America Needs Truth Therapy

America Needs Truth Therapy

by Aspen – ABCU|8 team

Fullsized image

Our world is truth-starved. Truth is non-negotiable. It is my bottom line, and it should be your bottom line. No matter what your faith (or no faith), the practice of truth is fundamental. There can be no logic, without a set of facts upon which logic depends.

―Christian: “I am the way, and the truth, and the life” [1]
―Buddhist: Remove all ideas and concepts, in order for the truth to have a chance to reveal itself. [2]
―Hindu: A truthful person must be a practitioner of truth in word and deed. [6]
―None of the Above: “If you tell the truth, you don’t have to remember anything.” ― Mark Twain [5]
―“The truth will set you free, but first it will piss you off.” ― Joe Klaas, Twelve Steps to Happiness [5]

Are all truths empirically verifiable? Of course not. Some arise through contemplation, discernment, or logic. Although human sensory perception can be tricked by optical illusions that game our nervous system’s chemical reactions [7], we must not abandon our embrace of truth.

Just how far has society strayed from truth? The mainstream media can no longer be trusted. “The press in our country no longer seek to record events and report them. They seek to shape events.” Rep. Matt Gaetz [3] Big Tech employs ‘fact checkers’ whose job is what George Orwell called ‘thought police’. By limiting what may be said in public discourse, these deep-state minions―these leftist desk-jockey mercenaries―aim to completely extinguish our freedom of speech.

The MSM is now a full-fledged propaganda arm of the Marxists. They will NOT tell the truth outside of their narrative. And the purpose of their narrative is to create a compliant slave population who will follow orders like obedient sheep, willingly relinquishing every right that our Constitution and Bill of Rights affords us. [4] And we are shamed if we resist.

“Congress is not going to rein in Big Tech, because Congress is bought by Big Tech,” Rep. Matt Gaetz said. “There are just simply too many members of the House and Senate who are beholden to Big Tech either because of political donations or because their family members are getting employed by Big Tech.” [8]

Small lies that people shrugged off as commonplace―e.g. calling in sick to get a day off from work when you are not sick―have been replaced by enormous lies that serve the globalist agenda. Consider global warming, for one example. It’s a lie underpinned by falsified data that has been thoroughly debunked, yet remains widely believed due relentless propaganda [9]. Is it really necessary for scientists to exaggerate to get our attention? Or does that set a really bad precedent?

Our ability to make accurate judgments and to plan for the future becomes compromised when the data we believe is false. False data undercuts our reasoning power, and thereby destroys free will. When we lose free will, we are slaves. And when the slaves don’t even know they’re slaves, all is lost.

The solution? Truth therapy. We must become relentless in our pursuit of truth. We must relearn forgotten skills. We must go outside the system to ascertain facts for ourselves. That means taking responsibility to read, listen, view, research. Real news exhibits courteous controversy between reasoned viewpoints. Real news includes incomplete information and differing vantage points, as well as opinions arising from different backgrounds and life experiences. That means rejecting predigested viewpoints and actually thinking for ourselves.

If a mainstream media outlet is found to be lying, then we must deny it the power to influence us ever again, by disregarding it. The same is true for elected officials, scientists, educators, celebrities, etc. And we must become a light that shares truth with others, giving them the opportunity to resurrect long-suppressed reasoning skills. “No one lights a lamp and then puts it under a basket. Instead, a lamp is placed on a stand, where it gives light to everyone in the house.” [10] Be the light; insist on truth!

Fullsized image


1. Holy Bible, John 14:6,

2. Thich Nhat Hanh,

3. Thoughts from a Common Man,

4. Know Your Rights,


6. Truth According to Hinduism,

7. Thomas Schoenberger, Brain Apple – A video to enhance concentration, clarity and focus,

8. Congress Not Going to Rein in Big Tech, Congress is Owned by Big Tech,

9. Why Apocalyptic Claims About Climate Change Are Wrong,

10. Holy Bible, Matthew 5:15,

Freedom Seeds

Freedom Seeds

Fullsized image

by Aspen – ABCU|8 team

Before people started to notice, you felt it. With a little tickle, something awoke in fertile soil at the back of your mind. It’s always been there, able to germinate at any time, pending the right conditions.

What quickens a freedom seed? Love. It’s really that simple: it responds to love. When did it start? Did you notice the new possibilities first, or were you tired of being stuck in a rut? Or was it the insistent cumulative vibration of hive-mind peers that jolted you out of a suffocating dream?

That’s the sound of the great awakening. It’s affecting every one of us in unforeseen ways.

Imagine if the world chose a different path, a better path. “Love one another, as I have loved you,” Jesus said. Trusting the promise, the seed spontaneously extends toward the light, with neither fear nor longing, only the natural gesture of growth. Bathed in divine radiance, its inner nature silently unfolds, extending into a perceptible presence. In an atmosphere of love, even arrested development must proceed inexorably toward maturity. The luminosity of our love benefits others in unfathomable ways.

“For I know the plans I have for you,” declares the LORD, “plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future.” In a burgeoning chorus, your seed hears other seeds activating, like the strident voices of spring peepers singing out from a shallow pond. But we are speaking of an invisible web of the spirit, transporting vibrations of the heart. Nothing can stop what is coming! Our shared dream cannot be crushed or silenced. You are not alone; you were never alone.

Peek into the rear-view mirror at the detritus left behind. Collectively, humanity is turning the page on a reprehensible chapter where evil was allowed to thrive. In darkness, its deeds remained hidden, and it flourished. Its dark coils tightened ever so gradually that we remained unaware. Vampire-like, evil shuns exposure. “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing,” wrote Edmund Burke. Only now, at the precipice of destruction, do people find the will to change. To prevent the triumph of evil, we must confront the truth of its heinous acts. (And frankly, in an honest examination, we are bound to confront the truth of our own misdeeds and shortcomings too. In this process, we must face our own errors with courage and vow to do better.)

Looking ahead: the best is yet to come. We are the insistent voices, holding fast to an idea: life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness. Our nation has drifted far from these fundamental truths. We relinquished God-given rights in favor of cheap entertainment. Unwholesome demands on our time stole our attention and energy. Our compass wavered and we lost our way. We let the Mockingbirds twist words, until the Founders’ ideas seemed a dull phantom.

Your root is strong. Allow it to penetrate into bedrock truth.

What is life? You feel it! Didn’t the breath of God raise you from inert matter into human form?

What is liberty? Discard the mental shackles! Don’t you have the power to create, to imagine, and thereby to change the world?

What is happiness? Is it pleasure or satisfaction? Isn’t it the ability to pursue your dreams and decide your own future?

Trust that there are a lot more people good than bad. Evil has no place here. The world will unite in this cause. Ultimately, love is the force that rescues humanity from darkness.

