate 25th Amendment appeared first on Breaking911.

Source: Breaking 911, BREAKING: Pelosi Gives Pence 24hrs To Activate 25th Amendment

Pilot threatens to 'dump' Trump fans in Kansas after they start chanting 'USA' on his flight

Two days after what began as a pro-Trump protest ended up with rioting at the U.S. Capitol, one American Airlines pilot made it clear he had had his fill of Trump supporters.

The flight from Washington to Phoenix turned into a mini-Trump rally as passengers waited to leave D.C. behind, according to a video tweeted by Mindy Robinson, who lost her race for Congress in November.

“Wow. I’m on a plane full of patriots flying from DC to Phoenix and we started chanting “USA” …and the Captain came on said told us he’d drop us off in Kansas if he had to if we didn’t obey their every single rule. American Airlines is everything but America,” she tweeted, including a video of the chanting.

Although most people in the video are shown from the back, many appear to be maskless.

A second video from the flight records the cockpit’s ultimatum to the passengers..

“This is how an airline pilot from DC to Phoenix just responded to a plane full of Patriots chanting USA. If you don’t think they’re after our freedoms, you’re fooling yourself,” Pastor Greg Locke tweeted.

On the brief video, a very exasperated pilot warns the passengers to chill — or else.

“I’ll put this plane down in the middle of Kansas and dump people off, I don’t care,” he said.

“We will do that if that’s what it takes so, behave please.”

An airline spokesperson said the pilot was “emphasizing the importance of following crew member instructions and complying with mandatory face-covering policies,” according to the New York Post.

“At American, we take the safety of our customers seriously and we value the trust they place in our team to care for them throughout their journey,” the spokesperson said.

The spokesperson said that there were no “in-flight issues” after the plane took off.

The incident took place one day after Sara Nelson, president of the Association of Flight Attendants, said anyone who participated in the rioting and protests should be banned from flying, according to the New York Post.

“Acts against our democracy, our government and the freedom we claim as Americans must disqualify these individuals from the freedom of flight,” she said.

“The mob mentality behavior that took place on several flights to the DC area yesterday was unacceptable and threatened the safety and security of every single person onboard.”

This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.

The post Pilot threatens to ‘dump’ Trump fans in Kansas after they start chanting ‘USA’ on his flight appeared first on WND.

Source: WND Politics, Pilot threatens to ‘dump’ Trump fans in Kansas after they start chanting ‘USA’ on his flight

"A Huge Reversal" – Louis Gave Warns "Inflation Will Come Back With A Vengeance"

“A Huge Reversal” – Louis Gave Warns “Inflation Will Come Back With A Vengeance”

Authored by Mark Dittli via TheMarket.ch,

Louis-Vincent Gave, CEO and co-founder of Gavekal Research, sees a dramatic paradigm shift playing out in the world economy. In this in-depth conversation, he explains how investors should position themselves for the future.

Louis-Vincent Gave is a master of the big picture. The co-founder of Hong Kong-based research boutique Gavekal is one of the most esteemed writers about geopolitical and macroeconomic developments and their impact on financial markets.

In this in-depth conversation with The Market NZZ, Mr. Gave shares his views on the Dollar, stock markets, oil and gold prices – and he explains why the United States are starting to act like a «sick emerging market».

Mr Gave, 2020 has been a catalyst for some big shifts in the global investment environment. Looking into the future, what are the biggest topics for you?

I’ve spent most of my career in Asia, so my lens is fundamentally biased towards Asia. With that disclaimer, I would say this: When the Covid crisis started, the view in the West was that this would be China’s Chernobyl Moment. That they completely screwed up, which would eventually weaken the regime. Fast forward to today, and China comes out of this looking much better than most Western countries. If there is one big divergence in the world, it is this: In most Western countries, the population is angry at how their government dealt with the pandemic, either because they think the government did too much or too little. But in China, there is a feeling that there were two big crises in the past 15 years, the Global Financial Crisis in 2008 and now Covid, and China in both cases came out ahead of the West. Most of Asia actually came out of this much better than the Western world.

