by Defensor

We often hear our nation referred to as a democracy, having the generally understood meaning of rule by the people. Not that long ago, a different meaning of democracy was widely understood. Mob rule, which is more accurate, and one of the chief desires of the enemies of America. The mob is easily controlled by wealthy elitists, who use it as a fig leaf for their true desire, which is the restoration of open, autocratic rule. The useful idiots of the mob are mostly unaware that they are just an intermediate step in the elitist program, destined to be among the first dealt with when their purpose is finished.

The ancient Greeks used the word politeia to describe the politics of a region, the polity. At times, it was used in a more specific sense, i.e. the political efforts of the citizenry to usher policy making in the direction best suited to improve the lot of the common man, as well as the overall position of the city-state. This would seem to be a common sense approach, but it was novel because previously the politeia had been conducted to benefit the oligarchs only. In other words, what happened to a city or its inhabitants had been the private business of the moneyed interests. Sounds familiar, does it not?

It was this second, narrower meaning of politeia that the Romans later began to call res publica, meaning the public thing, or the public affair. From there, it was a short hop to arrive at our word republic. The great majority of Americans look at a map, and see the names of nations which have the word republic in their names, and do not mentally process what it actually means. They are saying that here, in this place, our affairs are ruled according to what best benefits the entire population. Yes, they make the claim, but many of them are republics in name only. In most, the money still has the power, concealed behind public structures of government.

Our Founders were highly educated men, well versed in the arguments of contemporary authors, writers who made intelligent arguments about the nature of man and the best way for the affairs of an entire people to be ruled. The selection of a republican form of government was made after much thought and discussion. A monarchy was not the answer, and neither was mob rule. Their deliberations correctly led them to a Constitutional Republic, a public thing operating within the strictures of a written constitution. Their great accomplishment was to write that constitution, and then obtain the consent of the states to make it the law of the land.

When asked what form of government the Founders had created, Franklin allegedly said, “A republic, if you can keep it.” Wise words from a wise man, indicating his understanding that a republic is only as good as the representatives who operate it, and by extension, only as good as the populace that selected those representatives. A people may only attain an overall “good” rating by adhering to a moral code. This code was understood to be The Ten Commandments, which were known by all, and believed to have been given by God for the spiritual guidance of mankind. It was in this context that The Constitution was birthed.

From the beginning, there were those who desired to evade legal restrictions, and therefore sought to subvert the system. These and their moral descendants have since been endeavoring to return to the old ways, with the nation’s affairs being conducted in service to the few, at the expense of the many. Their owned judges and public apologists have sought to twist the written words, while claiming that the Constitution is an anachronism. Now we have arrived at the great test. Will the document be destroyed, and the Republic overthrown? Traitors say yes, while Patriots say no. Traitors resent both God’s law and man’s law. Patriots embrace both, and are resolved to defend those words with strength and intelligence.

MISSIONS OF LIGHT SERIES Mission 5 — Pray/Encourage


Mission 5 — Pray/Encourage

by Aspen — ABCU|8 team


“Many in this movement are people of faith. Those who select this mission encourage and support other warriors.” [1]

How to exercise one’s faith is an individual matter. Each of us has different gifts. Some warriors are comfortable on the front lines, becoming active in civic affairs and local politics, sharing information on social media, writing, podcasting, or meming. Others prefer to remain inconspicuous. They are equally committed to the Great Awakening, but their chosen role is in the back room, helping and encouraging others. There are many ways to help.

Invisible Enemies

“Do (You) truly grasp what it means to have non-corporeal enemies? If (Your) enemies are non-corporeal, how can (You) fight [them]? If (You) do not know what [SPIRITUAL FORCES] are, how can (You) fight [them]? If (You) do not know what [RULERS] are, how can (You) fight [them]?” [6]

Ephesians 6:12 states that our enemies are not [flesh and blood], but [PRINCIPALITIES], [POWERS], [RULERS] of the darkness of this world, and [spiritual wickedness] in [high places]. The Aramaic to English/DIRECT translation of sheds light on non-corporeal enemies:

“Your hand-to-hand combat is not with human beings, but with the highest principalities and authorities operating in rebellion under the heavenly realms. For they are a powerful class of demon-gods and evil spirits that hold this dark world in bondage. Because of this, you must wear all the armor that God provides so you’re protected as you confront the slanderer, for you are destined for all things and will rise victorious. Put on truth as a belt to strengthen you to stand in triumph. Put on holiness as the protective armor that covers your heart.” [7]


The Invisible Enemy is no match for the Army of God’s concerted spiritual weapons. “Pray one for another to be healed, for the power of the prayer which a righteous person prays is great.” [2] “Pray without ceasing.” [3] “Speak to one another with psalms, hymns, and songs from the Spirit. Sing and make music from your heart to the Lord.” [4] “God is our refuge and strength, a very present help in trouble. Therefore will not we fear, though the earth be removed, and though the mountains be carried into the midst of the sea.” [5]

Focused Intention

Whether you believe in a Deity or not, you may wish to focus your intention in a very specific way. Think of the goals, hopes and dreams, and expectations that you have for the Great Awakening. Think how these goals may be manifested in the actions of digital warriors and friends. Put your attention on someone who needs help, and direct thoughts of loving encouragement their way. Why not try it!? Make some quiet time every day, for prayer, directed intention, or silent contemplation. Are there non-corporeal beings (some say angelic messengers, dragon energy, etc.) that respond to our thoughts? Is the human spirit likewise a non-corporeal entity outside of time and space? Do the electrical vibrations of our nervous system interface with the quantum field of the universe? Do our thoughts ripple outbound throughout infinite time and space? You could meditate and try to find out!


If someone is struggling or having a down day, give them encouragement. Let them know you appreciate what they are doing, and that you care about their success. Positive messages of encouragement can make a huge impact on others’ lives! Sincere words of praise and appreciation can empower others by increasing their confidence and providing useful feedback that helps them fine-tune their efforts. Your voice always matters, whether one-on-one or to a wider audience.

Material Assistance

You may learn of a person or a cause that needs financial support. If you are in a position to contribute, do so! Leverage your donations by carefully selecting individuals and groups with potential for the greatest positive impact. Ask them what kind of help they need; perhaps they need volunteers or equipment rather than money.

Above all, never, ever, ever give up!


1. Missions of Light – Introduction,

2. Bible, James 5:16, (several translations)

3. Bible, 1 Thessalonians 5:16-18,

4. Bible, Ephesians 5:19,

5. Bible, Psalms 46:1-2,

6. “We Are Here With You”,[DEMON-GODS]


MISSIONS OF LIGHT SERIES – Mission 4 — Talk to People


Mission 4 — Talk to People

by Aspen — ABCU|8 team

Listen and ask questions. The right kind of questions. Those are key to this mission.

“Some warriors are naturally gregarious, and strike up an easy conversation at the grocery store or with a delivery driver. They keep family in the loop by telephone, instant messaging, or email. They are good listeners and know how to ask the kinds of questions that lead others to uncover truths for themselves.” [1]

Fullsized image

If this is your mission, establishing close connections to lots of people is already in your nature. While it is very tempting to express one’s views forcefully, direct confrontation can have the paradoxical effect of pushing away those we hope to persuade.

People can become combative when their belief system is threatened. Cognitive dissonance is a very real phenomenon. [2] When new information contradicts what a person has long believed—upon which their beliefs and behavior are based—it is natural to reject that information. This can reach a crescendo until the person suddenly realizes they have to reconsider their beliefs and stand down. Or perhaps they simply cannot tolerate the dissonance, and take steps to distance themself from it, like walking away from the conversation or rejecting the information source. Our entrenched beliefs, whether real or false, are intrinsic to our concept of ourself, therefore our ego, our personhood. When this feeling of “who I am” is threatened, a fight-or-flight adrenaline reaction may occur. We have all felt threatened by uncomfortable information that we had to evaluate and decide whether to believe.

Rather than alarming them and provoking cognitive dissonance—which might cause them to distance themself from you—consider an alternate approach. First, find out where they stand. What they believe. What information sources they trust. Then you are in a position to ask Socratic questions that could help them release programmed beliefs without hardening their position.

Socratic questions are focused, open-ended questions that encourage reflection. They can surface knowledge that was outside of our awareness, resulting in insightful perspectives and positive actions. They are “widely used in teaching and counseling to expose and unravel deeply-held values and beliefs that frame and support what we think and say.” [3] Instead, you play dumb, acting as though ignorant of the subject. This encourages the other person to become active in exploring the question, and their beliefs concerning it.

You might start with questions that are not too far from what they already believe. Allow them time to consider the questions and react to them in their own way. This approach takes time, but the results can be rewarding. Truths that someone uncovers for themself are generally the most impactful. A Mission 4 warrior is successful to the degree that their family, friends and acquaintances relinquish tidy sound-bites and start thinking for themselves. Your goal is not to think for them, but to encourage the development of critical thinking and introspection skills in others.


1. Missions of Light – Introduction,

2. Cognitive Dissonance: The Deep State’s Last Stand?,

3. Socratic Questioning in Psychology: Examples and Techniques,



Mission 3b — Write

by Aspen — ABCU|8 team

“Warriors with the journalist/writer specialty get information from a variety of sources and share it by writing, podcasting, or posting. Their goal is not to imitate a mainstream media anchor, but to offer something the Mockingbird media lacks: candor, truth, and analysis.” [1]

Writer-warriors come in many varieties. Some are inclined to present their ideas in writing, others orally. This mission may be for you, if you have some skill expressing yourself in words, AND you feel a powerful urge to communicate your thoughts to others.

Intake of current events is essential for a writer-warrior. Interacting with others around trending topics will refine and sharpen your opinions. But before writing or podcasting, you must detach from your information sources long enough to formulate your own thoughts. Turning away from the information flow is a very hard step for those accustomed to constantly consuming data, but it is essential! Give yourself enough space to shape your thoughts into cogent text. If you are writing factual material, remember the W’s: Who, What, Where, Why, When, hoW.

Fullsized image

What to Write or Talk About

That’s up to you! A real news ecosystem is diverse, not uniform. Expect incomplete data from several vantage points. Controversy is welcome when our disagreements are respectful and courteous. Naturally people with different backgrounds and life experiences will have differing opinions. Almost anything you are inspired to write about, needs to be written about! Topics from your direct personal experience are a great starting place. As you grow as a writer and pursue your interests, focus areas will emerge.

Where to Publish

To determine if the Writer-warrior mission is a fit, try your hand at writing short fact or opinion posts on forums, imageboards, or sites that permit commenting. Survey websites that deliver real news and pick a few. Learn about their editorial standards. Is there a maximum length? Style guidelines? How often do they publish? Are submissions accepted? Can you use a pseudonym? Are independent writers paid?

Consider the American Broadcasting CommUnity. ABCU|8 intends to create a better source of news than mainstream media outlets provide. It seeks to place YOUR VOICE back into the narrative. [2] Submissions are welcome.

For podcasting, consider the Tiger Network [3]. It also supports free speech. Streamers can livestream to YouTube, Twitch, Facebook, and more streaming sites at once, or upload videos. Guidance on livestreaming software is provided. [4]

The Writing Process

It is useful to divide the development of an article or podcast outline into two phases: a creative phase and a refinement phase. Experienced writers do this instinctively, but the technique can be learned.

In the creation phase, give yourself broad latitude to think or imagine anything! Jot down notes or ideas. Read or listen to inputs related to the topic. In this phase, you must suspend judgment. Do not attempt to evaluate “This is good; this is bad.” The more concepts you juxtapose in a disorganized heap, the more creative you become! This is a very important secret.

In the refinement phase, narrow the scope by selecting specific ideas to include or exclude. Consider the target audience, what order to present your ideas, article length, and similar criteria. You either draft an outline, or start writing sentences and paragraphs. The article takes shape.

Now take a second pass. Re-read sentences and find ways to improve them. Use a thesaurus [5] to select better synonyms for stale words: sometimes viewing word suggestions leads to developments you had not considered! Ensure that the ideas are presented in the right order. Simplify awkward or wordy sentences. Most word processors offer options to check spelling and grammar. Double-check citations and footnotes for accuracy.

Continuous Improvement

Practice continually improves a writer’s skill. Review your last post or article. Be honest: would you say it that way again, with what you know now? What reactions did you get? Was something misunderstood? Or did lights go on in people’s heads—you succeeded in communicating?

Decide on your personal goal, and set a firm intention to achieve it. Be persistent! If you take a small step toward the goal each day, you will get there. What if you managed yourself like a business? You would measure your progress against set expectations, and evaluate yourself objectively, considering feedback from others. If some skills need improvement, you would backtrack and and execute a plan to fix them.


Above all, never, ever, ever, give up!