Fullsized image

Birth Pangs of the National Psyche

Birth Pangs of the National Psyche

by Aspen, ABCU|8 staff writer

Fullsized image

The aftermath of a disputed presidential election is a bitter red pill. Hundreds of instances of ballot fraud have been documented. [1, 5] Numerous lawsuits are pending [4]. Yet Big Tech takes sides against facts with a warning label: “This claim about election fraud is disputed!” [2]

No one is comfortable right now. The unsettled feeling pervades our waking hours, while sleep provides no relief. But the profound discomfort signals a sea change that could bring a new tide of free thought and optimism.

Don’t believe me? Surveys reveal that early voters regret their vote for Joe Biden, after hearing about million-dollar payments to the Biden family from China, Russia, and Ukraine via Hunter Biden. [6] These voters say they would change their vote to Trump if it were possible. Others stubbornly cling to the notion, promoted uniformly by TV anchors, that a candidate who often can’t even formulate a sentence is better qualified to conduct America’s foreign affairs than a successful, high-energy businessman whose aura often flashes genius.

According to Lindsey Graham, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, the hatchet-job to wreck Donald Trump’s reputation began long before his inauguration: “Compare that to the September CIA memo to the FBI suggesting that Hillary Clinton signed off on a plan to link Trump to Russia, to draw attention away from her email server problem. This is our CIA telling the FBI they have credible information and investigative leads that Hillary Clinton, the Democratic nominee, is trying to link Trump to Russia for political purposes and the FBI apparently threw it in the garbage can. Christopher Steele, who was on the payroll of Fusion GPS, who was on the payroll of the Democratic party, provided a dossier that used a Russian source suspected of being a Russian agent years before, that turned out to be a bunch of garbage. The whole idea of Trump/Russia connections was not real, it was manufactured in part by Christopher Steele, and the FBI bought it hook, line and sinker. When the CIA sends information to the FBI that they have intelligence that Hillary Clinton signed off on a plan to connect Trump to Russia to divert attention from her, nobody at the FBI did a damn thing about it.” [8]

What does it mean when the facts don’t square with our beliefs? What if some of the alleged facts are true? What if some of our most trusted news sources have been paid to promote an agenda? If the Biden family could be working for Chinese Communists, who else might be?

This disturbing feeling is cognitive dissonance. What if some of our trusted news sources are actually black hats working to undermine America? Recall the Matrix movie:

“The Matrix is a system, Neo. That system is our enemy. But when you’re inside, you look around, what do you see? Businessmen, teachers, lawyers, carpenters. The very minds of the people we are trying to save. But until we do, these people are still a part of that system and that makes them our enemy. You have to understand, most of these people are not ready to be unplugged. And many of them are so inert, so hopelessly dependent on the system that they will fight to protect it. This is your last chance. After this, there is no turning back. You take the blue pill—the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill—you stay in Wonderland and I show you how deep the rabbit-hole goes. I’m trying to free your mind, Neo. But I can only show you the door. You’re the one that has to walk through it.” [3]

Our belief systems are threatened. It is natural to automatically reject new information that contradicts long-held ideas. It doesn’t take a Matrix argument to understand why America is undergoing collective birth pangs. Painful circumstances are demanding that we re-examine our entrenched beliefs. As our former world view crumbles, let us vow to replace it with a more accurate one predicated upon truth.


1. Election Fraud Compilation, 146 articles,

2. Twitter labels Trump’s latest claim about election fraud as ‘disputed’ but doesn’t limit dissemination,

3. Unforgettable Morpheus Wisdom From The Matrix,

4. E.g.

5. In Wisconsin, between 2 AM and 3:30 AM, the total number of votes increased by 125,000. Of these 125,000 votes, 100% were for Biden, without a single vote for President Trump recorded.

6. Biden Crime Family: Proposed Areas of Collaboration with Chinese Communist Party,

7. Rudy Giuliani, What I Found on Hunter’s Hard Drive,

8. Andrew McCabe Testimony to Senate Judiciary Committee, closing remarks of Lindsey Graham, 11/10/20,



by Aspen – ABCU|8 staff writer

Fullsized image

The war is on! In case you had not noticed.
The prize being fought over? You! Your mind. Your beliefs. Your loyalty to an idea – THEIR idea.
What’s at stake? Only your freedom.

Their weapons? Fake news. Narratives. False reporting. Pretense. Indoctrination. Repetition.
Insidious psychological weapons. Some overt, some subtle.
    Echo Chamber: reinforces beliefs by repetition inside a closed system
It’s a game with a high ante. The big players are all in.
The venue: Mass media. Entertainment programming. TV news. Social media.
    Why are polls emphasized?
    Is it human nature to go along with the majority to feel accepted?

What if the enemy could win without kinetic weapons?
Lure the slaves into their cages. Make them long for their chains.
It sounds too easy. Who would fall for that?
    Very sophisticated optical illusions.
    Reinforced by constant repetition.
    Bombarding you from every side.
They want you to be comfortable in the mental cage prepared for your capture.
Beware! Because the trap is already set. Steel jaws dripping with honeyed poison may snap shut at any moment.
There’s no time to waste! Don’t hesitate. Do you hear the sirens screaming? Distance yourself from mainstream media! Get away!

How do you resist? Or even fight back?
You must become aware of their tactics.
You must reject the poison.
You must think for yourself.
You must elevate your view.
    You are the MAJORITY – by far – and GROWING.
    FAKE NEWS’ purpose is to project FALSE NARRATIVES.
Get your feet out of the swamp!

Come aboard the resistance!
Shun the glossy fake news and its robotic chorus of talking heads.
They are actors reading a script, paid to portray sincerity.
Shun the mass brainwashing.
    What is projected by the MSM?
    LIES becomes TRUTHS.
    TRUTHS become LIES.
    Smoke & Mirrors
    You are the MAJORITY.
    People UNITED & AWAKE is their BIGGEST FEAR.

Do not be lulled by cheap sound bites, like fast food that gratifies without satisfying.
Reject quick takes and easy answers.
Mind-candy is not spiritual comfort food!
Drill deeper to penetrate their flimsy canvas of lies.
Take nothing at face value. Question relentlessly.
Lift the veil!

Find any bit of truth that MSM refuses to cover.
Grab that ticket to freedom.
Use it to check out from the prison.
Did you know that dwelling there is voluntary?

Now sift the truth from the lies.
Ask yourself, if this is true, then WHY does MSM refuse to mention it?
Delve into motivations.
This will illuminate one strut of the cage.

Seek ideas that clash with the narrative.
Not all are true – so evaluate each one in the privacy of your mind.
Pry off the zombie tentacles. See a shackle, take it off!
Let my people GO!

Whatever truths you have found – grasp them tightly!
Then you will not be swept away by the tsunami of lies.
Over time, you become impervious to liars.
You are an independent thinker!

Each truth is a beacon of clarity.
The spotlight of truth shuts down fearmongers’ indignant cries.
Fake News lost its authority long ago.
Each lie we catch them in, diminishes them.
As morning sun dispels a chilly mist
Bring truth, and the illusion fails.
That’s the ticket!