What else do you see?

When I look at markets, there are three key prices in the world economy: Ten year Treasury yields, oil, and the Dollar. One year ago, yields were going down, oil was going down, and the Dollar was going up. Today, Treasury yields are going up, oil is going up, and the Dollar is going down. This is a huge reversal. When I see a market where interest rates are rising and the currency is falling, alarm bells go off.


This is what you would see in a sick emerging market. If you’re invested in, say, Indonesia, rising interest rates and a falling currency is a signal that investors are getting out, because they don’t like the policy setting there. Today, the US is starting to act like a sick emerging market. We even have a question mark over whether they have the ability to run a fair election. Suffice to say that at least 30% of Americans believe their election system is rigged. This is mindblowing.

What’s the policy setting investors don’t like in the US?

Government debt in the US has increased by more than $4 trillion this year, which adds up to $12,800 per person. This is a world record, but actually most Western governments have gone on a massive spending spree during this crisis. In a way, they’re using the playbook that China followed after 2008, when they allowed a massive increase in fiscal spending and monetary aggregates. Today, Beijing sits on its hands in terms of fiscal and monetary policy, while the West knows no limits.

They’re doing it to soften the blow of the pandemic. What’s wrong with that?

When China did this in 2008, they funded massive infrastructure projects: airports, railroads, roads, ports, you name it. Some of these projects turned out to be productive and some not, but I always thought they would be definitely more productive than social transfers. But this year, the debt buildup in the US has funded zero new productive investments. No new roads, no airports, railroads, nothing. They were basically just sending money to people to sit at home and watch TV. In the end, this buildup of unproductive debt can be reflected in one of two things: Either in the cost of funding for the government, i.e. in rising interest rates, or in a devaluation of the currency. This is what the French economist Jacques Rueff taught us years ago. Very soon, this is going to put the Fed in a quandary.

In what way?

They will have to decide whether to let bond yields rise or not. If they let them normalize to pre-Covid levels, 10-year Treasury yields would have to rise to about 2.5%. But if they do that, the funding of the government becomes problematic. A 50 basis point increase in interest rates is equivalent to the annual budget for the U.S. Navy. Another 30 bp is the equivalent for the U.S. Marines, and so on. The U.S. is already borrowing money to pay its interest today. If rates go up, they’re getting into the cycle where they have to borrow more just to be able to pay interest, which is not a good position.

Do you expect the Fed to move in and cap interest rates?

Yes, I do. And when they do, I’d say the Dollar will take a 20% hit.

Ten year Treasuries currently yield around 0.95%. At what level will the Fed step in?

I think they will have to cap interest rates at 2%, otherwise the drag on the government will become too big. That question will arise rather soon, because come this spring, the base effects for growth and for inflation will kick in. Growth will be very strong, and so will inflation, which means that yields will quickly try to get back up to 2%.

You recently wrote a piece where you recommended buying gold and financials to prepare for this event. Why gold, and why financials?

My base case is that Treasury yields will move up to around 2%, at which point the Fed will introduce some variant of yield curve control. In this case, the Dollar would tank, real interest rates would drop and gold would thrive. But maybe I’m wrong, maybe the Fed freaks out when they see inflation rising to 4%, and maybe they decide to let yields rise. If that’s the case, then financials will rip higher, driven by a steeper yield curve. So come this spring, if the Fed caps interest rates, gold will thrive, and if it doesn’t, financials will thrive.

But you’d lean towards gold?

Yes. It’s quite possible that in the coming weeks, the Dollar will rise while Treasury yields move up. This could provoke a sell-off in gold. If that were to happen, I’d take the other side of that trade, I would buy gold. But at the same time, you can buy out of the money call options on financials. That would be the hedge for the scenario of the Fed changing its mind and letting the yield curve steepen.

The Dollar has been strong for the past ten years. Has it entered a new structural bear market?