1. Missions of Light – Introduction,

2. American Broadcasting CommUnity,

3. The Tiger Network,

4. Broadcasting Guidelines,


MISSIONS OF LIGHT SERIES – Mission 3 — Social Media


Mission 3 — Social Media

by Aspen — ABCU|8 team

“Mission 3. Social Media. At a basic level, a social media warrior might begin by simply establishing accounts on twitter, parler, gab, instagram, Facebook, etc. and Liking or Retweeting informative posts.” Missions of Light—Introduction,

Social media offers a vital channel to catch breaking news that is disregarded by the mainstream media. Your social media networks are crucial for spreading information and influence. For descriptive purposes, we’ll divide the social media mission into categories, from the easiest to the most advanced. Everyone can adopt at least a minor a social media warrior role, in addition to other Missions of Light.

A. Scout Role. Scouts scan information sources and share data wherever other warriors congregate. Scout is an intelligence role. They look for trends, identify friends and enemies, and highlight important breaking news. This role does not necessarily require a social media account. It’s a good way to become familiar with social media.

B. Flank Role. Flanks have social media accounts, but do not need to originate tweets/posts. They establish networks of friends, and they follow others. When they see a post that serves the Great Awakening, they amplify it by Liking or Retweeting, to increase the message’s prominence so it will be seen by more eyes.

C. Tactical Assault Role. These warriors establish an energetic social media presence and often accumulate large followings. They often comment forcefully about current events. Their opinions are influential, often swaying many others to their point of view. These opinion leaders become highly skilled at influence campaigns. They are completely familiar with all of the platform’s nuances, traditions, and expectations. They know “who’s who” and have strong relationships with other opinion leaders.

D. Social Media Personalities. These individuals became prominent outside of social media. They may be politicians, mainstream media commentators, journalists, talk show hosts, attorneys, and so forth. They are often primary sources who originate new information directly into cyberspace.

The best way to evaluate the possibility of taking on a social media mission is to begin at the Scout level and gain familiarity with a particular social platform. If the role fits your interest and skills, then set a firm intention about your goals and make a plan to achieve them. Make incremental progress each day and measure your performance against your own expectations. If problems arise (e.g. account suspended), seek advice from experienced social media warriors. Understand that Big Tech has rigged the game against conservatives. Find inspiration in tweets from patriots like @POTUS, @SidneyPowell1, @GenFlynn, @LLinWood, etc.

Never, ever, ever, give up!



Mission 2—Meme

by Aspen – ABCU|8 team

Have you seen memes that grabbed your attention quickly—memes that demanded being shared? Do you feel the call to meme?

“Memers often major in visual presentation skills. We value memers’ ability to capture the essence of an idea in a few words accompanied by well-chosen images. They often use irony, humor, beauty, exaggeration, etc. to drive the message home.” [1]

Memes (images with added text) are a valuable tool in our info warfare arsenal. They became popular with the rise of social media. An effective meme impacts the viewer in a fraction of a second. A really funny or ironic meme stands a good chance of being retweeted and spreading virally.

Memes are like the ultimate cluster munition. No blood loss, no damage to property—the only thing memes can destroy is a narrative. They cause brains unaccustomed to independent thought to begin mental exercise. They stimulate minds to question that which is, and to visualize that which could be. Unlike cluster munitions, memes can impact thousands in moments, yet their residual effect lingers as other minds encounter them later. Memes are the most dangerous of weapons, for they do not end, but create new beginnings.

Not all memes are created equal, though. This writer’s “Tao of Memes” [2] picks apart meme examples and critiques them, with the goal of raising our craft to the next level. It discusses technical aspects like image selection, size and shape to maximize exposure, text and fonts, strategies, and graphics tools. You don’t have to be an artist (but it helps); pithy verbiage alone can be a meme!

It would be foolhardy to ignore decades of marketing research on the psychology of influence. A superb meme presents an idea from the reader’s perspective. To do this, a memer sets aside their own viewpoint and temporarily adopts a different person’s perspective. Ask yourself if your meme should confront and punish, or get inside the viewer’s head to tease, delight, or inspire? Is it deleted and not forwarded because it insults the viewer? What about foul language? There’s a time and a place for it…but it’s a turnoff for some viewer segments. Will it go viral? Is it funny? Wry? Sarcastic? Surprising? Emotional? Beautiful? Elevating? Memorable? Insulting? Provocative? Boring? What is the target audience?

If such questions intrigue you, give the Memer’s Mission a try. Study others’ memes on social media. Consider collaborating with a Researcher [3] to gain vital information that needs to be shared. When ready, select the hot topic of the day, and create a phrase to deliver your message. Select an appropriate image, apply your text, and let fly! The best memers perfect their craft through trial and error, observing what works and what doesn’t. Ultimately, no one can predict which meme will go viral. Those who perfect the memer’s craft are held in high esteem by fellow digital warriors.


1. Missions of Light—Introduction,

2. The Tao of Memes Good, the Bad, and the Ugly or What makes a good meme GREAT?,

3. Missions of Light—1. Research/Dig,



by Defensor

A complicated and seemingly infinite road has been trod by each of us, bringing us all to the crucial crossroads, the place of the greatest decision in history. The world is engaged in a great, winner-take-all war, with no compromise possible between the two sides. This is so, because of the stark differences in their objectives, which amount to the combatants occupying two wildly different, competing timelines. This war will be fought to the finish, like Jedi vs. Sith, with those descriptors being loosely accurate for the present situation. The winning timeline, and its adherents, will occupy the main trunk timeline as we proceed into the future. The losing side will take a different fork, into the outer darkness.

Who are the combatants? There are nuances of course, but it comes down to Light vs. Dark, Good vs. Evil. The same battle that began with the Angels’ revolt, and was transferred to the Earthly Theater of War. Satan and minions vs. God and servants. Traitors, NWO lackeys, money worshiping international bankers and corporate bosses, false religious leaders, false scientists, pretentious royals, demonic media and those who simply refuse to abide by the law of man or God—these are all of the same essence. They serve the Dark Lord and the Self. We will call them all Satanists, for that is who they follow, whether they admit it or not. On the light side, we have those who acknowledge The Creator, and willingly abide by His laws. They love Him, and confess their sins to Him. They long to see His face. We will combine patriots, God fearing people, those who willingly serve others, and those who have perceived an unprecedented threat, into the category of The Righteous.

What do Satanists desire, and intend to implement as the guideline for mankind? Crowley stated it succinctly. “Do what thou wilt” shall be the whole of the Law… No law at all, in other words. A middle finger raised to Heaven, and a fist to all humans who establish temporal law, such as The Constitution. Such as this not only hate The Righteous, but are filled with contempt for them. They long to bring suffering, humiliation, and death to the good people. This manifests in ways such as desiring to kill live-born babies, or relentlessly whittling away at age-of-consent laws, in order to establish legal pedophilia. It manifests in endless wars, human trafficking, drug trafficking, and needless hunger/disease/poverty. More than anything else, it manifests as The Big Lie enshrined. After all, Satan is The Father of Lies.

Of course, The Righteous desire the exact opposite. The honoring of both God’s law and man’s law (evenly applied), respect for the human body, honoring of God’s chosen family unit, peace, prosperity, protection for the vulnerable, and The Truth. These people understand that the words of God will be fulfilled, at a point of His choosing on the timeline. They also know they have the duty to fight for the right here and now. They understand that it is correct to defeat evil for a time, if God wills it. It is their honor and joy to fight for this objective to be attained, for themselves, their loved ones, and their country. The entire world watches intently, for the fate of all people hangs in the balance.

The overall position favors the light side. The battle is everywhere, but focused on America at this time. This is the center of the battlefield, and whoever wins will either enslave the rest of the planet, or help them find the best of all possible worlds. We patriots greatly outnumber our satanic adversaries, those who contemptuously call us deplorables, and boast of the payback lists they are creating. We are far better armed. We enjoy the majority of military support. We are more intelligent (it’s true). We are legally and morally in the right. We are more determined than ever before, being well able to understand the mortal attack being waged against us. We enjoy superlative leadership. If we stay true, and earnestly petition the Almighty for help, we may be blessed with it.

The enemy is running out of time, space, and assets. Many of their human assets within the deep state machinery have been gradually removed, even as other sleeper traitors are now being forced to reveal themselves. Their fake pandemic is exposed. The street satanists are now known in detail, as are their tactics. Their funds are limited/restricted. Their allied world leaders have already made their big announcements congratulating Moron Biden, and gotten little traction with it. They have shot their election stealing bolt, and it looks 20-1 as if it has failed. The time aspect is now focused on December 14, and The Electoral College. They are going to lose, either by President Trump winning the 6 crucial states outright, or by state legislatures sending in Trump Electoral Slates no matter what. Then what remains for the losers? The final faux street uprising, likely with weapons, perhaps within the context of secession announcements. These flailings are clearly destined for defeat, but will probably be tried anyway, because it is their final chance. An extremely forlorn chance, but drowning people clutch at straws.

We are winning. Hold the line. Stand tall under the flag. Drive them into their last stand corner, and finish them off.

MISSIONS OF LIGHT SERIES – Mission 1—Research/Dig


Mission 1—Research/Dig

by Aspen – ABCU|8 team

“The research mission is fundamental to all the others. Researchers uncover relevant facts using open sources. Avidly curious like a dog uncovering buried bones, they dig and dig until their appetite for facts is satisfied. They share their findings with others on forums, image boards, discords, blogs, or social media, documenting their discoveries to make the information available.” [1]

Is this you? Do you dig research?

What to Dig
You will come across topics that are misunderstood, or incompletely understood. Trust your intuition. Some of these will instantly rise to the top of your personal priority list. If you’re not sure, jot down a few notes while perusing news feeds. This phase need not be too rigorous; there are many worthy topics and any one of them may contribute to the Great Awakening.

What sources do you scrutinize to follow current events? There is no one-size-fits-all recommendation. In fact, our diversity strengthens us, as patriots fan out to cover different parts of the information sphere. You may find ideas on Facebook, Twitter, a favorite blog, alternative news, or even the TV. Twitter can be a goldmine of breaking news and opinion, if we ignore @Jack’s suggestions and select Follows based on content, relevance, timeliness, and affiliation. With experience, you’ll discern who to trust.

Use MSM sources with caution and a grain of salt—maybe a handful of salt. When talking heads speak in unison, that’s a Mockingbird narrative—sleight of hand that says “Look here; don’t look there.” When [they] want to guide the public into thinking a certain way, we should dig around to identify what [they] are covering up.

How to Dig
Try the Open Source Intelligence framework [2]. Diggers assembled an enormous collection of research tools here [3]. Different search engines may produce radically different results. Google editorializes and omits, based on paid advertising and current information-management initiatives. [4] Duck Duck Go may be a better choice. [5]’s image database is extraordinary. [6]

A screen-capture tool to snapshot work in progress can help keep the digs organized. Some prefer pen and paper, others a text editor to copy and paste URLs and longer text. If you like to work fast, don’t get bogged down perfecting your notes; you will have a better idea of connections and importance as the dig proceeds. You may want to share intermediate results to get others engaged digging with you.

Develop your own techniques for digging on people. Try placing quotes around names, adding a middle initial, age, state, address, corporation, spouse, area code, or any other piece of known data to increase the scope of what you can find. For family connections, try the obituaries or Real estate and property tax records can be enlightening. Sites like LinkedIn [8] are quite useful if you can log in. It is amazing what one can learn without using any paid services. Vary the search type from web to news to images to mine even more data.

As you learn how data is organized—e.g. which department keeps records of births, marriages, deaths, real estate ownership, corporations, LLCs or partnerships—you will be able to dig deeper. Contemporaneous newspaper articles that are often not well indexed can shed surprising light on a topic. Some diggers specialize in financial data, digging into SEC filings, corporate press releases, or the tax returns of charitable foundations. Any of these avenues can shed light on people or organizations.

Sharing the Results
How to share the results depends on the needs of your target audience. Always include links to sources so others can verify your dig and pursue it themselves, should they wish to. A combination of screenshots, web addresses (URLs), text, and most importantly, your own description of what you noticed, is a good formula to get started. Tools like help communicate complex information. Drawing diagrams that show connections among data items helps make the data consumable. [7] Digs that result in high-quality maps tend to get shared widely.

Stay tuned! ABCU|8 plans further articles on the other Missions of Light.


1. Missions of Light – Introduction,

2. OSINT Framework,

3. Research Tools and Techniques,

4. Google search engine,

5. Duck Duck Go search engine,

6. Yandex (Russian search engine),

7. Flowchart Maker and Online Diagram Software,

8. LinkedIn Professional Community

Flynn Jr: Trump Campaign Statement on Powell has to do with Legal Funding

Flynn Jr: Trump Campaign Statement on Powell has to do with Legal Funding

by: John Cleer

Michael Flynn Jr · @mflynnJR

Wrt the @JennaEllisEsq press release

Cannot confirm yet but I’m confident this has to do w money coming in for legal defense fund sppt

@SidneyPowell has her own separate entity 4 legal donations that isn’t in conjunction w the Trump legal team

Frees SP 2 do her own thing…which will STILL b biblical.