With Recounts and Lawsuits Pending, and Sweeping Evidence of Voter Fraud, It’s Far too Early to Call the Race

With Recounts and Lawsuits Pending, and Sweeping Evidence of Voter Fraud, It’s Far too Early to Call the Race

by John Cleer – ABCU|8

As President Trump tweeted yesterday,

“Joe Biden should not wrongfully claim the office of the President. I could make that claim also. Legal proceedings are just now beginning!” [1]

Trump’s campaign has filed lawsuits in Pennsylvania and Michigan for not allowing votes to be observed, in Georgia for mixing in late ballots with valid ballots and in Nevada for counting votes from out-of-state and dead voters; and they have asked to join the lawsuit against Arizona, for rejecting a ballot on grounds that it was damaged with a Sharpie that the poll worker gave the voter and refusing to give her a new ballot. Pennsylvania is also being sued for changing the law right before the election to allow 3-day late ballots. [2]

Rudy Giuliani has announced that the Trump campaign will file additional voter fraud lawsuits in Philadelphia and Pittsburgh on Monday and that, contrary to the MSM’s aggressive assertions that there is no evidence of fraud, he has 90 poll watchers ready to testify as witnesses. [3]

“Those mail-in ballots [in PA] could have been for anyone they wrote in,” Mr. Giuliani said. “Not a single one was inspected as the law required.” He estimated 300,000 mail-in ballots weren’t inspected in Pittsburgh, and puts that number around 700,000 for the state of Pennsylvania, “the same amount of votes Trump led by in the Keystone State on election night.” (newspaper quoted, not Giuliani) [4]

As in the other swing states, there were numerous irregularities in Michigan but the one with the widest implications is the “glitch” in Dominion Voting Systems, who happen to have donated to the Clinton Foundation and employ Nancy Pelosi’s former Chief of Staff indirectly as a lobbyist.


Dominion’s software changed 6,000 votes from Republican to Democrat in one Michigan county, which were reversed after the county clerk caught the “malfunction”; a similar but unspecified “glitch” in Dominion Systems was discovered and temporarily stopped voting in Georgia.

“Dominion Democracy Suite 5.5” software was in use in 69 Michigan counties on Election day, and in every battleground state. [6]

Furthermore, the Trump Campaign has requested a recount in Wisconsin, Georgia’s Secretary of State has already announced a recount there and the Supreme Court ruled that late ballots in PA must be separated. Trump’s team continues to fight in court to be allowed to observe votes in Pennsylvania, as mandated by Pennsylvania law.

The outcome of the election will depend on the outcome of these and other lawsuits, and it’s safe to say that Biden and the biased media networks are lying or at best, reporting irresponsibly, when they say that he won.

After the MSM “announced” Biden’s victory, Trump said the following:

“We all know why Joe Biden is rushing to falsely pose as the winner, and why his media allies are trying so hard to help him: they don’t want the truth to be exposed. The simple fact is this election is far from over. Joe Biden has not been certified as the winner of any states, let alone any of the highly contested states headed for mandatory recounts, or states where our campaign has valid and legitimate legal challenges that could determine the ultimate victor. In Pennsylvania, for example, our legal observers were not permitted meaningful access to watch the counting process. Legal votes decide who is president, not the news media.

“Beginning Monday, our campaign will start prosecuting our case in court to ensure election laws are fully upheld and the rightful winner is seated. The American People are entitled to an honest election: that means counting all legal ballots, and not counting any illegal ballots. This is the only way to ensure the public has full confidence in our election. It remains shocking that the Biden campaign refuses to agree with this basic principle and wants ballots counted even if they are fraudulent, manufactured, or cast by ineligible or deceased voters. Only a party engaged in wrongdoing would unlawfully keep observers out of the count room – and then fight in court to block their access.

“So what is Biden hiding? I will not rest until the American People have the honest vote count they deserve and that Democracy demands.” [7]

In contrast with these dishonest media networks, the Epoch Times has posted a notice on top of their site that gives their readers an honest picture of how the race will be decided:

“Our nation is moving into uncharted territory as multiple legal challenges have been filed in response to the 2020 elections, with more challenges expected to come.

“Both candidates have claimed victory in certain states, but it appears increasingly likely that this election will be resolved in the courts.

“For that reason, The Epoch Times will not declare a winner of the 2020 presidential election until all results are certified and any legal challenges are resolved.” [8]

The Western Journal, rather than citing legally-contested, dubious vote counts, is posting critical articles acknowledging that “CNN, Fox News, ABC, NBC, CBS, The New York Times and The Associated Press all called the race prematurely” and that “the race is only called when states officially certify their respective election results,” and noting Trump’s strong disagreement with the announcement without disparaging him. They’ve also noted “there is ongoing litigation in Pennsylvania and other states. Officially, the presidential race will likely not be decided for some time, as President Donald Trump is expected to exercise all legal options amid allegations of voting irregularities.” [9]

This is honest reporting, it’s what real journalists do. Ignoring the wealth of evidence that there was (and still is) widespread voter fraud this year and declaring victory in the face of it is a job for partisan lobbyists.

Preemptively attacking claims of voter fraud for years on end leading up to an event like this one, as these same pundits have done, should be seen as a sign of guilt and complicity.











Help Them Leave The Swamp


by Aspen – ABCU|8 staff – American Broadcasting CommUnity

Fullsized image

If you find yourself a few steps ahead of somebody on the path, shine your light on the path so they can see their way.

They are in the swamp. They just discovered it’s a swamp, and they’re having a hard time getting out. Don’t get mad at them for being stuck there. Help them out.

We have all stepped in the mud. It’s the human condition. We are all too familiar with that clammy, sticky, sinking feeling. That heavy feeling of being unsure. Of doubting ourselves. Of questioning how we got here and whether to continue, or turn around now and find a better route. Do we cling to the familiar, or summon our courage and dare to discard false and useless beliefs?

So let’s talk about how. These are people we care about! A wife or husband, parent, sibling, adult child, neighbor. It does no good to berate them for being stuck in a bad place.

Light. That’s what they need. Your radiance will draw them forward.

Arise, shine, for your light has come,
and the glory of the Lord has risen upon you.
For behold, darkness shall cover the earth,
and thick darkness the peoples;
but the Lord will arise upon you,
and his glory will be seen upon you.
And nations shall come to your light,
and kings to the brightness of your rising.
Isaiah 60:1-3 [1]

You don’t have to be a whole encyclopedia of current news and events. Or of timeless truths. Just show them how one thing they thought was true is actually false.

It’s like unravelling a sweater. It doesn’t matter where you start. Keep pulling any loose strand and it’s bound to disintegrate. It’s inevitable! Just find that one angle, and work it.

Who told the lie? Was it a trusted news anchor? A media personality? Can you show that they lied knowingly? That’s how you open Pandora’s Box!

We can perhaps forgive people who tell lies in ignorance. But someone who tells fiction, KNOWING it’s not true? Someone who deliberately misleads thousands or even millions of viewers? That’s a whole different story!

Telling a big lie on purpose invites us to question motivations.

So let’s pick one big lie, as an exercise. Pull out that one card, and watch the whole house of cards collapse!