Yes, there is no doubt in my mind. A year ago, the Dollar was the only major currency offering positive real rates. My view is that capital flows into positive real rates, just like water flows downhill. Today, the U.S. has one of the most negative real interest rates worldwide. Given the year-on-year rise we will see in inflation this spring, real interest rates in the U.S. will drop even further.

Apart from negative real yields, what are the other reasons for the Dollar bear market?

We first have to ask ourselves why we even had a Dollar bull market in the past decade. The answer is the shale oil revolution. As the United States moved towards energy independence after 2011, its trade deficit shrank. The shale oil revolution meant that all of a sudden, the U.S. was no longer exporting money.

And that tide has now turned?

Yes. Oil production in the U.S. is collapsing. The Texan wildcatters have lost out in the price war against the Saudis and the Russians. U.S. oil production has already gone down 2.5 million barrels per day and is slated to go down by another 2.5 million over the next twelve months, because every major oil company is cutting capital expenditures. Just look at Chevron and Exxon, their capital spending plans over the next five years are at half the level they were in 2014. And so, as the U.S. economy picks up after Covid, America will be importing oil on a massive scale again. The U.S. will be back to exporting $100 to $120 billion to the rest of the world, mostly to places that don’t like America, who will turn around and sell those Dollars for Euros. This is bearish for the Dollar.

When we see the oil price heading above $50 again, wouldn’t that cause US production to rise?

You can’t turn up oil production like a tap. It will take at least a couple of years to come back. Plus, shale oil production in the U.S. was hugely capital destructive. More than $350 billion was lost in the shale oil patch over the past ten years. Look at the energy sector today, it’s at 2.5% of the S&P 500. When oil was at $10 per barrel, back in 1999, energy was 5.5% of the S&P 500. So I’m going to answer your question with another question: If oil prices go up, and the U.S. could produce more oil again, it would require hundreds of billions of Dollars in capex. Who will provide that kind of capital, with an incoming Democratic Administration that has been ambivalent about fracking? I don’t see it.

So we are moving back into a world where the U.S. is a structural oil importer and a Dollar exporter?

Yes. The seeds are planted. That’s a huge shift that I don’t think people are taking into account yet.

When the world economy normalizes after the pandemic, where will the oil price settle?

Before Covid, it seemed that the oil market had found a balance between 60 and 80 $ per barrel.

Is that the range we’ll head back to?

I think so, and for a pretty simple reason: Above 80 $, China basically stops buying. That’s a big difference relative to ten to fifteen years ago, when China hadn’t built any sizeable inventory and was a forced buyer of oil. This is no longer the case. In fact, you saw it during the Covid crisis: Between April and June, when the oil price collapsed, China imported about 13 million barrels per day, which was 40% more than normal. Clearly, they were building up inventory, taking advantage of the low price. China is the marginal buyer, and its behaviour is a key driver for the oil price: Above 80 $ they stop buying, and below 60 $ they buy in size. Incidentally, in that range, many oil companies make pretty decent money. Saudi Aramco makes a killing at this price level.

You see the Dollar in a bear market. Meanwhile, the Renminbi has strengthened significantly. Is that also a structural shift?

I think so. In the past, every time there was a crisis, the reaction of the People’s Bank of China was to freeze the exchange rate. During and after the global financial crisis, the RMB flatlined against the Dollar at 6.82 for two years. In 2015, when the Chinese equity bubble burst, the RMB was flat for several months. When things went bad, historically, they froze it. Not this year. This year, we saw the sharpest six month RMB rally in history. That is a clear change in policy.

What’s behind that change?

I don’t know, but the facts are clear. China today is the only major economy in the world that offers large positive real interest rates. Thus, capital flows into the Chinese bond market. The PBoC is the only major central bank publicly saying they won’t destroy their currency and they won’t proceed to the euthanasia of the rentier. The consequences of this are hugely important. A strong RMB is a fundamentally inflationary force for the world economy.

How so?

Manufacturers around the world have to compete with Chinese producers. Therefore, a weak RMB drives prices down, whereas a strong RMB drives prices up. You can compare it to the role of the Yen forty years ago. A stronger RMB means stronger consumption in China and Asia, and it means that whatever we buy from China is going up in price. It’s not surprising that as the RMB rerates, the U.S. yield curve steepens and oil prices go up: It’s all part of the same reflationary backdrop.