Give this the 24 hour rule….



President Trump didn’t “disown” Sydney Powell and it wasn’t a wild statement from his campaign that distanced Powell, and you can disregard any RINO’s who say otherwise. The president’s campaign and legal team have their own rules to meet regarding funding.

There’s also the question of liability, regarding Powell’s press conferences: if she makes accusations against Dominion (which she has already has, repeatedly) as a member of the Trump campaign, Dominion could sue the Trump campaign for defamation. Would they win? NO. But that would give the Trump campaign another obstacle, and another judge, and they’re already under a tight deadline.

Further there are political implications, as Powell has accused Trump’s supposed ally, Governor Brian Kemp of Georgia, of getting kickbacks from Dominion Voting Systems in a pay-for-play scheme. Kemp, like Nancy Pelosi, has a former Chief of Staff lobbying for Dominion; unlike Pelosi, however, he is a Republican, and there will be other Republicans implicated in Georgia (which Powell says “is probably going to be the first state I’m blowing up”), and President Trump might not want to start a fight with his own party in the middle of all of this. [1]

He likely will also want to avoid accusations that he is prosecuting his political opponents.

So it’s perfectly sensible for the Trump Campaign to “officially” distance themselves from Powell right now, and she’s said she agrees with it. It also bears little relationship to the outcome of the election or any of the lawsuits regarding election fraud. So of course the Democrats are saying otherwise, they’re liars.

On Saturday, Jordan Sekulow, son of Trump’s longtime attorney Jay, made a similar statement to Powell’s regarding the Georgia election. [2]

Powell’s censored tweet that earned her a 12-hour ban linked this article: from the Bannon- and Giuliani-associated Chinese dissident who leaked what were likely blackmail pictures from Hunter Biden’s laptop last month. The article breaks down Soros’ and the CCP’s role in Dominion/Smartmatic/Sequoia vote rigging software. [3]

Nationwide, Powell claims that Biden’s votes were “weighted” at around 1.25 times under Dominion algorithms, while President Trump’s were weighted at .75, and 35,000 votes were given to every Democratic candidate on the undercard, in every race. Dominion, by design she says, allows administrators to drag and drop votes into the trash, which they did. “I think the fraud went much further than just President Trump,” she told Newsmax. “I think they did it to John James and others.” [1]

Across the country, 7 million votes were taken from Trump by Powell’s count, and 3 million dead people voted (probably all for Biden). This is much bigger news than the Trump campaign’s announcement, which appears to have been a formality. Why aren’t more conservatives talking about this? [4]

The evidence for all this will have to play out in the courts, and Powell is one of the top lawyers in the country. Reading pseudonomous clickbait writers call her a “conspiracy theorist,” misrepresent the Trump campaign and demoralize Trump’s base makes my blood boil. What about you? Are you ok with that?? [5]











by Defensor

I am talking to you, self righteous MSM watcher, existing in a feedback loop of delusional ignorance, laziness, and dishonesty. You lacked the mental and/or moral force to break the programming. Many of us did break away, yet you failed. You watched a significant slice of your former allies, correctly make the jump to the Trump camp. Yet you decided to take the easy way, and cling to the old programming with all your strength, continually reassured by the talking heads and also by your fellow mesmerized leftists.

What is it you are supporting with every ounce of your mind, heart, body and pocketbook? All of it–the entire leftist platform. The killing of babies who are born alive. The open legalization of pedophilia, with worse planned. The confiscation of weapons from the populace, in particular the righteous/sane segment. The de facto abolition of national borders, i.e. the end of the nation, as well as Western civilization. The continuance of needless wars forever. The overt conquest of the world, by China. Forced immunizations with deadly materials. Taxes dramatically raised, to the rapid destruction of the remaining middle class. Mask wearing forever. Needless forced lockdowns, expediting that middle class destruction. The vicious destruction of our history and traditions. The ephemeral abeyance of God’s spiritual laws, while overthrowing The Constitution’s temporal guidelines. The further entrenchment of false science, a cementing of the big lie(s). Horrific racism installed as the norm, by the worst racists of all time. Bestiality. The indefinite installation of the satanic power pyramid into control of all earthly affairs.

What is it that you are vehemently opposed to, whether or not you admit it as such? The honoring of human life, in accordance with God’s laws. The nurturing of our young. Private property. Honest education. The drug impeding wall, for the survival of both Mexico and the US (Trump is called a racist for saving us). The right to self defense. A nation we can call our own, with its history, laws, and traditions. The chance for honest money, equal protection under the law, prosperity, and security. Truth. Real science. Optimal medical care. President Donald J. Trump has championed all these things, and much more that benefits us all, yet you hate him for it, because your MSM brain programming masters tell you to do so. You are responsible.

Those supporting the open election theft, are going to lose. The election stealing attempt has already been defeated, and its proponents are in the process of losing much more than that. No more respect will be coming their way, respect they never deserved, but was granted for long years, in the forlorn hope that they would open their eyes and see what a dark road they were on. That road has inevitably led to this window in time, wherein mankind fights for existence vs. demonic forces. Some saw it, and came over to be part of the 75% of voters who opted for President Trump. The hard core fanatics persevered, and they bear responsibility for this failure.

Some rough beast is slouching toward Bethlehem, urged on by failed humans on the left side (along with some from the right), who are proudly making lists of Trump supporters that they desire to punish for being rational, and for fighting to protect the lives of their families, while preserving The Republic. Why do patriots do so? Because they love the Lord and His laws, identify with these, and earnestly long to do that which best reflects their understanding of the light framework. They have chosen, as have you, fanatic leftist. They will never quit or surrender. This is your last chance to somewhat mitigate the disgrace you have brought on yourself. Stand down. Admit that your idols are blatantly attempting to take over the nation, and by proxy, the world. Declare that you can no longer support them, and that you intend to abide by the Constitution while defending it. Fall on your knees and beg forgiveness from the true King of Heaven. Do it now, as your time is up.

Missions of Light – Introduction

Missions of Light – Introduction

by Aspen – ABCU|8 team

Fullsized image

What is your Mission of Light? Are you one of those patriots who wants to help but is not quite sure how to begin? This series of articles “Missions of Light” is for you.

There are many roles in the cyber militia, as information warriors come in all shapes and sizes. Roles are available to fit each warrior’s skills, interests, and time commitment.

The mainstream media is not doing their job, so we aim to replace them. Big media companies will become much less important. What is emerging is a grassroots collaboration inspired by common goals. The new organization is fluid and flexible, ever-changing and adapting as new tasks present themselves. Together, we are reshaping the world, replacing stale paradigms with fresh new ones tailored to our needs.

Fullsized image

Mission 1. Research/Dig. The research mission is fundamental to all the others. Researchers uncover relevant facts using open sources. Avidly curious like a dog uncovering buried bones, they dig and dig until their appetite for facts is satisfied. They share their findings with others on forums, image boards, discords, blogs, or social media, documenting their discoveries to make the information available.

Mission 2. Meme. Memers often major in visual presentation skills. We value memers’ ability to capture the essence of an idea in a few words accompanied by well-chosen images. They often use irony, humor, beauty, exaggeration, etc. to drive the message home. You don’t have to be a Photoshop genius to become a great memer.

Fullsized image

Mission 3. Social Media. This mission encompasses several subcategories. At a basic level, a social media warrior might begin by simply establishing accounts on twitter, parler, gab, instagram, etc. and Liking or Retweeting informative posts. Warriors with the journalist/writer specialty get information from a variety of sources and share it by tweeting, writing, podcasting, or posting. Their goal is not to imitate a mainstream media anchor, but to offer something the Mockingbird media lacks: candor, truth, and analysis.

Mission 4. Talk to people in your life. Some warriors are naturally gregarious, and strike up an easy conversation at the grocery store or with a delivery driver. They keep family in the loop by telephone, instant messaging, or email. They are good listeners and know how to ask the kinds of questions that lead others to uncover truths for themselves.

Fullsized image

Mission 5. Pray/Encourage. Many in this movement are people of faith. “Now you are the body of Christ and individually members of it.” I Cor. 12:27 Recognizing that some are called as teachers, healers, administrators, givers, etc., those who select this mission encourage and support other warriors.

Mission 6. Local Politics. Some warriors exert their influence in the local sphere. They attend town or city council meetings, get a role in the homeowner’s association, voice their opinions to the planning board, or run for a position on the school board. They write letters to the editor or publish a neighborhood newsletter. Through participation in public life, they establish liaisons with other patriots. While serving their community they become an advocate for local citizens. For some, a local beginning precedes their rise into state or national politics.

Stay tuned! ABCU|8 plans further articles on the individual Missions of Light.

The Media’s Role in This Year’s Election Fraud, and the Need for Accountability

The Media’s Role in This Year’s Election Fraud, and the Need for Accountability

by John Cleer | ABCU8

The liberals have been telling us there’s no election fraud of any kind for at least four years, since Candidate Trump said there were millions of illegal votes being cast for Hillary. Obama that year said it was impossible to rig a US election. This argument if you can call it that was punctuated for 3 years with shrieks that Russia rigged our election.


I can’t even read the Clintons’ names without my eyes rolling into the back of my head; overwhelming evidence of their wrongdoing over the years has gone public (and is readily searchable on Breitbart) and yet, not one charge has been prosecuted. Hillary’s campaign emails were leaked in 2016 exposing, along with the Judicial Watch FOIA emails, a number of seven-figure contributions to the Clinton Foundation from foreign governments that had every appearance of influence peddling and we were told against all common sense that we must ignore them, as they were part of a RUSSIAN PLOT to interfere in our election by exposing corruption.

It’s since come out that the entire Russia plot was a lie, and one that John Brennan said, in a briefing to President Obama, was concocted by Hillary’s campaign “as a means of distracting the public from her use of a private email server.” The use of a private server in itself is important because Hillary Clinton was holding stolen SAP-level (above Top Secret) classified information on that server, and may have been using the server to sell it.


Yes, she stole those materials: classified government files on a private server have left the government’s possession, whether or not that server is subsequently breached. Even the Clinton-friendly NYT reported that her server was probably hacked–but what evidence do we have that the supposed hackers did so without permission? It’s a charitable assumption isn’t it? What were SAP files doing there in the first place? Foreign governments were dumping money into the Clinton Foundation and CGI right up to Hillary’s loss; after which the CGI was closed almost immediately, and the CF started losing money.


In retrospect you can see the Times setting up the Russia hoax in that article. They portrayed Hillary as being careless with intel, which happened to be Comey’s (nonsensical) rationale for not indicting her, without mentioning that she had to steal that intel in the first place to even have it on a private server. It was property of the US government. So why did she steal it?

After being caught, Clinton’s aides smashed her phones with hammers, “lost” her laptops “in the mail” and scrubbed her server with Bleachbit to obstruct investigation into whatever it was she did. They also attempted to retroactively declassify the materials in order to obscure their theft.


These are not only crimes, but they suggest that a larger crime took place sufficient to justify such measures, which likewise has yet to be prosecuted.

They also suggest that powerful figures on the Left have allies in the media who will lie for them, and do. If Brennan’s account (of Russiagate being a tool to distract from Clinton’s server) is to be believed, then the MSM did the job for her. For three whole years we were told that Russia put the fix in.

Now that the shoe’s on the other foot, the media is again incredulous at any suggestion of election tampering. A phantom candidate who can’t draw 50 people to a rally has set the record for popular votes after hiding in his basement for most of the election (including October) and achieved this despite receiving relatively few votes in person; and now the “evidence is coming in through a firehose” that his votes have been forged in a number of ways.


This won’t surprise anyone who watched as the narrative was established, months ago, that because of their fear of the covid virus, most Democrats would fill out their ballots in the privacy of their homes and vote by mail, making the in-person vote meaningless and true observation of most of the vote impossible. Trump would appear to win on election night, since Democrats were using the mail, and then according to the polls he would lose, no matter his lead. For the first time in history, the vote casting process for one party (the Dems) would largely escape observation.

But there are laws mandating that the counting of these mail-in ballots must allow poll watchers from both sides. Why then were swing state ballots being counted behind boarded windows in the middle of the night, with Republicans chanting “let us in” from outside, and how did Biden manage to receive 130,000 votes in a row under such conditions? This is statistically impossible; furthermore the ballots weren’t allowed to be observed. Afterward we were told Biden “won” the state by tens of thousands of votes.


OF COURSE this merits further investigation and will almost certainly be overturned–put Michigan and Pennsylvania in the bag for Trump, they weren’t even close. But many Americans think they were because they believe what they see on television: they trust the legacy media.