Why does (insert their favorite media: Fox News, MSNBC, NPR, etc.) tell us Joe Biden is winning an election? The few times Joe emerged from the basement, his rallies were like a ghost town. There is no enthusiasm at all for a Biden presidency. Contrast with President Trump’s rallies. So much energy! Flash mobs assembled on short notice. A sea of red hats everywhere. Amazing energy! A 96 mile parade of “Trump cars” in Arizona. Hundreds of thousands who couldn’t get into the venue, livestreaming each event!

Why does MSM want us to believe Joe Biden is good for America? Why does MSM ignore a mountain of evidence on the Biden Crime Family’s ties to the Chinese Communist Party? [2] Wouldn’t a presidency blackmailed and controlled by China be THE most newsworthy headline? But we don’t see it. MSM won’t cover it.

So think about it! Why would the Big Six media empires want Americans to cringe at the idea of more liberty? To apologize for our values? To kow-tow to Chinese overlords? To relinquish our freedoms in favor of a dystopian nightmare? To raise taxes and wreck the economy, in a return to the squalor and hopelessness of the Obama years?

You see how it’s done? Pick your own example, something you are passionate about. Then keep tugging at that loose yarn.

Together, we expose the lies. Together, we kindle one another’s light. Together, we shall illuminate the path out of the swamp!

Fullsized image



2. Biden Crime Family Ties to Chinese Communist Party. , , , Rudy Giuliani’s Common Sense

Combatting the Attack on Traditional Values

Combatting the Attack on Traditional Values

by American Broadcasting CommUnity – ABCU|8

Traditional values promote the sound functioning of families and strengthen the fabric of society. [2] This is not complicated! Society is comprised of people with finite lifetimes. Thus, society must be continuously regenerated via reproduction to create new individuals.

How do babies acquire the cultural knowledge to mature into adults? They learn by imitation, plus overt teaching from elders.

For thousands of years, the best structure for children’s upbringing is identical to the basic unit of procreation: one male and one female, unified in purpose, and bonded by love into a stable nuclear family. Families are formed to support and nurture kids, and to educate them. Moreover, humans are biologically hard-wired to facilitate nuclear families. Marriage and family may not be for everyone, but it is the natural path for most. Henry Makow, Ph.D., writes, “A woman expresses love in terms of surrender, i.e. trust. She empowers her husband by accepting his leadership, and by believing in him. Women exchange power for love. They want to be dominated by their husband’s love.” “When a woman surrenders to her husband, she gives him the power to grant her wishes, or not. He does not exploit, control or dominate. He respects her individuality and freedom. He wants her to want to be his.He consults and nurtures. He makes the final decision. Every family needs a head. A creature with two heads is a monster.” [4] This is not a religious doctrine, but an accurate insight into human psychology.

Think of culture as a container for passing on the aggregate knowledge and experiences of past generations. It encompasses the social behavior and norms (acceptable conduct) of human societies, as well as the knowledge, beliefs, arts, laws, customs, capabilities, and habits of individuals in these groups. [3] And Western culture is the heritage of social norms, ethical values, traditional customs, belief systems, political systems, artifacts and technologies that originated in Europe, including countries whose histories are strongly connected to Europe by immigration, colonization, or influence. [5]

Ivory-tower academics and social justice warriors demanding automatic rejection of Western culture are really advocating the death of our society. It is ludicrous to expect each generation to reinvent agriculture, science, mathematics, literature, engineering, art, music, etc. from scratch every 20 years. Our vast cultural “memory” is what sets us apart from animals and savages. Instead of rejecting our culture, we should reject the insidious forces that are degrading it.

We are in the advanced stages of a long-term conspiracy to subvert Western civilization. 20th century “modernism” was a hoax designed to strip people of their familial, cultural and religious identity before enslaving them in a new dark age. [1] The central tactic is an anti-family agenda to dissolve the bonds of cohesiveness within society [1]. Social disintegration leads to psychological confusion [1] in which homosexual and transgender confusion are considered chic [4] and even admirable.

Feminism says women should become more like men, seizing tools like aggression and power, rather than employing feminine tools like subtlety and influence that respect men’s natural authority. This in turn robs [castrates] men of their natural role as protector and leader of a family. “Two people cannot become one if they have competing agendas.” [4]

Promiscuity and pornography destroy the intimacy that bonds a man and a woman. “Think of heterosexuality as monogamous and dedicated to rearing children; homosexuality as promiscuous and concerned with sex for its own sake. Porn is creating new generations of heterosexuals who behave like homosexuals” [6] I.e., promiscuously, without the intent to raise a family or pass on the cultural knowledge that underpins society’s continuation.

These and similar tactics cause women and men to reject one another, so that neither can get the love or stability needed for a fulfilling adult life. Without stable nuclear families, what few children are born lack guidance on their roles and responsibilities in society. This, in turn, engenders further cultural degradation.

The way forward is a return to our cultural roots. Founding groups should reassert their values and traditions as the common glue. Minorities should be welcomed, but we should not let them remake society in their own image. [1]

Above all, each person should reexamine their personal attitudes in light of traditional values, lest we inadvertently adopt enemy tactics as our own beliefs. We must study our own culture and embrace what is good in it. Understanding the attacks on Western civilization will enable us to counteract them. By taking our forebears’ wisdom to heart, and incorporating our ancestors’ virtues into our personal lives, we are on a path to rebuild society.


1. []


3. []

4. H. Makow, Wife Must Surrender to Husband to Reach Unity, []

5. []

6. H. Makow, Why All Porn is Gay, []



by Anon

The current battle over social media censorship can be traced back to origins in the CIA’s Project Mockingbird. This article will argue that Project Mockingbird did not terminate after the Cold War but continued when the dot-com bubble enabled social media tech giants to pick up the mantle and continue campaigns of social influence.

The dot-com bubble was not an organic phenomenon. It arose from a more sinister purpose: to achieve a complete takeover of worldwide media and suppress dissenting voices. By whom, you may ask? Did they succeed? We speculate that the bubble was deliberately created, and its entire trajectory planned, to give certain highly-placed insiders absolute control over what has arguably become our most key communications sector. Nowhere is that stranglehold more evident than in today’s battle over social media censorship that is playing out in the run-up to the 2020 presidential election.

But let’s start by examining the bubble as it is typically explained.

“The dot-com bubble was a stock market bubble caused by excessive speculation in Internet-related companies in the late 1990s, a period of massive growth in the use and adoption of the Internet.” [1] The Telecommunications Act of 1996 [2] was expected to generate profitable new technologies. Investors were eager to invest, at any valuation, in any Internet-related company. Venture capital flowed freely, and investment banks profiting from initial public offerings fueled additional speculation by encouraging investment in the sector. Investors overlooked traditional metrics—sky-high debt-to-equity ratios and negligible earnings per share—in hopes of cashing in. Stock prices kept levitating, as hot money rushed into the new sector in a speculative frenzy, creating a bubble that kept inflating. Media commentary hyping the potential of dot-com companies pervaded the airwaves.