Given this backdrop: Do you see a return of structural inflation in Western economies?

Yes, I think inflation will come back with a vengeance. One of the key deflationary forces in the past three decades was China. I wrote a book about that in 2005; I was a deflationist then, as my belief was that every company in the world would focus on what they can do best and outsource everything else to China at lower costs. But now, we’re in a new world, a world that I outlined in my last book, Clash of Empires, where supply chains are broken up along the lines of separate empires. Let me give you a simple example: Over the past two years, the US has done everything it could to kill Huawei. It’s done so by cutting off the semiconductor supply chain to Huawei. The consequence is that every Chinese company today is worried about being the next Huawei, not just in the tech space, but in every industry. Until recently, price and quality was the most important consideration in any corporate supply chain. Now we have moved to a world where safety of delivery matters most, even if the cost is higher. This is a dramatic paradigm shift.

And this paradigm shift will be a key driver for inflation?

Yes. It adds up to a huge hit to productivity. Productivity is under attack from everywhere, from regulation, from ESG-investors, and now it’s also under attack from security considerations. This would only not be inflationary if on the other side central banks were acting with restraint. But of course we know that central banks are printing money like never before.

What will that mean for investors?

First, there will be two kinds of countries going forward: countries that massively monetized the Covid shock and those that did not. I’d compare the picture to the late 1970s, where countries like the U.S., the U.K. or France monetized the oil price shock, while Japan, Germany and Switzerland did not. This led to a huge revaluation of the Yen, the Deutschmark and the Swiss Franc. Today, the Fed and the ECB were among the central banks that massively monetized, while many central banks in Asia did not. So I expect a big revaluation of Asian currencies over the coming five years, which in itself is inflationary for the world. If you look at the U.S. today, inventories are at record lows. With the economy improving in 2021, companies will have to restock, and they will have to restock with a falling Dollar. The Dollar is down 20% to the Mexican Peso over the past six months, down 10% to the Korean Won, down 8% to the RMB, so whatever Americans buy from abroad will be more expensive. Countries with weak currencies, the U.S. first among them, will have higher inflation.

Where will inflation rates settle?

I don’t know. There is the idea among central bankers that they can engineer inflation rates around 2.5% and keep them there. I doubt that this will be possible to control. But just for the sake of it, let’s assume they manage to do what they say, that they are the perfect engineers they think they are and get inflation at 2.5% for the next five years. Why on Earth would you want to own Treasuries at 0.9% or German Bunds at below zero? You don’t even have to get to a scenario where inflation accelerates to 4 or 5% to see that bonds are madness today. Even if central banks just manage to do what they say, you are guaranteed to lose money with bonds.

What should investors do to position themselves in this new world?

In the old world, where interest rates were falling, the Dollar was strong and oil was weak, you bought Treasuries and U.S. growth stocks and went to the beach. Now, the world has changed. This means you have to stay away from bonds and U.S. growth stocks. In a world of Dollar weakness, you buy emerging market equities and debt, and within emerging markets, I prefer Asia. In a world where either the yield curve will steepen or the Dollar will collapse, either financials or the commodities sector will be doing well. Everything seems to point towards commodities, including energy, but as mentioned, I’d still buy financials as a hedge against a steepening yield curve. So, in a nutshell: Buy value stocks, buy the commodities sector, and buy emerging markets. And for the antifragile part of your portfolio, buy RMB bonds and gold.

How about Japan?

Absolutely, Japan is in a stealth bull market, it has been very strong, and nobody talks about it. We never get questions on Japan from clients. I’m a big bull on Japan, it’s not a crowded trade, so I feel comfortable in it. In a world that is reflating, Japan typically does well. And in this unfolding new Cold War between the U.S. and China, Japanese industrial companies are well positioned.

Aren’t you a bit early in writing off big U.S. tech?