The media have abused this trust shamelessly and they must be investigated and held accountable in court for their role in promoting this fraud. Is there a massive body of evidence to support election fraud? Don’t even suggest that, says Jake Tapper, or you’ll lose your job. Don’t act up or we’ll impoverish you and your family will starve.

This is open intimidation of the general public by a major news source. Was Tapper instructed to say this? Of course he was. By whom? In what other ways did they act to prevent a fair election?

Some portion of the MSM have caved and they now admit there was voter fraud but contend it wasn’t enough to sway the election, and insist this proclamation of theirs be accepted without further thought. I was surprised to see Tucker Carlson in this camp, employee though he be. This will follow him everywhere, he’s destroyed his own brand; it won’t matter what network he moves to when Fox News loses their market.

“The fraud that we can confirm does not seem to be enough to alter the election result,” Tucker says. “We should be honest and tell you that… But changing the election results is not the whole point.”


The Chairman of the Federal Election Commision disagrees. “I do believe that there is voter fraud taking place in these places. Otherwise [swing state precincts] would allow the observers to go in…. if the law is not followed it makes this an illegitimate election.”


And as Rudy Giuliani said on November 5th, “a legal vote is a vote, whether it’s an absentee vote or a mail-in vote, that both sides get to observe … The law requires that we have the opportunity to oberve; we were denied the opportunity to observe, for 21 hours, throughout the state of Pennsylvania.”

Without getting into Dominion software or any of the statistical analyses that show systematic vote tampering, widespread count inaccuracies and a clear intent to cheat, Giuliani estimates the number of unobserved votes in PA alone at over 650,000.


Deliberate and forceful exclusion of poll watchers on such a scale should be enough to make the media pump the brakes on their narrative; but they aren’t. They continue to call Biden “President Elect,” hypnotically, as half of the country watches in a trance, without a clue that most of his votes are coming back. How will the MSM explain it to them when that happens? They will most likely incite the public to riot (again).

This is an organized effort to seize power by corrupting the vote, and restoring the rightful winner won’t be enough to restore trust in the government. Justice must be delivered, every aspect of this election that was falsified must be investigated, and every participant prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Every coup that’s been attempted during Trump’s presidency must be prosecuted vigorously.

Then we can revisit the Clintons.












America Needs Truth Therapy

America Needs Truth Therapy

by Aspen – ABCU|8 team

Fullsized image

Our world is truth-starved. Truth is non-negotiable. It is my bottom line, and it should be your bottom line. No matter what your faith (or no faith), the practice of truth is fundamental. There can be no logic, without a set of facts upon which logic depends.

―Christian: “I am the way, and the truth, and the life” [1]
―Buddhist: Remove all ideas and concepts, in order for the truth to have a chance to reveal itself. [2]
―Hindu: A truthful person must be a practitioner of truth in word and deed. [6]
―None of the Above: “If you tell the truth, you don’t have to remember anything.” ― Mark Twain [5]
―“The truth will set you free, but first it will piss you off.” ― Joe Klaas, Twelve Steps to Happiness [5]

Are all truths empirically verifiable? Of course not. Some arise through contemplation, discernment, or logic. Although human sensory perception can be tricked by optical illusions that game our nervous system’s chemical reactions [7], we must not abandon our embrace of truth.

Just how far has society strayed from truth? The mainstream media can no longer be trusted. “The press in our country no longer seek to record events and report them. They seek to shape events.” Rep. Matt Gaetz [3] Big Tech employs ‘fact checkers’ whose job is what George Orwell called ‘thought police’. By limiting what may be said in public discourse, these deep-state minions―these leftist desk-jockey mercenaries―aim to completely extinguish our freedom of speech.

The MSM is now a full-fledged propaganda arm of the Marxists. They will NOT tell the truth outside of their narrative. And the purpose of their narrative is to create a compliant slave population who will follow orders like obedient sheep, willingly relinquishing every right that our Constitution and Bill of Rights affords us. [4] And we are shamed if we resist.

“Congress is not going to rein in Big Tech, because Congress is bought by Big Tech,” Rep. Matt Gaetz said. “There are just simply too many members of the House and Senate who are beholden to Big Tech either because of political donations or because their family members are getting employed by Big Tech.” [8]

Small lies that people shrugged off as commonplace―e.g. calling in sick to get a day off from work when you are not sick―have been replaced by enormous lies that serve the globalist agenda. Consider global warming, for one example. It’s a lie underpinned by falsified data that has been thoroughly debunked, yet remains widely believed due relentless propaganda [9]. Is it really necessary for scientists to exaggerate to get our attention? Or does that set a really bad precedent?

Our ability to make accurate judgments and to plan for the future becomes compromised when the data we believe is false. False data undercuts our reasoning power, and thereby destroys free will. When we lose free will, we are slaves. And when the slaves don’t even know they’re slaves, all is lost.

The solution? Truth therapy. We must become relentless in our pursuit of truth. We must relearn forgotten skills. We must go outside the system to ascertain facts for ourselves. That means taking responsibility to read, listen, view, research. Real news exhibits courteous controversy between reasoned viewpoints. Real news includes incomplete information and differing vantage points, as well as opinions arising from different backgrounds and life experiences. That means rejecting predigested viewpoints and actually thinking for ourselves.

If a mainstream media outlet is found to be lying, then we must deny it the power to influence us ever again, by disregarding it. The same is true for elected officials, scientists, educators, celebrities, etc. And we must become a light that shares truth with others, giving them the opportunity to resurrect long-suppressed reasoning skills. “No one lights a lamp and then puts it under a basket. Instead, a lamp is placed on a stand, where it gives light to everyone in the house.” [10] Be the light; insist on truth!

Fullsized image


1. Holy Bible, John 14:6,

2. Thich Nhat Hanh,

3. Thoughts from a Common Man,

4. Know Your Rights,


6. Truth According to Hinduism,

7. Thomas Schoenberger, Brain Apple – A video to enhance concentration, clarity and focus,

8. Congress Not Going to Rein in Big Tech, Congress is Owned by Big Tech,

9. Why Apocalyptic Claims About Climate Change Are Wrong,

10. Holy Bible, Matthew 5:15,

Freedom Seeds

Freedom Seeds

Fullsized image

by Aspen – ABCU|8 team

Before people started to notice, you felt it. With a little tickle, something awoke in fertile soil at the back of your mind. It’s always been there, able to germinate at any time, pending the right conditions.

What quickens a freedom seed? Love. It’s really that simple: it responds to love. When did it start? Did you notice the new possibilities first, or were you tired of being stuck in a rut? Or was it the insistent cumulative vibration of hive-mind peers that jolted you out of a suffocating dream?

That’s the sound of the great awakening. It’s affecting every one of us in unforeseen ways.

Imagine if the world chose a different path, a better path. “Love one another, as I have loved you,” Jesus said. Trusting the promise, the seed spontaneously extends toward the light, with neither fear nor longing, only the natural gesture of growth. Bathed in divine radiance, its inner nature silently unfolds, extending into a perceptible presence. In an atmosphere of love, even arrested development must proceed inexorably toward maturity. The luminosity of our love benefits others in unfathomable ways.

“For I know the plans I have for you,” declares the LORD, “plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future.” In a burgeoning chorus, your seed hears other seeds activating, like the strident voices of spring peepers singing out from a shallow pond. But we are speaking of an invisible web of the spirit, transporting vibrations of the heart. Nothing can stop what is coming! Our shared dream cannot be crushed or silenced. You are not alone; you were never alone.

Peek into the rear-view mirror at the detritus left behind. Collectively, humanity is turning the page on a reprehensible chapter where evil was allowed to thrive. In darkness, its deeds remained hidden, and it flourished. Its dark coils tightened ever so gradually that we remained unaware. Vampire-like, evil shuns exposure. “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing,” wrote Edmund Burke. Only now, at the precipice of destruction, do people find the will to change. To prevent the triumph of evil, we must confront the truth of its heinous acts. (And frankly, in an honest examination, we are bound to confront the truth of our own misdeeds and shortcomings too. In this process, we must face our own errors with courage and vow to do better.)

Looking ahead: the best is yet to come. We are the insistent voices, holding fast to an idea: life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness. Our nation has drifted far from these fundamental truths. We relinquished God-given rights in favor of cheap entertainment. Unwholesome demands on our time stole our attention and energy. Our compass wavered and we lost our way. We let the Mockingbirds twist words, until the Founders’ ideas seemed a dull phantom.

Your root is strong. Allow it to penetrate into bedrock truth.

What is life? You feel it! Didn’t the breath of God raise you from inert matter into human form?

What is liberty? Discard the mental shackles! Don’t you have the power to create, to imagine, and thereby to change the world?

What is happiness? Is it pleasure or satisfaction? Isn’t it the ability to pursue your dreams and decide your own future?

Trust that there are a lot more people good than bad. Evil has no place here. The world will unite in this cause. Ultimately, love is the force that rescues humanity from darkness.

Fullsized image

Birth Pangs of the National Psyche

Birth Pangs of the National Psyche

by Aspen, ABCU|8 staff writer

Fullsized image

The aftermath of a disputed presidential election is a bitter red pill. Hundreds of instances of ballot fraud have been documented. [1, 5] Numerous lawsuits are pending [4]. Yet Big Tech takes sides against facts with a warning label: “This claim about election fraud is disputed!” [2]

No one is comfortable right now. The unsettled feeling pervades our waking hours, while sleep provides no relief. But the profound discomfort signals a sea change that could bring a new tide of free thought and optimism.

Don’t believe me? Surveys reveal that early voters regret their vote for Joe Biden, after hearing about million-dollar payments to the Biden family from China, Russia, and Ukraine via Hunter Biden. [6] These voters say they would change their vote to Trump if it were possible. Others stubbornly cling to the notion, promoted uniformly by TV anchors, that a candidate who often can’t even formulate a sentence is better qualified to conduct America’s foreign affairs than a successful, high-energy businessman whose aura often flashes genius.

According to Lindsey Graham, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, the hatchet-job to wreck Donald Trump’s reputation began long before his inauguration: “Compare that to the September CIA memo to the FBI suggesting that Hillary Clinton signed off on a plan to link Trump to Russia, to draw attention away from her email server problem. This is our CIA telling the FBI they have credible information and investigative leads that Hillary Clinton, the Democratic nominee, is trying to link Trump to Russia for political purposes and the FBI apparently threw it in the garbage can. Christopher Steele, who was on the payroll of Fusion GPS, who was on the payroll of the Democratic party, provided a dossier that used a Russian source suspected of being a Russian agent years before, that turned out to be a bunch of garbage. The whole idea of Trump/Russia connections was not real, it was manufactured in part by Christopher Steele, and the FBI bought it hook, line and sinker. When the CIA sends information to the FBI that they have intelligence that Hillary Clinton signed off on a plan to connect Trump to Russia to divert attention from her, nobody at the FBI did a damn thing about it.” [8]

What does it mean when the facts don’t square with our beliefs? What if some of the alleged facts are true? What if some of our most trusted news sources have been paid to promote an agenda? If the Biden family could be working for Chinese Communists, who else might be?

This disturbing feeling is cognitive dissonance. What if some of our trusted news sources are actually black hats working to undermine America? Recall the Matrix movie:

“The Matrix is a system, Neo. That system is our enemy. But when you’re inside, you look around, what do you see? Businessmen, teachers, lawyers, carpenters. The very minds of the people we are trying to save. But until we do, these people are still a part of that system and that makes them our enemy. You have to understand, most of these people are not ready to be unplugged. And many of them are so inert, so hopelessly dependent on the system that they will fight to protect it. This is your last chance. After this, there is no turning back. You take the blue pill—the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill—you stay in Wonderland and I show you how deep the rabbit-hole goes. I’m trying to free your mind, Neo. But I can only show you the door. You’re the one that has to walk through it.” [3]

Our belief systems are threatened. It is natural to automatically reject new information that contradicts long-held ideas. It doesn’t take a Matrix argument to understand why America is undergoing collective birth pangs. Painful circumstances are demanding that we re-examine our entrenched beliefs. As our former world view crumbles, let us vow to replace it with a more accurate one predicated upon truth.


1. Election Fraud Compilation, 146 articles,

2. Twitter labels Trump’s latest claim about election fraud as ‘disputed’ but doesn’t limit dissemination,

3. Unforgettable Morpheus Wisdom From The Matrix,

4. E.g.

5. In Wisconsin, between 2 AM and 3:30 AM, the total number of votes increased by 125,000. Of these 125,000 votes, 100% were for Biden, without a single vote for President Trump recorded.