Federal government assistance, in the form of venture capital, promoted dozens of key companies in the rapidly-expanding telecomm sector. The bubble made well-placed insiders instant billionaires, enabling them to secure present and future dominance over what has become the most influential communications sector.

Fullsized image


In-Q-Tel (formerly Peleus and In-Q-It) is a not-for-profit venture capital firm in Arlington, Virginia. It invests in high-tech companies for the sole purpose of equipping the Central Intelligence Agency, and other intelligence agencies, with the latest information technology. [3], [4]

IQT was conceived around 1998 as a new way for the CIA to acquire and fund new technologies useful to the national security mission. It was established as a legal entity in February, 1999.

“IQT identifies startups with potential for high impact on national security and works closely with them to deliver new capabilities that our government partners need to boost their technological edge.” Its own website declares that IQT invests in commercially-focused, venture capital-backed startups, identifying and adapting off-the-shelf products capable of deployment in 6 to 36 months. Currently it focuses on data analytics, cybersecurity, AI/machine learning, ubiquitous computing, IT solutions, communications, materials/electronics, the commercialization of space, power & energy, and biotechnology. [5] “IQT works side-by-side with the venture capital community to identify cutting-edge technology that has the potential for commercial success, but more importantly, the potential for high national security impact.”

This approach finds and delivers critical, innovative technology quickly and cost effectively. In-Q-Tel’s private-sector participation, funding, and acquisition of cutting-edge technologies is not necessarily sinister. Like any tool, technology has the potential for good or evil, depending on how it is used. But who has oversight over the independent nonprofit corporation besides its own board of directors?


Operation Mockingbird was a CIA program dating to circa World War II that enlisted journalists, American and worldwide, to spread propaganda—fake news—to manipulate public opinion. [6] (Sound familiar?) Mockingbird enlisted journalists and even clergy in intelligence-gathering roles. Cooperative media companies included CBS, Time, New York Times, ABC, NBC, AP, UPI, Reuters, Hearst Newspapers, Scripps‑Howard, Newsweek, Mutual Broadcasting System, Miami Herald, Saturday Evening Post and New York Herald‑Tribune.

Senator Frank Church’s April 1976 committee uncovered CIA ties to foreign and domestic news media. [7] It also brought to light the existence of the CIA’s infamous heart-attack gun. The Committee heard that former CIA director William Colby had instructed, in 1973, that “as a general policy, the Agency will not make any clandestine use of staff employees of U.S. publications which have a substantial impact or influence on public opinion.” In 1976, then-CIA Director George H. W. Bush announced that the CIA would no longer “enter into any paid or contractual relationship with any full-time or part-time news correspondent accredited by any U.S. news service, newspaper, periodical, radio or television network or station.” Those weasel-words do not rule out delegating such functions to subcontractors, affiliated entities, unaccredited writers, or the use of propaganda in specific instances rather than “as a general policy”.

Pulitzer Prize-winning author Carl Bernstein’s acclaimed exposé uncovering Operation Mockingbird was published in Rolling Stone on October 20, 1977. [8] Did these exposures end the clandestine program, or did it morph into a less-recognizable form? Has the drastic consolidation of media ownership and advent of social media simply become Mockingbird version 2?

How can the public ascertain if past CIA abuses have been rectified and are not occurring through, perhaps, its technology alter-ego IQT, or through public companies that sprang to life when infused with IQT venture capital? The Congressional committee with intelligence oversight responsibility, chaired by Rep. Adam Schiff, has shown it cannot be trusted. Mr. Schiff has lied about classified intelligence with which he was entrusted in his “Gang of Eight” [9] role. In the Trump administration, the CIA is under new management (directors Mike Pompeo, then Gina Haspel). The Director of National Intelligence, John Ratcliffe, is new in that role. Should the American people trust our national security organizations, in light of the long history of past abuses?

Today’s world, rife with fake news, and big tech collecting and selling user information to target the wary public, exhibits striking parallels.


Whose brilliant idea was it to create a honeypot so seductive, so ubiquitous, that people worldwide would commit all their significant life events, people connections, likes and dislikes, photographs, etc. to an online repository? Such a database would surely simplify intelligence-gathering. When the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) of the U.S. Department of Defense conceived the project, they called it LifeLog. Some posit that LifeLog simply burrowed underground by transforming itself into Facebook.

LifeLog’s 2003 bid solicitation proposed “an ontology-based (sub)system that captures, stores, and makes accessible the flow of one person’s experience in and interactions with the world”. It aimed to trace the threads of a person’s life by capturing “all of a subject’s experience, from phone numbers dialed and e-mails viewed to every breath taken, step made and place gone”. [10] It sought to compile a database of every activity and relationship, even credit card purchases, web sites visited, content of telephone calls, e-mails and instant messages, scans of hardcopies faxed or mailed, books and magazines read, television and radio selections, physical location recorded via wearable GPS sensors, and biomedical data from wearable sensors. The purpose was to identify “preferences, plans, goals, and other markers of intentionality” [11] – in other words, to anticipate everything that a person might do as a result of exercising their “free will”. If all causes and effects are identified, could an organization manipulate the causes in order to produce specific effects – i.e. to deprive people of their free will by manipulating everything they see and hear?

The LifeLog program was canceled in February, 2004. [12] In a peculiar “coincidence”, Facebook was launched on February 4, 2004. By 2009, it had become the world’s most used social networking service.[13] Can one prove that Facebook is the direct successor of LifeLog? Can one disprove it? You be the judge.


The existence of extreme censorship and exclusively left-leaning political bias by Big Tech is not debatable—despite testimony from Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, Apple CEO Tim Cook, Google CEO Sundar Pichai, and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg at a July 27, 2020 antitrust hearing, downplaying the practice with virtue-signalling and disingenuous statements on their commitment to serve users.

Insiders and whistleblowers have revealed administrative tools that Twitter uses for censorship. [14] This year Twitter officially admitted its controversial practice of shadowbanning—limiting the distribution or visibility of user posts in a way that’s difficult to detect—via updated terms of service.

Congressman Jim Jordan wrote to Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey in advance of the July 27th hearing seeking data on its censorship practices. “Recent actions suggest that Twitter is increasingly discriminating against conservative voices on its platform,” Jordan wrote. As an example, he cited President Trump’s tweet on absentee voting, which Twitter fact-checkers alleged to contain “potentially misleading information.” Jordan refuted the allegation with facts from the bipartisan Commission on Federal Election Reform, which stated as far back as 2005 that “absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud” in American elections. More recently, Obama’s Commission on Election Administration likewise found that “when [voter fraud] does occur, absentee ballots are often the method of choice.” [15]

Who knows which 3-letter agencies, or their black-budget counterparts, are still entrenched at CIA, In-Q-Tel, Facebook, Twitter, Google, or other social media giants—burrowed in deeply like a blood-sucking tick and lurking in the shadows, while subtly exerting control? Or even worse, have private entities totally outside of government oversight taken over the role of guiding society according to globalist goals?