Growth stocks have had their run in the past ten years, with falling bond yields and a rising Dollar. In a reflationary world, they will underperform. Plus, tech is the main battleground in the war between the U.S. and China. I see the tech world breaking into three separate zones, one dominated by America, one dominated by China and India evolving into a zone by itself. You can own the champions in each zone, which means you can own Amazon or Google for the West, or Tencent in China. In danger are companies that straddle the two worlds. Huawei tried, and we saw it being killed. I see Apple at risk, too. I know I said this to you a year ago, and I turned out to be completely wrong, but I still think Apple is in danger, as it straddles the U.S. and Chinese tech spheres.

In the middle of this tech war sits Taiwan. What are your thoughts about Taiwan and the semiconductor industry?

Taiwan today is what Alsace-Lorraine was 120 years ago. There were two hugely important events this year that most people have missed because of the Covid crisis. One, the market value of the global semiconductor industry has moved above the market value of the global energy sector. The market is telling us that semiconductors are more important than energy; they are the commodity of the future. We should think of Taiwan the way we used to think of Saudi Arabia.

What’s the second important event?

At the end of 2019, the market value of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing was $200 billion, while the market value of Intel was $350 billion. Today, TSMC is $450 billion, while Intel has dropped to $200 billion. Why? This summer, TSMC came out and said they can produce 7 nanometer chips and will be able to produce 3nm chips in 2023. A week later, Intel came out and said they won’t be able to produce 7nm chips by 2021. So in the summer of 2020, we witnessed the passing of the technological baton from Intel to TSMC. The leadership in the semiconductor industry now belongs to Taiwan.

Why does this matter?

It matters because Washington has decided to make semiconductors the battleground in its war against China. And that means that Taiwan is the battleground in the great conflict of the 21st Century, an island that Beijing regards as a renegade province, sitting 60 miles from its shore. Taiwan has always been a sore point between China and the U.S., even when Taiwan produced plastic toys and bicycles. Imagine if Saudi Arabia was a political uncertainty between America and China, where the regime depended on Washington for survival, but the territory was claimed by China. We’d be very worried.

How will that conflict play out?

I don’t know what will happen. But I’d just say that the fact that the Trump Administration decided to make semiconductors the battleground in its fight with China strikes me as extremely dangerous, given the fact that the U.S. has just lost the technology leadership baton to Taiwan. That, to me, will be the most important event in 2020, more important than Covid.

Tyler Durden
Sun, 01/10/2021 – 18:45

Source: Zero Hedge, “A Huge Reversal” – Louis Gave Warns “Inflation Will Come Back With A Vengeance”

Baltimore Ravens' celebration on Tennessee Titans' logo about 'team unity' not disrespect – ESPN

  1. Baltimore Ravens’ celebration on Tennessee Titans’ logo about ‘team unity’ not disrespect  ESPN
  2. Analytics say Mike Vrabel made worst punting decision of season vs. Ravens  Yahoo Sports
  3. Mike Preston’s report card: Position-by-position grades for Ravens’ 20-13 wild-card win over Titans | COMMENTARY  Baltimore Sun
  4. Marcus Spears is reeling about Derrick Henry’s game against the Ravens | SportsCenter  ESPN
  5. Ravens at Titans odds, expert picks: Point spread, total, player props, trends, how to watch wild-card game  CBS Sports
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Source: Google News, Baltimore Ravens’ celebration on Tennessee Titans’ logo about ‘team unity’ not disrespect – ESPN

JPMorgan and Citigroup join U.S. corporations halting political donations after Capitol riot – CNBC

  1. JPMorgan and Citigroup join U.S. corporations halting political donations after Capitol riot  CNBC
  2. Goldman, JPMorgan, Citi Suspend Political Donations  Bloomberg
  3. Capitol riot, votes against Electoral College certification prompt businesses to pause political donations  Fox Business
  4. Capitol Riot Prompts Some Big Banks and Companies to Pause Political Funding  The Wall Street Journal
  5. Businesses rethink political donations after Capitol siege  KARK
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Source: Google News, JPMorgan and Citigroup join U.S. corporations halting political donations after Capitol riot – CNBC

Army identifies more possible threats after at least 25 ‘domestic terrorism’ cases opened in connection with US Capitol breach

Prosecutors have opened at least 25 domestic terrorism cases against people who participated in the US Capitol riot, and the Army has identified more potential threats as President-elect Joe Biden’s inauguration approaches.