6. Biden Crime Family: Proposed Areas of Collaboration with Chinese Communist Party,

7. Rudy Giuliani, What I Found on Hunter’s Hard Drive,

8. Andrew McCabe Testimony to Senate Judiciary Committee, closing remarks of Lindsey Graham, 11/10/20,



by Aspen – ABCU|8 staff writer

Fullsized image

The war is on! In case you had not noticed.
The prize being fought over? You! Your mind. Your beliefs. Your loyalty to an idea – THEIR idea.
What’s at stake? Only your freedom.

Their weapons? Fake news. Narratives. False reporting. Pretense. Indoctrination. Repetition.
Insidious psychological weapons. Some overt, some subtle.
    Echo Chamber: reinforces beliefs by repetition inside a closed system
It’s a game with a high ante. The big players are all in.
The venue: Mass media. Entertainment programming. TV news. Social media.
    Why are polls emphasized?
    Is it human nature to go along with the majority to feel accepted?

What if the enemy could win without kinetic weapons?
Lure the slaves into their cages. Make them long for their chains.
It sounds too easy. Who would fall for that?
    Very sophisticated optical illusions.
    Reinforced by constant repetition.
    Bombarding you from every side.
They want you to be comfortable in the mental cage prepared for your capture.
Beware! Because the trap is already set. Steel jaws dripping with honeyed poison may snap shut at any moment.
There’s no time to waste! Don’t hesitate. Do you hear the sirens screaming? Distance yourself from mainstream media! Get away!

How do you resist? Or even fight back?
You must become aware of their tactics.
You must reject the poison.
You must think for yourself.
You must elevate your view.
    You are the MAJORITY – by far – and GROWING.
    FAKE NEWS’ purpose is to project FALSE NARRATIVES.
Get your feet out of the swamp!

Come aboard the resistance!
Shun the glossy fake news and its robotic chorus of talking heads.
They are actors reading a script, paid to portray sincerity.
Shun the mass brainwashing.
    What is projected by the MSM?
    LIES becomes TRUTHS.
    TRUTHS become LIES.
    Smoke & Mirrors
    You are the MAJORITY.
    People UNITED & AWAKE is their BIGGEST FEAR.

Do not be lulled by cheap sound bites, like fast food that gratifies without satisfying.
Reject quick takes and easy answers.
Mind-candy is not spiritual comfort food!
Drill deeper to penetrate their flimsy canvas of lies.
Take nothing at face value. Question relentlessly.
Lift the veil!

Find any bit of truth that MSM refuses to cover.
Grab that ticket to freedom.
Use it to check out from the prison.
Did you know that dwelling there is voluntary?

Now sift the truth from the lies.
Ask yourself, if this is true, then WHY does MSM refuse to mention it?
Delve into motivations.
This will illuminate one strut of the cage.

Seek ideas that clash with the narrative.
Not all are true – so evaluate each one in the privacy of your mind.
Pry off the zombie tentacles. See a shackle, take it off!
Let my people GO!

Whatever truths you have found – grasp them tightly!
Then you will not be swept away by the tsunami of lies.
Over time, you become impervious to liars.
You are an independent thinker!

Each truth is a beacon of clarity.
The spotlight of truth shuts down fearmongers’ indignant cries.
Fake News lost its authority long ago.
Each lie we catch them in, diminishes them.
As morning sun dispels a chilly mist
Bring truth, and the illusion fails.
That’s the ticket!

With Recounts and Lawsuits Pending, and Sweeping Evidence of Voter Fraud, It’s Far too Early to Call the Race

With Recounts and Lawsuits Pending, and Sweeping Evidence of Voter Fraud, It’s Far too Early to Call the Race

by John Cleer – ABCU|8

As President Trump tweeted yesterday,

“Joe Biden should not wrongfully claim the office of the President. I could make that claim also. Legal proceedings are just now beginning!” [1]

Trump’s campaign has filed lawsuits in Pennsylvania and Michigan for not allowing votes to be observed, in Georgia for mixing in late ballots with valid ballots and in Nevada for counting votes from out-of-state and dead voters; and they have asked to join the lawsuit against Arizona, for rejecting a ballot on grounds that it was damaged with a Sharpie that the poll worker gave the voter and refusing to give her a new ballot. Pennsylvania is also being sued for changing the law right before the election to allow 3-day late ballots. [2]

Rudy Giuliani has announced that the Trump campaign will file additional voter fraud lawsuits in Philadelphia and Pittsburgh on Monday and that, contrary to the MSM’s aggressive assertions that there is no evidence of fraud, he has 90 poll watchers ready to testify as witnesses. [3]

“Those mail-in ballots [in PA] could have been for anyone they wrote in,” Mr. Giuliani said. “Not a single one was inspected as the law required.” He estimated 300,000 mail-in ballots weren’t inspected in Pittsburgh, and puts that number around 700,000 for the state of Pennsylvania, “the same amount of votes Trump led by in the Keystone State on election night.” (newspaper quoted, not Giuliani) [4]

As in the other swing states, there were numerous irregularities in Michigan but the one with the widest implications is the “glitch” in Dominion Voting Systems, who happen to have donated to the Clinton Foundation and employ Nancy Pelosi’s former Chief of Staff indirectly as a lobbyist.


Dominion’s software changed 6,000 votes from Republican to Democrat in one Michigan county, which were reversed after the county clerk caught the “malfunction”; a similar but unspecified “glitch” in Dominion Systems was discovered and temporarily stopped voting in Georgia.

“Dominion Democracy Suite 5.5” software was in use in 69 Michigan counties on Election day, and in every battleground state. [6]

Furthermore, the Trump Campaign has requested a recount in Wisconsin, Georgia’s Secretary of State has already announced a recount there and the Supreme Court ruled that late ballots in PA must be separated. Trump’s team continues to fight in court to be allowed to observe votes in Pennsylvania, as mandated by Pennsylvania law.

The outcome of the election will depend on the outcome of these and other lawsuits, and it’s safe to say that Biden and the biased media networks are lying or at best, reporting irresponsibly, when they say that he won.

After the MSM “announced” Biden’s victory, Trump said the following:

“We all know why Joe Biden is rushing to falsely pose as the winner, and why his media allies are trying so hard to help him: they don’t want the truth to be exposed. The simple fact is this election is far from over. Joe Biden has not been certified as the winner of any states, let alone any of the highly contested states headed for mandatory recounts, or states where our campaign has valid and legitimate legal challenges that could determine the ultimate victor. In Pennsylvania, for example, our legal observers were not permitted meaningful access to watch the counting process. Legal votes decide who is president, not the news media.

“Beginning Monday, our campaign will start prosecuting our case in court to ensure election laws are fully upheld and the rightful winner is seated. The American People are entitled to an honest election: that means counting all legal ballots, and not counting any illegal ballots. This is the only way to ensure the public has full confidence in our election. It remains shocking that the Biden campaign refuses to agree with this basic principle and wants ballots counted even if they are fraudulent, manufactured, or cast by ineligible or deceased voters. Only a party engaged in wrongdoing would unlawfully keep observers out of the count room – and then fight in court to block their access.

“So what is Biden hiding? I will not rest until the American People have the honest vote count they deserve and that Democracy demands.” [7]

In contrast with these dishonest media networks, the Epoch Times has posted a notice on top of their site that gives their readers an honest picture of how the race will be decided:

“Our nation is moving into uncharted territory as multiple legal challenges have been filed in response to the 2020 elections, with more challenges expected to come.

“Both candidates have claimed victory in certain states, but it appears increasingly likely that this election will be resolved in the courts.

“For that reason, The Epoch Times will not declare a winner of the 2020 presidential election until all results are certified and any legal challenges are resolved.” [8]

The Western Journal, rather than citing legally-contested, dubious vote counts, is posting critical articles acknowledging that “CNN, Fox News, ABC, NBC, CBS, The New York Times and The Associated Press all called the race prematurely” and that “the race is only called when states officially certify their respective election results,” and noting Trump’s strong disagreement with the announcement without disparaging him. They’ve also noted “there is ongoing litigation in Pennsylvania and other states. Officially, the presidential race will likely not be decided for some time, as President Donald Trump is expected to exercise all legal options amid allegations of voting irregularities.” [9]

This is honest reporting, it’s what real journalists do. Ignoring the wealth of evidence that there was (and still is) widespread voter fraud this year and declaring victory in the face of it is a job for partisan lobbyists.

Preemptively attacking claims of voter fraud for years on end leading up to an event like this one, as these same pundits have done, should be seen as a sign of guilt and complicity.











Help Them Leave The Swamp


by Aspen – ABCU|8 staff – American Broadcasting CommUnity

Fullsized image

If you find yourself a few steps ahead of somebody on the path, shine your light on the path so they can see their way.

They are in the swamp. They just discovered it’s a swamp, and they’re having a hard time getting out. Don’t get mad at them for being stuck there. Help them out.

We have all stepped in the mud. It’s the human condition. We are all too familiar with that clammy, sticky, sinking feeling. That heavy feeling of being unsure. Of doubting ourselves. Of questioning how we got here and whether to continue, or turn around now and find a better route. Do we cling to the familiar, or summon our courage and dare to discard false and useless beliefs?

So let’s talk about how. These are people we care about! A wife or husband, parent, sibling, adult child, neighbor. It does no good to berate them for being stuck in a bad place.

Light. That’s what they need. Your radiance will draw them forward.

Arise, shine, for your light has come,
and the glory of the Lord has risen upon you.
For behold, darkness shall cover the earth,
and thick darkness the peoples;
but the Lord will arise upon you,
and his glory will be seen upon you.
And nations shall come to your light,
and kings to the brightness of your rising.
Isaiah 60:1-3 [1]

You don’t have to be a whole encyclopedia of current news and events. Or of timeless truths. Just show them how one thing they thought was true is actually false.

It’s like unravelling a sweater. It doesn’t matter where you start. Keep pulling any loose strand and it’s bound to disintegrate. It’s inevitable! Just find that one angle, and work it.

Who told the lie? Was it a trusted news anchor? A media personality? Can you show that they lied knowingly? That’s how you open Pandora’s Box!

We can perhaps forgive people who tell lies in ignorance. But someone who tells fiction, KNOWING it’s not true? Someone who deliberately misleads thousands or even millions of viewers? That’s a whole different story!

Telling a big lie on purpose invites us to question motivations.

So let’s pick one big lie, as an exercise. Pull out that one card, and watch the whole house of cards collapse!

Why does (insert their favorite media: Fox News, MSNBC, NPR, etc.) tell us Joe Biden is winning an election? The few times Joe emerged from the basement, his rallies were like a ghost town. There is no enthusiasm at all for a Biden presidency. Contrast with President Trump’s rallies. So much energy! Flash mobs assembled on short notice. A sea of red hats everywhere. Amazing energy! A 96 mile parade of “Trump cars” in Arizona. Hundreds of thousands who couldn’t get into the venue, livestreaming each event!

Why does MSM want us to believe Joe Biden is good for America? Why does MSM ignore a mountain of evidence on the Biden Crime Family’s ties to the Chinese Communist Party? [2] Wouldn’t a presidency blackmailed and controlled by China be THE most newsworthy headline? But we don’t see it. MSM won’t cover it.

So think about it! Why would the Big Six media empires want Americans to cringe at the idea of more liberty? To apologize for our values? To kow-tow to Chinese overlords? To relinquish our freedoms in favor of a dystopian nightmare? To raise taxes and wreck the economy, in a return to the squalor and hopelessness of the Obama years?

You see how it’s done? Pick your own example, something you are passionate about. Then keep tugging at that loose yarn.

Together, we expose the lies. Together, we kindle one another’s light. Together, we shall illuminate the path out of the swamp!

Fullsized image



2. Biden Crime Family Ties to Chinese Communist Party. , , , Rudy Giuliani’s Common Sense

Combatting the Attack on Traditional Values

Combatting the Attack on Traditional Values

by American Broadcasting CommUnity – ABCU|8

Traditional values promote the sound functioning of families and strengthen the fabric of society. [2] This is not complicated! Society is comprised of people with finite lifetimes. Thus, society must be continuously regenerated via reproduction to create new individuals.

How do babies acquire the cultural knowledge to mature into adults? They learn by imitation, plus overt teaching from elders.

For thousands of years, the best structure for children’s upbringing is identical to the basic unit of procreation: one male and one female, unified in purpose, and bonded by love into a stable nuclear family. Families are formed to support and nurture kids, and to educate them. Moreover, humans are biologically hard-wired to facilitate nuclear families. Marriage and family may not be for everyone, but it is the natural path for most. Henry Makow, Ph.D., writes, “A woman expresses love in terms of surrender, i.e. trust. She empowers her husband by accepting his leadership, and by believing in him. Women exchange power for love. They want to be dominated by their husband’s love.” “When a woman surrenders to her husband, she gives him the power to grant her wishes, or not. He does not exploit, control or dominate. He respects her individuality and freedom. He wants her to want to be his.He consults and nurtures. He makes the final decision. Every family needs a head. A creature with two heads is a monster.” [4] This is not a religious doctrine, but an accurate insight into human psychology.