It does appear that the CIA’s intentions, when it formed Project Mockingbird, were shady at best. Did the marriage of convenience with mainstream media giants turn into an abusive relationship in which MSM and Big Tech got the upper hand, sucking up the venture capital fertilizer and growing beyond expectations, a virtual Jack-and-the-Beanstalk? When examining covert programs, it is difficult to assess intent. Motivations are often concealed under layers of ambiguity and disinformation. It is conceivable, but not absolutely provable, that governmental intelligence-gathering did morph into the social media profiling that infests society today.

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act [16] protects online platforms from liability for their users’ posts. The key phrase says “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” This law has shielded platforms from suit, allowing them to moderate users’ content without responsibility for defamatory content.

With President Trump’s May 28, 2020 executive order [17] declaring internet companies “publishers” when they use their extraordinary powers to regulate speech and inject their own editorial bias by suppressing conservative speech, we are now seeing the next phase of information warfare play out.

The stranglehold that companies like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc. had over information flows played a huge role in political victories by the Radical Left, that resulted in the presidency of Barack Obama and the continued domination by globalist, big-government interests.

Will President Trump’s order to reassert Americans’ first-amendment right of free speech be effective in returning our society to a more balanced posture, where voices from both the Right and the Left have equal opportunities for debate and discourse? Will a new “truth ecosystem” like the American Broadcasting CommUnity (ABCU|8) be effective in freeing us from the oppressive media sector? Can Americans’ moribund acceptance of censorship be overturned through a resurrection of free speech, honest journalism, and courteous, lively debate?


1. Wikipedia, “The Dot-com bubble”,

2. Wikipedia,

3. Wikipedia, “In-Q-Tel”,

4. Central Intelligence Agency, “In-Q-Tel: A New Partnership Between the CIA and the Private Sector,”

5. IQT website,

6. Operation Mockingbird and the CIA’s History of Media Manipulation,

7. Full Documents of Operation Mockingbird,

8. Carl Bernstein, “The CIA and the Media”,

9. The Gang of Eight is a colloquial term for a set of eight leaders within the United States Congress who are briefed on classified intelligence matters by the executive branch.

10. NY Times, “Pentagon Explores a New Frontier In the World of Virtual Intelligence”, May 30, 2003.

11. “DARPA’s bid solicitation for LifeLog”, Internet Archive,

12., “15 Years Ago, the Military Tried to Record Whole Human Lives. It Ended Badly”,

13., “Who Invented Facebook?”,

14., “Leaked screenshots appear to show internal Twitter tool that can blacklist users from search and trends”,

15. Breitbart News, “Jim Jordan Demands Twitter Disclose ‘Extremely Alarming’ Censorship Practices”,

16. “Communications Decency Act”, 47 US Code §230,

17. White House, “Executive Order on Preventing Online Censorship,”

Cognitive Dissonance: The Deep State’s Last Stand?

Cognitive Dissonance: The Deep State’s Last Stand?

by Anon

Fullsized image

People are undergoing a severe existential crisis due to the coexistence—in an identical but impossibly incongruent space—of two opposing and competing sets of information. Both sets simultaneously claim a FACTUAL label, and both are presented by once-trusted mainstream media.

When “facts on the ground” do not match what trusted pundits (seen as “friends”) are saying, the traumatized human mind retreats into a powerful existential protective mode, compelled by the need to maintain even a false sense of sanity.

Friends and loved ones who have long trusted mainstream media pundits, believing them always truthful, are traumatized as it has become very clear, to the awakened, that MSM is lying about literally everything.

Those who continued to trust the MSM, those who cannot reconcile all the glaring externally-verifiable but contradictory “facts” with what MSM tells them, those who cannot fit the glaring contradictory facts-on-the-ground into the same mental space as the mendacious words of their beloved “pundits”, now find their precious but factually-deficient world view forced into an impossible contradiction. How can a trusted world view share mental space with outrageous lies?

They see only two ways to escape. The first will destroy their world view and change their lives forever. The second lets them to keep their flagging world view.

They could abandon their faith in MSM pundits (and along with it, their failing world view), and admit to existential devastation, and choose to see the truth. This would require admitting they have been lied to.

Some will cling to their failing reality at all costs, becoming completely and insanely blind to the obvious. Those whose trauma or fear exceeds their ability to choose the first path descend into cognitive dissonance, becoming blind to reality, no matter how glaring or obvious the incongruity. It is a type of temporary insanity.

Friends and family who witness their loved ones’ astounding descent into insanity should realize they are seeing a sort of crude mental or spiritual survival tactic—a product of our incredibly creative human minds.

For example, this mental survival tactic would serve an innocent child very well (temporarily at least), in allowing the child to survive horrific torture relatively unscathed, as far as visible scars go. In fact, this type of drastic emergency mental protective measure is precisely described by MKUltra mind control techniques and is well understood by the mainstream media, the Deep State, and the CIA. Torture is inflicted on a subject and then a mental “out” is provided to the victim by the torturer. The child chooses the “out” because it is their only means of escape. They can—mentally at least—float above their torture.

It is an example of devils forcing angels to use a last-resort tactic.

In every single MSM newscast, we now see the deliberate and calculated use by the Dark Forces of trauma, to force people into a state of cognitive dissonance. Smiling “friendly” icons purporting to be “allies” deliberately state things which even the most cursory examination of easily-observable truth demonstrates as false. Yet the lies are calmly stated with absolute conviction, behind masks resembling absolute, perfectly-manufactured false sincerity. (Juan on “The Five” with Greg Gutfield on Fox is a prime example of this.)

This forces anyone who hangs onto false hope straight into cognitive dissonance, effectively shutting down any information contradicting the desired narrative. And this is exactly the effect intended by those who are deliberately perpetrating the cognitive dissonance.

Now maybe you can understand why so many people appear to be insane these days.

DHS Study Sheds Light on COVID-19 Best Practices

DHS Study Sheds Light on COVID-19 Best Practices

by: Anon

In March and April, the Department of Homeland Security studied the effect of environmental conditions — temperature, light and humidity — on the COVID-19 virus. [1]

Bill Bryant, director of Science and Technology, presented the findings on April 23, 2020. [2], [3], [4] “Our most striking observation to date is the powerful effect that solar light appears to have on killing the virus — on surfaces and in the air. Increasing the temperature and humidity, or both, is generally less favorable to the virus.”

DHS studied virus survival on non-porous hard surfaces such as door handles and stainless steel. They also studied its survival in aerosols — saliva droplets from sneezes and coughs.

Virus survival is measured in terms of half-life: the interval in which half the virus particles are eliminated.

Fullsized image

Tests on non-porous surfaces:

· (A) On indoor surfaces with 20% (low) humidity and no sunlight, virus survived the longest, with a half-life of 18 hours.

· (B) Raising the humidity to 80% cut the half-life by two-thirds to 6 hours.

· (C) Then raising the temperature to 95°F cut half-life to 1 hour.