US Representative Jason Crow (D-Colorado) said he was updated on the status of riot-related prosecutions by Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy. Rifles, Molotov cocktails, explosives and zip-tie handcuffs were recovered during the arrests, suggesting that “a greater disaster was narrowly averted,” Crow said.

The Army is aware of additional domestic terrorism threats in the days leading to Biden’s January 20 inauguration and is coordinating with local and federal law enforcement agencies on security preparations, Crow said. The congressman added that he’s afraid members of the military may be involved in insurrection and he asked McCarthy to review deployments for the inauguration to ensure there are no troops “sympathetic to domestic terrorists.”

Also on rt.com

The US Capitol grounds in Washington, DC, January 8, 2021.
Media & Democrats are launching second ‘war on terror’ – against Americans – Glenn Greenwald warns

Eric Gavelek Munchel, 30, was among those arrested and charged on Sunday. He was suspected of being the man shown in social-media video footage in the Senate press gallery with zip-tie handcuffs and a weapon, according to a Department of Justice statement. He was booked into the Nashville jail on Sunday afternoon and faces one count of knowingly entering restricted property without lawful authority and one count of violent entry and disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds.

Larry Rendell Brock of Texas also was arrested Sunday on the same charges. Prosecutors said he was identified as wearing a green helmet and tactical vest with patches. He was allegedly holding white flex cuffs, which like zip-ties, can be used to restrain or detain a person.

Supporters of President Donald Trump traveled to Washington last week to protest Congressional certification of Biden’s electoral victory on Wednesday. Democrats have blamed Trump, who alleged that the election was stolen from him through massive fraud, for inciting the Capitol assault.

The Capitol break did bring about a wall – just not the one Trump was trying to build on the nation’s southern border. McCarthy announced Thursday that a non-scalable fence would be erected around the Capitol and would be left up for at least 30 days.

Also on rt.com

Supporters of Donald Trump protest the certification of the 2020 US presidential election results in Washington, DC, January 6, 2021 © Reuters / Jim Bourg
Worse than Benghazi? Prosecutors say they’ll track down rioters, as liberals compare Capitol riot to Libyan debacle

Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!

Source: RT, Army identifies more possible threats after at least 25 ‘domestic terrorism’ cases opened in connection with US Capitol breach

The Memo: GOP and nation grapple with what comes next | TheHill – The Hill

  1. The Memo: GOP and nation grapple with what comes next | TheHill  The Hill
  2. President Trump banned from Twitter, faces possible second impeachment  CBS Evening News
  3. Pelosi: House ‘will proceed’ to impeachment of Trump  WLS-TV
  4. The pro-Trump Republican freshmen who joined Josh Hawley’s election crusade  NBCNews.com
  5. President could face second impeachment  WWLTV
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Source: Google News, The Memo: GOP and nation grapple with what comes next | TheHill – The Hill

San Francisco braces for possible pro-Trump demonstration at Twitter headquarters on Monday – San Francisco Chronicle

  1. San Francisco braces for possible pro-Trump demonstration at Twitter headquarters on Monday  San Francisco Chronicle
  2. Stripped of Twitter, Trump Faces a New Challenge: How to Command Attention  The New York Times
  3. Rebecca Grant: Trump vs Twitter & Facebook: What’s really behind feud that banned Trump from sites?  Fox News
  4. Trump’s Twitter ban renews calls for tech law changes by many who don’t get tech or the law  NBCNews.com
  5. It’s still Donald Trump’s party  Washington Post
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Source: Google News, San Francisco braces for possible pro-Trump demonstration at Twitter headquarters on Monday – San Francisco Chronicle