Think of culture as a container for passing on the aggregate knowledge and experiences of past generations. It encompasses the social behavior and norms (acceptable conduct) of human societies, as well as the knowledge, beliefs, arts, laws, customs, capabilities, and habits of individuals in these groups. [3] And Western culture is the heritage of social norms, ethical values, traditional customs, belief systems, political systems, artifacts and technologies that originated in Europe, including countries whose histories are strongly connected to Europe by immigration, colonization, or influence. [5]

Ivory-tower academics and social justice warriors demanding automatic rejection of Western culture are really advocating the death of our society. It is ludicrous to expect each generation to reinvent agriculture, science, mathematics, literature, engineering, art, music, etc. from scratch every 20 years. Our vast cultural “memory” is what sets us apart from animals and savages. Instead of rejecting our culture, we should reject the insidious forces that are degrading it.

We are in the advanced stages of a long-term conspiracy to subvert Western civilization. 20th century “modernism” was a hoax designed to strip people of their familial, cultural and religious identity before enslaving them in a new dark age. [1] The central tactic is an anti-family agenda to dissolve the bonds of cohesiveness within society [1]. Social disintegration leads to psychological confusion [1] in which homosexual and transgender confusion are considered chic [4] and even admirable.

Feminism says women should become more like men, seizing tools like aggression and power, rather than employing feminine tools like subtlety and influence that respect men’s natural authority. This in turn robs [castrates] men of their natural role as protector and leader of a family. “Two people cannot become one if they have competing agendas.” [4]

Promiscuity and pornography destroy the intimacy that bonds a man and a woman. “Think of heterosexuality as monogamous and dedicated to rearing children; homosexuality as promiscuous and concerned with sex for its own sake. Porn is creating new generations of heterosexuals who behave like homosexuals” [6] I.e., promiscuously, without the intent to raise a family or pass on the cultural knowledge that underpins society’s continuation.

These and similar tactics cause women and men to reject one another, so that neither can get the love or stability needed for a fulfilling adult life. Without stable nuclear families, what few children are born lack guidance on their roles and responsibilities in society. This, in turn, engenders further cultural degradation.

The way forward is a return to our cultural roots. Founding groups should reassert their values and traditions as the common glue. Minorities should be welcomed, but we should not let them remake society in their own image. [1]

Above all, each person should reexamine their personal attitudes in light of traditional values, lest we inadvertently adopt enemy tactics as our own beliefs. We must study our own culture and embrace what is good in it. Understanding the attacks on Western civilization will enable us to counteract them. By taking our forebears’ wisdom to heart, and incorporating our ancestors’ virtues into our personal lives, we are on a path to rebuild society.


1. []


3. []

4. H. Makow, Wife Must Surrender to Husband to Reach Unity, []

5. []

6. H. Makow, Why All Porn is Gay, []



by Anon

The current battle over social media censorship can be traced back to origins in the CIA’s Project Mockingbird. This article will argue that Project Mockingbird did not terminate after the Cold War but continued when the dot-com bubble enabled social media tech giants to pick up the mantle and continue campaigns of social influence.

The dot-com bubble was not an organic phenomenon. It arose from a more sinister purpose: to achieve a complete takeover of worldwide media and suppress dissenting voices. By whom, you may ask? Did they succeed? We speculate that the bubble was deliberately created, and its entire trajectory planned, to give certain highly-placed insiders absolute control over what has arguably become our most key communications sector. Nowhere is that stranglehold more evident than in today’s battle over social media censorship that is playing out in the run-up to the 2020 presidential election.

But let’s start by examining the bubble as it is typically explained.

“The dot-com bubble was a stock market bubble caused by excessive speculation in Internet-related companies in the late 1990s, a period of massive growth in the use and adoption of the Internet.” [1] The Telecommunications Act of 1996 [2] was expected to generate profitable new technologies. Investors were eager to invest, at any valuation, in any Internet-related company. Venture capital flowed freely, and investment banks profiting from initial public offerings fueled additional speculation by encouraging investment in the sector. Investors overlooked traditional metrics—sky-high debt-to-equity ratios and negligible earnings per share—in hopes of cashing in. Stock prices kept levitating, as hot money rushed into the new sector in a speculative frenzy, creating a bubble that kept inflating. Media commentary hyping the potential of dot-com companies pervaded the airwaves.

Federal government assistance, in the form of venture capital, promoted dozens of key companies in the rapidly-expanding telecomm sector. The bubble made well-placed insiders instant billionaires, enabling them to secure present and future dominance over what has become the most influential communications sector.

Fullsized image


In-Q-Tel (formerly Peleus and In-Q-It) is a not-for-profit venture capital firm in Arlington, Virginia. It invests in high-tech companies for the sole purpose of equipping the Central Intelligence Agency, and other intelligence agencies, with the latest information technology. [3], [4]

IQT was conceived around 1998 as a new way for the CIA to acquire and fund new technologies useful to the national security mission. It was established as a legal entity in February, 1999.

“IQT identifies startups with potential for high impact on national security and works closely with them to deliver new capabilities that our government partners need to boost their technological edge.” Its own website declares that IQT invests in commercially-focused, venture capital-backed startups, identifying and adapting off-the-shelf products capable of deployment in 6 to 36 months. Currently it focuses on data analytics, cybersecurity, AI/machine learning, ubiquitous computing, IT solutions, communications, materials/electronics, the commercialization of space, power & energy, and biotechnology. [5] “IQT works side-by-side with the venture capital community to identify cutting-edge technology that has the potential for commercial success, but more importantly, the potential for high national security impact.”

This approach finds and delivers critical, innovative technology quickly and cost effectively. In-Q-Tel’s private-sector participation, funding, and acquisition of cutting-edge technologies is not necessarily sinister. Like any tool, technology has the potential for good or evil, depending on how it is used. But who has oversight over the independent nonprofit corporation besides its own board of directors?


Operation Mockingbird was a CIA program dating to circa World War II that enlisted journalists, American and worldwide, to spread propaganda—fake news—to manipulate public opinion. [6] (Sound familiar?) Mockingbird enlisted journalists and even clergy in intelligence-gathering roles. Cooperative media companies included CBS, Time, New York Times, ABC, NBC, AP, UPI, Reuters, Hearst Newspapers, Scripps‑Howard, Newsweek, Mutual Broadcasting System, Miami Herald, Saturday Evening Post and New York Herald‑Tribune.

Senator Frank Church’s April 1976 committee uncovered CIA ties to foreign and domestic news media. [7] It also brought to light the existence of the CIA’s infamous heart-attack gun. The Committee heard that former CIA director William Colby had instructed, in 1973, that “as a general policy, the Agency will not make any clandestine use of staff employees of U.S. publications which have a substantial impact or influence on public opinion.” In 1976, then-CIA Director George H. W. Bush announced that the CIA would no longer “enter into any paid or contractual relationship with any full-time or part-time news correspondent accredited by any U.S. news service, newspaper, periodical, radio or television network or station.” Those weasel-words do not rule out delegating such functions to subcontractors, affiliated entities, unaccredited writers, or the use of propaganda in specific instances rather than “as a general policy”.

Pulitzer Prize-winning author Carl Bernstein’s acclaimed exposé uncovering Operation Mockingbird was published in Rolling Stone on October 20, 1977. [8] Did these exposures end the clandestine program, or did it morph into a less-recognizable form? Has the drastic consolidation of media ownership and advent of social media simply become Mockingbird version 2?

How can the public ascertain if past CIA abuses have been rectified and are not occurring through, perhaps, its technology alter-ego IQT, or through public companies that sprang to life when infused with IQT venture capital? The Congressional committee with intelligence oversight responsibility, chaired by Rep. Adam Schiff, has shown it cannot be trusted. Mr. Schiff has lied about classified intelligence with which he was entrusted in his “Gang of Eight” [9] role. In the Trump administration, the CIA is under new management (directors Mike Pompeo, then Gina Haspel). The Director of National Intelligence, John Ratcliffe, is new in that role. Should the American people trust our national security organizations, in light of the long history of past abuses?

Today’s world, rife with fake news, and big tech collecting and selling user information to target the wary public, exhibits striking parallels.


Whose brilliant idea was it to create a honeypot so seductive, so ubiquitous, that people worldwide would commit all their significant life events, people connections, likes and dislikes, photographs, etc. to an online repository? Such a database would surely simplify intelligence-gathering. When the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) of the U.S. Department of Defense conceived the project, they called it LifeLog. Some posit that LifeLog simply burrowed underground by transforming itself into Facebook.

LifeLog’s 2003 bid solicitation proposed “an ontology-based (sub)system that captures, stores, and makes accessible the flow of one person’s experience in and interactions with the world”. It aimed to trace the threads of a person’s life by capturing “all of a subject’s experience, from phone numbers dialed and e-mails viewed to every breath taken, step made and place gone”. [10] It sought to compile a database of every activity and relationship, even credit card purchases, web sites visited, content of telephone calls, e-mails and instant messages, scans of hardcopies faxed or mailed, books and magazines read, television and radio selections, physical location recorded via wearable GPS sensors, and biomedical data from wearable sensors. The purpose was to identify “preferences, plans, goals, and other markers of intentionality” [11] – in other words, to anticipate everything that a person might do as a result of exercising their “free will”. If all causes and effects are identified, could an organization manipulate the causes in order to produce specific effects – i.e. to deprive people of their free will by manipulating everything they see and hear?

The LifeLog program was canceled in February, 2004. [12] In a peculiar “coincidence”, Facebook was launched on February 4, 2004. By 2009, it had become the world’s most used social networking service.[13] Can one prove that Facebook is the direct successor of LifeLog? Can one disprove it? You be the judge.


The existence of extreme censorship and exclusively left-leaning political bias by Big Tech is not debatable—despite testimony from Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, Apple CEO Tim Cook, Google CEO Sundar Pichai, and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg at a July 27, 2020 antitrust hearing, downplaying the practice with virtue-signalling and disingenuous statements on their commitment to serve users.

Insiders and whistleblowers have revealed administrative tools that Twitter uses for censorship. [14] This year Twitter officially admitted its controversial practice of shadowbanning—limiting the distribution or visibility of user posts in a way that’s difficult to detect—via updated terms of service.

Congressman Jim Jordan wrote to Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey in advance of the July 27th hearing seeking data on its censorship practices. “Recent actions suggest that Twitter is increasingly discriminating against conservative voices on its platform,” Jordan wrote. As an example, he cited President Trump’s tweet on absentee voting, which Twitter fact-checkers alleged to contain “potentially misleading information.” Jordan refuted the allegation with facts from the bipartisan Commission on Federal Election Reform, which stated as far back as 2005 that “absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud” in American elections. More recently, Obama’s Commission on Election Administration likewise found that “when [voter fraud] does occur, absentee ballots are often the method of choice.” [15]

Who knows which 3-letter agencies, or their black-budget counterparts, are still entrenched at CIA, In-Q-Tel, Facebook, Twitter, Google, or other social media giants—burrowed in deeply like a blood-sucking tick and lurking in the shadows, while subtly exerting control? Or even worse, have private entities totally outside of government oversight taken over the role of guiding society according to globalist goals?

It does appear that the CIA’s intentions, when it formed Project Mockingbird, were shady at best. Did the marriage of convenience with mainstream media giants turn into an abusive relationship in which MSM and Big Tech got the upper hand, sucking up the venture capital fertilizer and growing beyond expectations, a virtual Jack-and-the-Beanstalk? When examining covert programs, it is difficult to assess intent. Motivations are often concealed under layers of ambiguity and disinformation. It is conceivable, but not absolutely provable, that governmental intelligence-gathering did morph into the social media profiling that infests society today.

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act [16] protects online platforms from liability for their users’ posts. The key phrase says “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” This law has shielded platforms from suit, allowing them to moderate users’ content without responsibility for defamatory content.

With President Trump’s May 28, 2020 executive order [17] declaring internet companies “publishers” when they use their extraordinary powers to regulate speech and inject their own editorial bias by suppressing conservative speech, we are now seeing the next phase of information warfare play out.

The stranglehold that companies like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc. had over information flows played a huge role in political victories by the Radical Left, that resulted in the presidency of Barack Obama and the continued domination by globalist, big-government interests.

Will President Trump’s order to reassert Americans’ first-amendment right of free speech be effective in returning our society to a more balanced posture, where voices from both the Right and the Left have equal opportunities for debate and discourse? Will a new “truth ecosystem” like the American Broadcasting CommUnity (ABCU|8) be effective in freeing us from the oppressive media sector? Can Americans’ moribund acceptance of censorship be overturned through a resurrection of free speech, honest journalism, and courteous, lively debate?