· (D) On surfaces in summer-like conditions of 70-75°F, 80% humidity and bright sunlight, half-life was sharply reduced to only 2 minutes. Virus was eliminated over 500 times faster compared with (A).

The same tests were done on respiratory droplets.

· (E) Half-life in aerosols, in 20% humidity, 70-75°F, and no sunlight, was around 60 minutes. That is, virus in aerosols disappeared 18 times faster than on indoor surfaces under conditions (A).

· (F) Adding summer-like sunlight cut the half-life down to about 1.5 minutes. Sunlight eliminated the virus 40 times faster than (E), and 720 times faster than (A).

The virus survives best on surfaces in dry indoor conditions. It does not survive as well in saliva droplets. And it dies the quickest in the presence of direct sunlight under these conditions. Summarizing the aerosol data, Mr. Bryan said, “in a room, 70 to 75 degrees, 20 percent humidity, low humidity, the half-life is about an hour. But you get outside, and it cuts down to a minute and a half. A very significant difference when it gets hit with UV rays. And, Mr. President, while there are many unknown links in the COVID-19 transmission chain, we believe these trends can support practical decision making to lower the risks associated with the virus.”

The data has stunning implications. It suggests that Americans worried about virus can benefit from spending more time outdoors in sunlight, humidity, and warm summer temperatures. It suggests that outdoor mask mandates and prohibition of normal summertime outdoor activities could promote the spread of virus, not contain it.

Mr. Bryan then discussed experiments on disinfecting environmental surfaces. “We’re also testing disinfectants readily available. We’ve tested bleach and isopropyl alcohol on the virus, specifically in saliva or in respiratory fluids. And I can tell you that bleach will kill the virus in five minutes; isopropyl alcohol will kill the virus in 30 seconds, and that’s with no manipulation, no rubbing — just spraying it on and letting it go. If you rub it, it goes away even faster. We’re also looking at other disinfectants, specifically looking at the COVID-19 virus in saliva.”

Fullsized image

· Heat and Humidity Suppress COVID-19 indoors and outdoors

· Move Activities Outside – sunlight impedes virus transmission

· Commonly Available Disinfectants (Bleach & Isopropyl Alcohol) work to kill the virus. (This third point depicting a spray bottle was obviously about disinfecting hard surfaces.)

The mainstream media spun the DHS presentation immediately. [5], [6] The study contradicted the globalists’ goal of forcing heathy individuals to stay indoors and refrain from normal summer activities, with a short-term goal of maximizing the death count and a long-term goal of justifying fraud-laden universal vote-by-mail this autumn.

One article assaulted Mr. Bryan’s integrity by calling him a “non-scientist” and attacking his military background.[7] The writer begs to differ: military background is relevant in defense against biological agents. DHS’s innovative multidisciplinary approach examines problems from all sides, whereas medical research limits itself to a narrow silo where the answer is always more expensive and profitable drugs.

The media instantly jumped on President Trump’s subsequent questions to Mr. Bryan and the task force doctors. The President asked two separate questions [9]:

(1) Whether light could somehow be introduced into the body to kill virus (it can, according to a new treatment protocol) [8]

(2) Whether research should investigate other potential ways to kill virus using disinfectants.

In light of DHS’s “best practices” slide, Mr. Trump’s disinfectant question was obviously about cleaning environmental surfaces. The press maliciously conflated the two separate questions to imply that the President wanted people injected with bleach. By twisting the President’s remarks, plainly intended to spur outside-the-box thinking, the media managed to almost completely sweep this groundbreaking research under the rug.

The First Amendment enshrines our right to discuss these matters freely and to form our own opinions on research that could have a bearing on our health.

In light of the data, shouldn’t we be spending plenty of time outside in sunlight, humidity, and heat, without a mask?


1. DHS initiating crucial research to mitigate COVID-19,


3. Virus does less well in sunlight and warm, humid conditions,

4. DHS Science and Technology Directorate collaborates with CDC, FDA, HHS, and DoD to study, characterize, analyze, and develop countermeasures for biological threats against the homeland

5. ‘Sunlight won’t magic its way into your lungs to fight coronavirus’: Scientists rubbish Donald Trump’s claim hitting the body with UV rays could cure the illness after President rolled out unscrutinised Homeland Security study claiming they kill the virus,

6. Coronavirus dies in SUNLIGHT in minutes, groundbreaking Homeland Security study claims,

7. Homeland Security official who detailed effect of temperature on coronavirus isn’t a scientist but has a long military background,

8. Cedars-Sinai-Developed ‘Healight’ Medical Device Platform Technology Being Studied as a Potential First-in-Class COVID-19 Treatment,

9. THE PRESIDENT: So I asked Bill a question that probably some of you are thinking of, if you’re totally into that world, which I find to be very interesting. So, supposing we hit the body with a tremendous — whether it’s ultraviolet or just very powerful light — and I think you said that that hasn’t been checked, but you’re going to test it. And then I said, supposing you brought the light inside the body, which you can do either through the skin or in some other way, and I think you said you’re going to test that too. It sounds interesting. ACTING UNDER SECRETARY BRYAN: We’ll get to the right folks who could. THE PRESIDENT: Right. And then I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in a minute. One minute. And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning. Because you see it gets in the lungs and it does a tremendous number on the lungs. So it would be interesting to check that. So, that, you’re going to have to use medical doctors with. But it sounds — it sounds interesting to me. So we’ll see. But the whole concept of the light, the way it kills it in one minute, that’s — that’s pretty powerful.

Burning Books One Word at a Time

Burning Books One Word at a Time

by: Anon

Fullsized image

These days our culture is pervaded by lies that are promoted as true. Daily, the Left introduces new distortions of language to support their latest ideology. The debasement of language is not accidental but purposeful. An insidious agenda underpins this trend.

People cannot make sound judgments without a pool of true facts to reason about. When deprived of facts, the resulting cognitive cage is no less a prison. The subversion of language could enslave our minds. Unless we are vigilant, America could be defeated not with a bang but a whimper.

Children quickly learn not to touch a hot stove, or suffer a burn. If new words were substituted, would touching the burner suddenly become safe for believers? Obviously not. Unpopular truths are facts disliked to the point of rejection. But disliking a fact does not make it any less true. Rejecting facts is a characteristic of mental illness. Liberal ideologues want to prohibit consideration of objective truths that do not fit their agenda. “Unpopular truths” are on the chopping block, to be replaced by new “politically correct” expressions.

The mainstream media parrot their globalist masters’ script, while universities and businesses pander to the same ideology. They hope incessant repetition will gain acceptance for the lies, and unpopular truths will be forgotten. We are told that “men” can have menstrual periods and bear children. That censorship of conservatives by Big Tech isn’t censorship, if it serves the interest of globalists. That cross-dressing or surgery changes a person’s sex. That burning down a federal courthouse is a peaceful demonstration. That corrupt and demented senior Joe Biden could run the country. That Islam is a religion of peace. That victimhood is a noble and desirable condition. And many believe.