New River Valley among regions to start next wave of coronavirus vaccinations – WSET

  1. New River Valley among regions to start next wave of coronavirus vaccinations  WSET
  2. First Covid-19 vaccines doses arrive in Jordan  The National
  3. When should people who’ve already gotten COVID-19 get the vaccine? Doctors say it depends on whether they still have symptoms.  Yahoo News
  4. How vaccinated grandparents should approach visiting loved ones now — advice from Dr. Wen  CNN
  5. Tompkins County to begin vaccination phase 1B on Jan. 11  ithaca.com
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Source: Google News, New River Valley among regions to start next wave of coronavirus vaccinations – WSET

Trump to award Bill Belichick the Medal of Freedom amid House impeachment push – POLITICO

  1. Trump to award Bill Belichick the Medal of Freedom amid House impeachment push  POLITICO
  2. Lawmakers warn new Trump impeachment could overshadow Biden’s first days  Washington Post
  3. Readers sound off on competing perspectives, agitator rumors and a Trump removal  New York Daily News
  4. Opinion | Impeachment Would Defend Congress Against Trump  The New York Times
  5. Opinion | Democrats Are Pursuing the Wrong Impeachment Charges Against President Trump  POLITICO
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Source: Google News, Trump to award Bill Belichick the Medal of Freedom amid House impeachment push – POLITICO

Hopes pinned on Congress to halt Biden's tax 'vision'

[Editor’s note: This story originally was published by Real Clear Markets.]

By John Tamny
Real Clear Markets

If he sticks to his campaign promises, president-elect Joe Biden will soon pursue tax increases on top earners. Unknown is how helpful a near-evenly divided Congress will be when it comes to turning his vow into law.

More certain is what entrepreneurs of the Silicon Valley variety, and who tend to lean Democrat, will tell the new president. Some will undoubtedly encourage the hikes. When told by President Obama in 2011 that he should expect an increased federal income tax burden, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg famously replied “I’m cool with that.”

It’s not unreasonable to speculate that Zuckerberg meant what he said. Tax rates, whether high or low, arguably don’t factor into Zuckerberg’s decisions about how much or how little to work. If your goal is to build a global social network, you don’t check the tax rates first.

Just the same, does anyone think the tax increases enacted in 1993 under Bill Clinton factored much into Jeff Bezos’s decision to start Amazon in 1995? It’s unlikely, at which point it’s not unreasonable to suggest that Bezos’s work ethic similarly isn’t altered by tax policy from Washington.

The enterprising quite simply can’t not work. Though taxes are an unfortunate price or penalty placed on work, it’s no reach to say that willingness to put in long hours among the seriously entrepreneurial dwarfs that of the typical person getting out of bed each morning. Entrepreneurs who stare bankruptcy in the face on a daily basis as they bring to life their often-ridiculed visions generally don’t have time to lament reduced encouragement from the tax code. Better yet, income tax rates often don’t matter much to them as is.

Consider Nike co-founder Phil Knight. In his endlessly great 2016 memoir, Shoe Dog, Knight recalls that he didn’t have the means to pay himself a salary for the first five years of Blue Ribbon’s (Nike, before Nike) existence. And once he did? The pay was $18,000 annually.

About what’s been written, none of it should be construed as a call for higher tax rates. Not at all. It’s really meant to show how the enterprising who support Biden might dismiss the negative impact of higher rates of taxation to the new president. They’re “cool” about more taxes either because they’re too manically devoted to their visions to care about how they’re taxed, or their compensation isn’t income-based to begin with.

Of course, their reasoning misses the point. Indeed, it’s what Biden’s well-to-do supporters won’t tell him that matters most. Tax cuts aren’t just about work incentives.

Specifically, entrepreneurs can’t innovate without capital. No economic school of thought can evade this simple truth. Entrepreneurial concepts are just concepts without investment. Which is why tax rates matter a great deal to innovative endeavor. Knight’s experience is instructive in this regard.