1. Wikipedia, “The Dot-com bubble”,

2. Wikipedia,

3. Wikipedia, “In-Q-Tel”,

4. Central Intelligence Agency, “In-Q-Tel: A New Partnership Between the CIA and the Private Sector,”

5. IQT website,

6. Operation Mockingbird and the CIA’s History of Media Manipulation,

7. Full Documents of Operation Mockingbird,

8. Carl Bernstein, “The CIA and the Media”,

9. The Gang of Eight is a colloquial term for a set of eight leaders within the United States Congress who are briefed on classified intelligence matters by the executive branch.

10. NY Times, “Pentagon Explores a New Frontier In the World of Virtual Intelligence”, May 30, 2003.

11. “DARPA’s bid solicitation for LifeLog”, Internet Archive,

12., “15 Years Ago, the Military Tried to Record Whole Human Lives. It Ended Badly”,

13., “Who Invented Facebook?”,

14., “Leaked screenshots appear to show internal Twitter tool that can blacklist users from search and trends”,

15. Breitbart News, “Jim Jordan Demands Twitter Disclose ‘Extremely Alarming’ Censorship Practices”,

16. “Communications Decency Act”, 47 US Code §230,

17. White House, “Executive Order on Preventing Online Censorship,”

Cognitive Dissonance: The Deep State’s Last Stand?

Cognitive Dissonance: The Deep State’s Last Stand?

by Anon

Fullsized image

People are undergoing a severe existential crisis due to the coexistence—in an identical but impossibly incongruent space—of two opposing and competing sets of information. Both sets simultaneously claim a FACTUAL label, and both are presented by once-trusted mainstream media.

When “facts on the ground” do not match what trusted pundits (seen as “friends”) are saying, the traumatized human mind retreats into a powerful existential protective mode, compelled by the need to maintain even a false sense of sanity.

Friends and loved ones who have long trusted mainstream media pundits, believing them always truthful, are traumatized as it has become very clear, to the awakened, that MSM is lying about literally everything.

Those who continued to trust the MSM, those who cannot reconcile all the glaring externally-verifiable but contradictory “facts” with what MSM tells them, those who cannot fit the glaring contradictory facts-on-the-ground into the same mental space as the mendacious words of their beloved “pundits”, now find their precious but factually-deficient world view forced into an impossible contradiction. How can a trusted world view share mental space with outrageous lies?

They see only two ways to escape. The first will destroy their world view and change their lives forever. The second lets them to keep their flagging world view.

They could abandon their faith in MSM pundits (and along with it, their failing world view), and admit to existential devastation, and choose to see the truth. This would require admitting they have been lied to.

Some will cling to their failing reality at all costs, becoming completely and insanely blind to the obvious. Those whose trauma or fear exceeds their ability to choose the first path descend into cognitive dissonance, becoming blind to reality, no matter how glaring or obvious the incongruity. It is a type of temporary insanity.

Friends and family who witness their loved ones’ astounding descent into insanity should realize they are seeing a sort of crude mental or spiritual survival tactic—a product of our incredibly creative human minds.

For example, this mental survival tactic would serve an innocent child very well (temporarily at least), in allowing the child to survive horrific torture relatively unscathed, as far as visible scars go. In fact, this type of drastic emergency mental protective measure is precisely described by MKUltra mind control techniques and is well understood by the mainstream media, the Deep State, and the CIA. Torture is inflicted on a subject and then a mental “out” is provided to the victim by the torturer. The child chooses the “out” because it is their only means of escape. They can—mentally at least—float above their torture.

It is an example of devils forcing angels to use a last-resort tactic.

In every single MSM newscast, we now see the deliberate and calculated use by the Dark Forces of trauma, to force people into a state of cognitive dissonance. Smiling “friendly” icons purporting to be “allies” deliberately state things which even the most cursory examination of easily-observable truth demonstrates as false. Yet the lies are calmly stated with absolute conviction, behind masks resembling absolute, perfectly-manufactured false sincerity. (Juan on “The Five” with Greg Gutfield on Fox is a prime example of this.)

This forces anyone who hangs onto false hope straight into cognitive dissonance, effectively shutting down any information contradicting the desired narrative. And this is exactly the effect intended by those who are deliberately perpetrating the cognitive dissonance.

Now maybe you can understand why so many people appear to be insane these days.

DHS Study Sheds Light on COVID-19 Best Practices

DHS Study Sheds Light on COVID-19 Best Practices

by: Anon

In March and April, the Department of Homeland Security studied the effect of environmental conditions — temperature, light and humidity — on the COVID-19 virus. [1]

Bill Bryant, director of Science and Technology, presented the findings on April 23, 2020. [2], [3], [4] “Our most striking observation to date is the powerful effect that solar light appears to have on killing the virus — on surfaces and in the air. Increasing the temperature and humidity, or both, is generally less favorable to the virus.”

DHS studied virus survival on non-porous hard surfaces such as door handles and stainless steel. They also studied its survival in aerosols — saliva droplets from sneezes and coughs.

Virus survival is measured in terms of half-life: the interval in which half the virus particles are eliminated.

Fullsized image

Tests on non-porous surfaces:

· (A) On indoor surfaces with 20% (low) humidity and no sunlight, virus survived the longest, with a half-life of 18 hours.

· (B) Raising the humidity to 80% cut the half-life by two-thirds to 6 hours.

· (C) Then raising the temperature to 95°F cut half-life to 1 hour.

· (D) On surfaces in summer-like conditions of 70-75°F, 80% humidity and bright sunlight, half-life was sharply reduced to only 2 minutes. Virus was eliminated over 500 times faster compared with (A).

The same tests were done on respiratory droplets.

· (E) Half-life in aerosols, in 20% humidity, 70-75°F, and no sunlight, was around 60 minutes. That is, virus in aerosols disappeared 18 times faster than on indoor surfaces under conditions (A).

· (F) Adding summer-like sunlight cut the half-life down to about 1.5 minutes. Sunlight eliminated the virus 40 times faster than (E), and 720 times faster than (A).

The virus survives best on surfaces in dry indoor conditions. It does not survive as well in saliva droplets. And it dies the quickest in the presence of direct sunlight under these conditions. Summarizing the aerosol data, Mr. Bryan said, “in a room, 70 to 75 degrees, 20 percent humidity, low humidity, the half-life is about an hour. But you get outside, and it cuts down to a minute and a half. A very significant difference when it gets hit with UV rays. And, Mr. President, while there are many unknown links in the COVID-19 transmission chain, we believe these trends can support practical decision making to lower the risks associated with the virus.”

The data has stunning implications. It suggests that Americans worried about virus can benefit from spending more time outdoors in sunlight, humidity, and warm summer temperatures. It suggests that outdoor mask mandates and prohibition of normal summertime outdoor activities could promote the spread of virus, not contain it.

Mr. Bryan then discussed experiments on disinfecting environmental surfaces. “We’re also testing disinfectants readily available. We’ve tested bleach and isopropyl alcohol on the virus, specifically in saliva or in respiratory fluids. And I can tell you that bleach will kill the virus in five minutes; isopropyl alcohol will kill the virus in 30 seconds, and that’s with no manipulation, no rubbing — just spraying it on and letting it go. If you rub it, it goes away even faster. We’re also looking at other disinfectants, specifically looking at the COVID-19 virus in saliva.”

Fullsized image

· Heat and Humidity Suppress COVID-19 indoors and outdoors

· Move Activities Outside – sunlight impedes virus transmission

· Commonly Available Disinfectants (Bleach & Isopropyl Alcohol) work to kill the virus. (This third point depicting a spray bottle was obviously about disinfecting hard surfaces.)

The mainstream media spun the DHS presentation immediately. [5], [6] The study contradicted the globalists’ goal of forcing heathy individuals to stay indoors and refrain from normal summer activities, with a short-term goal of maximizing the death count and a long-term goal of justifying fraud-laden universal vote-by-mail this autumn.

One article assaulted Mr. Bryan’s integrity by calling him a “non-scientist” and attacking his military background.[7] The writer begs to differ: military background is relevant in defense against biological agents. DHS’s innovative multidisciplinary approach examines problems from all sides, whereas medical research limits itself to a narrow silo where the answer is always more expensive and profitable drugs.

The media instantly jumped on President Trump’s subsequent questions to Mr. Bryan and the task force doctors. The President asked two separate questions [9]:

(1) Whether light could somehow be introduced into the body to kill virus (it can, according to a new treatment protocol) [8]

(2) Whether research should investigate other potential ways to kill virus using disinfectants.

In light of DHS’s “best practices” slide, Mr. Trump’s disinfectant question was obviously about cleaning environmental surfaces. The press maliciously conflated the two separate questions to imply that the President wanted people injected with bleach. By twisting the President’s remarks, plainly intended to spur outside-the-box thinking, the media managed to almost completely sweep this groundbreaking research under the rug.

The First Amendment enshrines our right to discuss these matters freely and to form our own opinions on research that could have a bearing on our health.

In light of the data, shouldn’t we be spending plenty of time outside in sunlight, humidity, and heat, without a mask?


1. DHS initiating crucial research to mitigate COVID-19,


3. Virus does less well in sunlight and warm, humid conditions,

4. DHS Science and Technology Directorate collaborates with CDC, FDA, HHS, and DoD to study, characterize, analyze, and develop countermeasures for biological threats against the homeland

5. ‘Sunlight won’t magic its way into your lungs to fight coronavirus’: Scientists rubbish Donald Trump’s claim hitting the body with UV rays could cure the illness after President rolled out unscrutinised Homeland Security study claiming they kill the virus,

6. Coronavirus dies in SUNLIGHT in minutes, groundbreaking Homeland Security study claims,

7. Homeland Security official who detailed effect of temperature on coronavirus isn’t a scientist but has a long military background,

8. Cedars-Sinai-Developed ‘Healight’ Medical Device Platform Technology Being Studied as a Potential First-in-Class COVID-19 Treatment,

9. THE PRESIDENT: So I asked Bill a question that probably some of you are thinking of, if you’re totally into that world, which I find to be very interesting. So, supposing we hit the body with a tremendous — whether it’s ultraviolet or just very powerful light — and I think you said that that hasn’t been checked, but you’re going to test it. And then I said, supposing you brought the light inside the body, which you can do either through the skin or in some other way, and I think you said you’re going to test that too. It sounds interesting. ACTING UNDER SECRETARY BRYAN: We’ll get to the right folks who could. THE PRESIDENT: Right. And then I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in a minute. One minute. And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning. Because you see it gets in the lungs and it does a tremendous number on the lungs. So it would be interesting to check that. So, that, you’re going to have to use medical doctors with. But it sounds — it sounds interesting to me. So we’ll see. But the whole concept of the light, the way it kills it in one minute, that’s — that’s pretty powerful.

Burning Books One Word at a Time

Burning Books One Word at a Time

by: Anon

Fullsized image

These days our culture is pervaded by lies that are promoted as true. Daily, the Left introduces new distortions of language to support their latest ideology. The debasement of language is not accidental but purposeful. An insidious agenda underpins this trend.

People cannot make sound judgments without a pool of true facts to reason about. When deprived of facts, the resulting cognitive cage is no less a prison. The subversion of language could enslave our minds. Unless we are vigilant, America could be defeated not with a bang but a whimper.

Children quickly learn not to touch a hot stove, or suffer a burn. If new words were substituted, would touching the burner suddenly become safe for believers? Obviously not. Unpopular truths are facts disliked to the point of rejection. But disliking a fact does not make it any less true. Rejecting facts is a characteristic of mental illness. Liberal ideologues want to prohibit consideration of objective truths that do not fit their agenda. “Unpopular truths” are on the chopping block, to be replaced by new “politically correct” expressions.

The mainstream media parrot their globalist masters’ script, while universities and businesses pander to the same ideology. They hope incessant repetition will gain acceptance for the lies, and unpopular truths will be forgotten. We are told that “men” can have menstrual periods and bear children. That censorship of conservatives by Big Tech isn’t censorship, if it serves the interest of globalists. That cross-dressing or surgery changes a person’s sex. That burning down a federal courthouse is a peaceful demonstration. That corrupt and demented senior Joe Biden could run the country. That Islam is a religion of peace. That victimhood is a noble and desirable condition. And many believe.

Schools, libraries, and other publicly-funded institutions boost the new dogmas. Grotesque transvestites are presented as role models. Abhorrent sexual practices that our grandparents could never have imagined are introduced to first-graders by mandated “diversity” curricula. How can we teach our children right from wrong, when the TV mocks us for explaining that burning down public buildings and rioting are not good ways to solve problems? Should parents yield control over raising our children to cultural Marxists?