Working capital in Nike’s early days was always incredibly difficult to access. In Knight’s words, “I spent most of every day thinking about liquidity, talking about liquidity, looking into the heavens and pleading for liquidity.” Entrepreneurs, by virtue of being entrepreneurs, are in a constant – and often fruitless – battle for always limited capital.

No doubt it’s true that many in Silicon Valley don’t recoil from higher tax rates, but they’re leaving out how essential access to capital is. This is where the importance of low-income tax rates on the highest earners comes in. Simply stated, capital availability is a direct consequence of reduced taxation on those with the most.

That is so because the rich are most likely to have unspent wealth left over after meeting their individual consumptive needs. When their excess isn’t taxed at exorbitant rates, the well-to-do really have no choice but to save and invest it. A growing capital base is the friend of those with abundant vision, but limited ability to vivify it. As Knight explained it, every “dollar that wasn’t nailed down I was plowing directly into the business.”

The more investment that’s available, the better the odds for the intrepid among us. Conversely, the more that wealth is taxed, the more that what’s left over must be more carefully put to work to the detriment of the pioneers eager to alter the business landscape.

Looking ahead to 2021, the hope is that Congress will prove an insurmountable barrier to Biden’s taxation vision. Barring that, it’s useful to remember that tax increases are much more than a work disincentive. Arguably their worst quality is that they limit altogether the happy process whereby the energetic are matched with capital in the first place.

John Tamny is editor of RealClearMarkets, Vice President at FreedomWorks, and a senior economic adviser to Toreador Research and Trading (www.trtadvisors.com). His next book, set for release in March of 2021, is titled When Politicians Panicked: The New Coronavirus, Expert Opinion, and a Tragic Lapse of Reason. Other books by Tamny include They’re Both Wrong: A Policy Guide for America’s Frustrated Independent Thinkers, The End of Work, about the exciting growth of jobs more and more of us love, Who Needs the Fed? and Popular Economics. He can be reached at jtamny@realclearmarkets.com.  

[Editor’s note: This story originally was published by Real Clear Markets.]


The post Hopes pinned on Congress to halt Biden’s tax ‘vision’ appeared first on WND.

Source: WND Politics, Hopes pinned on Congress to halt Biden’s tax ‘vision’

Watch: Likely Capitol Rioter Booted Off Plane For Being A "Terrorist" 

Watch: Likely Capitol Rioter Booted Off Plane For Being A “Terrorist” 

Some pro-Trump rioters who stormed the Capitol complex last week may have already been added to the federal No-Fly List. 

Last Thursday, Rep. Bennie G. Thompson (D-MS), Chairman of the Committee on Homeland Security, released a statement requesting the Transportation Security Administration and the Federal Bureau of Investigation to use their powers to add pro-Trump rioters to the No-Fly List.

“Given the heinous domestic terrorist attack on the U.S. Capitol yesterday, I am urging the Transportation Security Administration and the Federal Bureau of Investigation to use their authorities to add the names of all identified individuals involved in the attack to the federal No-Fly List and keep them off planes,” Thompson said in a statement.

He added: “Alleged perpetrators of a domestic terrorist attack who have been identified by the FBI should be held accountable.”

Federal authorities have requested assistance in identifying people “related to violent activity” in the Capitol building. 

For days, one after another, rioters who stormed the Capitol have been identified and arrested. In particular, the most iconic image of the chaos last week was a man sitting back with his feet on Nancy Pelosi’s desk.

Days later, the man was arrested by federal authorities. 

So here’s where things get interesting. 

A video surfaced on Twitter Sunday via @RayRedacted who said, “People who broke into the Capitol Wednesday are now learning they are on No-Fly lists pending the full investigation. They are not happy about this.” 

The unidentified man, yelling at an unknown airport about being kicked off a plane because he was labeled a “terrorist.” 

In the video, the man could be heard saying, “They kicked me off the plane – they called me a f**king terrorist.” 

We should remind readers the video has yet to be confirmed.

Tyler Durden
Sun, 01/10/2021 – 18:33

Source: Zero Hedge, Watch: Likely Capitol Rioter Booted Off Plane For Being A “Terrorist”