One of the most powerful neologisms is “hate speech”. This category is used to terrorize people into self-censorship. Once an idea is branded “hate speech”, those who speak it can be demonized and even prosecuted under unconstitutional laws. But “hate speech” is merely speech that others hate. Our First Amendment protects all speech: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” The only exceptions are inciting acts of violence or endangering the masses with one’s words.

What is at stake is only our free will, national independence, and right to personal uniqueness. We must not be coerced by “politically-correct” language bullies. We need to embrace the truth. While crying “diversity”, the globalists promote conformity. The trend to homogeneity of thought and language flouts everything that past generations of Americans fought to preserve. A free society is one in which vigorous debate flourishes, not the monoculture of ideas that the Left would compel under the insincere banner of “diversity”.

A splinter minority hopes to overrule the silent majority. And if we remain silent, they might. It is time to become vocal. Our Constitution empowers us with freedom of speech. We need to reject the lies and insist on the truth, in our private interactions and in all public discourse. We need to be loud. We need to overcome our reticence, and speak out. Truth is the only cure.

Joe Biden is a Rapist and I Want You to Vote for Him

Joe Biden is a Rapist and I Want You to Vote for Him

by John Cleer

The New York Times actually published this argument (wording it “I Believe Tara Reade. I’m voting for Joe Biden anyway … suck it up and make the utilitarian bargain”) in an Op-Ed ( 1 ) and by all appearances, they agree with it. Stranger yet, a good cross-section of their readers do, as evidenced in the Letters to the Editor ( 2 ) and by the lack of much push-back, if any, to the article.

But only two years ago, this same newspaper viciously attacked Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, publishing numerous articles ( 3 ) around the argument that there is an ethical obligation to “believe women” which makes Kavanaugh guilty, because he was accused by a woman. From there it followed that Kavanaugh must not be permitted to serve on the Supreme Court.

Now hold on, you might be saying, op-ed writers are not affiliated with the newspaper’s editorial board. This is technically true, but the writer Linda Hirshman has been a steady presence on the liberal circuit for years now and this includes the New York Times. They announced her daughter’s wedding in the Style section in 2003 ( 4 ) and have published Linda’s op-eds periodically for more than 10 years ( 5 ); longtime columnist David Brooks name-dropped her at the top of his column nearly 15 years ago, starting a public back-and-forth that generated publicity for her, an unknown writer, in the lead-up to her first book release. ( 6 ) The Times have since plugged all three of her books ( 7 ), which make the bestseller list now — she’s part of the club, thanks in part to David Brooks, and has had a long relationship with the “paper of record” that continued with this op-ed.

Katha Pollitt wrote an article for The Nation just like the Times’, and they too published it: “I would vote for Joe Biden even if I believed Reade’s account… I would vote for Joe Biden if he boiled babies and ate them.” ( 8 ) What if he boiled YOUR baby and ate it, Katha Pollitt? Would you vote for him then?

The Atlantic took a more honest step back before launching into the same: “Condemning Biden carries a clear cost for these groups. They believe that four more years of Trump would be immensely damaging for their policy agendas and for women in general,” leading in to another feminist writer explaining why she defends Biden against Reade and you should too. ( 9 ) “For women in general,” that is.

All three of these outlets pushed for Kavanaugh’s removal and yet today, all three are publishing reasons it’s different with Biden. Reade is lying, or they believe her but their political vision for the country (“beating Trump”) is more important. So Biden may be a rapist, and that’s ok now—sometimes that’s what women need, right New York Times?

This discrepancy is trending across the liberal media, who only two years ago would’ve called *you* a rapist if you wanted Kavanaugh’s accusations corroborated. Bloodthirsty, determined and certain of their moral high ground, the Left chanted “We Believe Her” (referring to his accuser Christine Blasey Ford, who says he tried to rape her 37 years ago) in unison, incessantly, for months. The year before, similar decades-old accusations were lobbed against Republican Senate candidate Roy Moore. If these people are truly concerned about the victims, then shouldn’t they apply this standard to both sides of the political aisle? Surely they’d agree that candidates for president should be held to it.

Don’t ask Joe Biden—he doesn’t always know he’s running for president. ( 10 ) But if he wins, “[his] first priority as president will be defeating Donald Trump.” ( 11 ) He’s forgotten what state he was in, on camera, in 3 different states in this campaign alone. Do reporters hold Biden accountable for these lapses, or do they surreptitiously ignore them? He’s forgotten what day of the week it is and even which half-century he’s in, telling parents to “make sure you have the record player on at night” for their kids. He’s forgotten what college he went to, claiming falsely he attended historically-black Delaware State when he attended the University of Delaware. He’s forgotten who was on the stage with him at a Democratic debate, saying in front of Kamala Harris that he was endorsed by the only African-American woman in the Senate. Astonishingly Biden’s even forgotten the Declaration of Independence, on stage in the midst of reciting it: “All men and women are created by the … you know … you know the thing.” ( 12 ) And every time he does it, he gets a pass.

In striking similarity, Ford doesn’t know what city she says she was almost raped in, what year it was, whose house it happened in or who was there with her. ( 13 ) Her only records are her therapist’s notes which were taken 30 years later and conflict with the year she gave the Washington Post as an estimation ( 14 ) (compared to Kavanaugh’s daily notes which are meticulous and taken in his own hand, in real time on the dates in question ( 15 )). None of the three witnesses Ford named can remember the party ( 16 )and one of them says “I don’t have any confidence in the story,” and can’t recall ever having met Kavanaugh. ( 17 )

Ford has also demonstrated a penchant for lying under oath, or at best remembering things in different ways than everyone else does. After she suggested that a polygraph test she’d taken proves she’s telling the truth, Ford’s ex-boyfriend wrote a letter to the Judiciary Committee disputing a number of her claims on the stand: in the six years he says they dated, she did not seem afraid of flying or enclosed spaces and more pertinently, she had indeed coached her friend on passing a polygraph test for a job opportunity. ( 18 )

“Dr. Ford explained in detail what to expect, how polygraphs worked and helped [her friend] McLean become familiar and less nervous about the exam. Dr. Ford was able to help because of her background in psychology,” he wrote in response to Ford’s claim on the stand that she had “never” “taken any other polygraphs in [her] life” or “had discussions with anyone besides [her] attorneys on how to take a polygraph,” nor had she “ever given tips or advice to anyone who was looking to take a polygraph test.” This would mean she not only perjured herself but is a studied or even professional liar, at least in regards to manipulating polygraphs. ( 19 )

Mr. Biden’s accuser, Tara Reade, claimed her mother called the Larry King Show after Tara left Biden’s office to talk about the alleged rape: this claim has been corroborated by the tape being found. Reade also has eight contemporaneous corroborating witnesses who confirmed her account. ( 20 ) So under the “Believe Women” mantra, which does not even require evidence, Mr. Biden’s cancellation should be a shoe-in.

But a funny thing is happening this time: instead of finding more victims to parade, the media can now only find staffers who will defend Biden. There were over 40 witnesses ready to testify negatively about Kavanaugh to the FBI ( 21 ), but for some reason with Biden, they can only find staffers who will sing his praise. PBS found 74 of them ( 22 ), opening their article by asserting he was not on a particular list of “creepy” senators, then conceding he was “also a toucher, seemingly oblivious to whether physical contact made some women uncomfortable.” You see, *he* didn’t make them uncomfortable, it was physical contact in general that did this, and in this case it just happened to come from Joe Biden. As PBS tells it, Mr. Biden was just being himself, and these women were touchy about it.

With Biden under the gun instead of Kavanaugh, the press is suddenly interested in evidence and credibility, and whether an allegation has any. “Believe Women” has become “we never meant ‘believe *all* women.’”

“That’s a Right-Wing trap!,” says the New York Times, and a “canard.” “Believe All Women” is the negation of “Believe Women,” wrote the writer, decrying it as a “double standard purity test.” But instead of disproving the double standard, the writer just says conservatives are hypocrites too. ( 23 )

Let me point out that this is very much a double standard (and a “canard” for that matter, if it’s possible to use the word honestly). Kavanaugh was convicted in the public forum by paid lobbyists of all stripes ( 24 ) who insisted that he was guilty, because otherwise you’d be calling Ford a liar. It was impossible that Ford could be lying, only a rapist would say that! But there is no parallel concern for Tara Reade—Politico for example published a hit piece characterizing her as “manipulative, deceitful” and desperate for money. ( 25 )

California prosecutors have even launched an investigation into whether she lied on the stand. What do they accuse her of lying about? Having graduated from college. ( 26 ) In other words, the supposed lie has nothing to do with her experience with Biden, and they are accusing her misleadingly—and using the power of the court to silence her, in order to protect the alleged rapist Mr. Biden.

It’s acceptable to treat Tara Reade like this because she’s accusing a Democrat. Conservatives get the Kavanaugh Treatment, where wildly unsubstantiated and relatively mild allegations are treated as fact and guilt is assumed. Kavanaugh allegedly “groped” Ford and tried to remove her clothes (no specifics given) and put his hand on her mouth as if to quiet her. ( 27 ) Clarence Thomas before him allegedly made unwelcome comments.

Joe Biden by contrast is accused of reaching under Reade’s skirt and jamming his fingers inside her ( 28 ), against her will, and then telling her “You’re nothing to me” as he walked away ( 29 ). Somehow the Kavanaugh and Thomas allegations were treated much more seriously than this. In Tara Reade’s case it’s even acceptable to say, “Joe Biden raped her and it doesn’t matter, we need to vote for him.” Imagine a reporter saying this about Blase Ford, in Supreme Court season, without losing their job and getting blacklisted. What happened to “We believe her”? It was a lie, Ford was a liar and everyone knew it. They knew she was lying and they used her.

The reality of these frenzied accusations and the “feminist” journalists who push them in the magazines, as the Atlantic briefly acknowledged ( 30 ), is they are political tools. Whoever runs the media has no problem defending a rapist, attacking a rape victim, or slandering a good man with false accusations, and their whore employees will do anything for a dollar.


1. “I Believe Tara Reade. I’m Voting for Joe Biden Anyway. The importance of owning an ugly moral choice.” Linda Hirshman, New York Times.





6. Ibid. 7. Ibid.

8. “We Should Take Women’s Accusations Seriously. But Tara Reade’s Fall Short.” Katha Pollit, The Nation.

9. “Is It Fair to Compare Joe Biden to Brett Kavanaugh? A candid conversation with the president of the National Women’s Law Center” Emma Green, The Atlantic.

10. (Biden says he’s running for Senate) “The Biden Gaffe Machine: A Running List Of Joe Biden’s Best Slip-Ups.” Tristan Justice, The Federalist.

11. “Joe Biden Gaffe: My First Priority as President Would Be to Defeat Trump.” Joshua Caplan, Breitbart.



14. “Ford attorneys offer notes from therapy in exchange for FBI interview. Brett Samuels, The Hill.

15. “Kavanaugh lawyer calls for accuser’s legal team to submit polygraph and therapist notes to Senate.” Gabriella Munoz, Washington Times.

16. “4 new witnesses for Christine Blasey Ford don’t really corroborate her claim against Kavanaugh.” Becket Adams, Examiner.

17. “‘Just didn’t make any sense’: Friend of Kavanaugh accuser Christine Blasey Ford now challenges her story” Jerry Dunleavy, Examiner.

18. “Report: Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s Ex-Boyfriend Says She Coached A Friend Before Taking A Polygraph Test.” Mike Brest, Daily Caller.

19. Ibid.

20. “Tara Reade Gets Another Corroborating Witness, Total Reaches 8.” John Nolte, Breitbart.

21. “FBI has not contacted dozens of potential sources in Kavanaugh investigation.” Caldwell & Przybyla, NBC News.

22. “What 74 former Biden staffers think about Tara Reade’s allegations.” Daniel Bush, PBS. 23. “Believe All Women’ Is a Right-Wing Trap.” Susan Faludi, New York Times.

24. (Advocacy groups raised seven-figure war chests, warning that Judge Kavanaugh poses an existential threat to abortion rights, the Affordable Care Act and checks on presidential power.) “‘So, So Jaded’: The Campaign to Stop Brett Kavanaugh Struggles for Liftoff.” Fandos & Edmondson, New York Times. (

25. “‘Manipulative, deceitful, user’: Tara Reade left a trail of aggrieved acquaintances.” Natasha Korecki, Politico.

26. “Biden sex assault accuser Tara Reade allegedly lied about her education, prompting a review of her expert witness work.” Nicole Darrah, The Sun.


(28.) “Biden accuser Tara Reade claims he pinned her to a wall and said ‘I want to f*** you’ – as she demands he exits race.” Chris Spargo, The Sun.

29. “The #MeToo hypocrites who’ve gone silent for Joe Biden.” Maureen Callahan, New York Post.

30. Green, The Atlantic.