Schools, libraries, and other publicly-funded institutions boost the new dogmas. Grotesque transvestites are presented as role models. Abhorrent sexual practices that our grandparents could never have imagined are introduced to first-graders by mandated “diversity” curricula. How can we teach our children right from wrong, when the TV mocks us for explaining that burning down public buildings and rioting are not good ways to solve problems? Should parents yield control over raising our children to cultural Marxists?

One of the most powerful neologisms is “hate speech”. This category is used to terrorize people into self-censorship. Once an idea is branded “hate speech”, those who speak it can be demonized and even prosecuted under unconstitutional laws. But “hate speech” is merely speech that others hate. Our First Amendment protects all speech: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” The only exceptions are inciting acts of violence or endangering the masses with one’s words.

What is at stake is only our free will, national independence, and right to personal uniqueness. We must not be coerced by “politically-correct” language bullies. We need to embrace the truth. While crying “diversity”, the globalists promote conformity. The trend to homogeneity of thought and language flouts everything that past generations of Americans fought to preserve. A free society is one in which vigorous debate flourishes, not the monoculture of ideas that the Left would compel under the insincere banner of “diversity”.

A splinter minority hopes to overrule the silent majority. And if we remain silent, they might. It is time to become vocal. Our Constitution empowers us with freedom of speech. We need to reject the lies and insist on the truth, in our private interactions and in all public discourse. We need to be loud. We need to overcome our reticence, and speak out. Truth is the only cure.

Joe Biden is a Rapist and I Want You to Vote for Him

Joe Biden is a Rapist and I Want You to Vote for Him

by John Cleer

The New York Times actually published this argument (wording it “I Believe Tara Reade. I’m voting for Joe Biden anyway … suck it up and make the utilitarian bargain”) in an Op-Ed ( 1 ) and by all appearances, they agree with it. Stranger yet, a good cross-section of their readers do, as evidenced in the Letters to the Editor ( 2 ) and by the lack of much push-back, if any, to the article.

But only two years ago, this same newspaper viciously attacked Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, publishing numerous articles ( 3 ) around the argument that there is an ethical obligation to “believe women” which makes Kavanaugh guilty, because he was accused by a woman. From there it followed that Kavanaugh must not be permitted to serve on the Supreme Court.

Now hold on, you might be saying, op-ed writers are not affiliated with the newspaper’s editorial board. This is technically true, but the writer Linda Hirshman has been a steady presence on the liberal circuit for years now and this includes the New York Times. They announced her daughter’s wedding in the Style section in 2003 ( 4 ) and have published Linda’s op-eds periodically for more than 10 years ( 5 ); longtime columnist David Brooks name-dropped her at the top of his column nearly 15 years ago, starting a public back-and-forth that generated publicity for her, an unknown writer, in the lead-up to her first book release. ( 6 ) The Times have since plugged all three of her books ( 7 ), which make the bestseller list now — she’s part of the club, thanks in part to David Brooks, and has had a long relationship with the “paper of record” that continued with this op-ed.

Katha Pollitt wrote an article for The Nation just like the Times’, and they too published it: “I would vote for Joe Biden even if I believed Reade’s account… I would vote for Joe Biden if he boiled babies and ate them.” ( 8 ) What if he boiled YOUR baby and ate it, Katha Pollitt? Would you vote for him then?

The Atlantic took a more honest step back before launching into the same: “Condemning Biden carries a clear cost for these groups. They believe that four more years of Trump would be immensely damaging for their policy agendas and for women in general,” leading in to another feminist writer explaining why she defends Biden against Reade and you should too. ( 9 ) “For women in general,” that is.

All three of these outlets pushed for Kavanaugh’s removal and yet today, all three are publishing reasons it’s different with Biden. Reade is lying, or they believe her but their political vision for the country (“beating Trump”) is more important. So Biden may be a rapist, and that’s ok now—sometimes that’s what women need, right New York Times?

This discrepancy is trending across the liberal media, who only two years ago would’ve called *you* a rapist if you wanted Kavanaugh’s accusations corroborated. Bloodthirsty, determined and certain of their moral high ground, the Left chanted “We Believe Her” (referring to his accuser Christine Blasey Ford, who says he tried to rape her 37 years ago) in unison, incessantly, for months. The year before, similar decades-old accusations were lobbed against Republican Senate candidate Roy Moore. If these people are truly concerned about the victims, then shouldn’t they apply this standard to both sides of the political aisle? Surely they’d agree that candidates for president should be held to it.

Don’t ask Joe Biden—he doesn’t always know he’s running for president. ( 10 ) But if he wins, “[his] first priority as president will be defeating Donald Trump.” ( 11 ) He’s forgotten what state he was in, on camera, in 3 different states in this campaign alone. Do reporters hold Biden accountable for these lapses, or do they surreptitiously ignore them? He’s forgotten what day of the week it is and even which half-century he’s in, telling parents to “make sure you have the record player on at night” for their kids. He’s forgotten what college he went to, claiming falsely he attended historically-black Delaware State when he attended the University of Delaware. He’s forgotten who was on the stage with him at a Democratic debate, saying in front of Kamala Harris that he was endorsed by the only African-American woman in the Senate. Astonishingly Biden’s even forgotten the Declaration of Independence, on stage in the midst of reciting it: “All men and women are created by the … you know … you know the thing.” ( 12 ) And every time he does it, he gets a pass.

In striking similarity, Ford doesn’t know what city she says she was almost raped in, what year it was, whose house it happened in or who was there with her. ( 13 ) Her only records are her therapist’s notes which were taken 30 years later and conflict with the year she gave the Washington Post as an estimation ( 14 ) (compared to Kavanaugh’s daily notes which are meticulous and taken in his own hand, in real time on the dates in question ( 15 )). None of the three witnesses Ford named can remember the party ( 16 )and one of them says “I don’t have any confidence in the story,” and can’t recall ever having met Kavanaugh. ( 17 )

Ford has also demonstrated a penchant for lying under oath, or at best remembering things in different ways than everyone else does. After she suggested that a polygraph test she’d taken proves she’s telling the truth, Ford’s ex-boyfriend wrote a letter to the Judiciary Committee disputing a number of her claims on the stand: in the six years he says they dated, she did not seem afraid of flying or enclosed spaces and more pertinently, she had indeed coached her friend on passing a polygraph test for a job opportunity. ( 18 )

“Dr. Ford explained in detail what to expect, how polygraphs worked and helped [her friend] McLean become familiar and less nervous about the exam. Dr. Ford was able to help because of her background in psychology,” he wrote in response to Ford’s claim on the stand that she had “never” “taken any other polygraphs in [her] life” or “had discussions with anyone besides [her] attorneys on how to take a polygraph,” nor had she “ever given tips or advice to anyone who was looking to take a polygraph test.” This would mean she not only perjured herself but is a studied or even professional liar, at least in regards to manipulating polygraphs. ( 19 )

Mr. Biden’s accuser, Tara Reade, claimed her mother called the Larry King Show after Tara left Biden’s office to talk about the alleged rape: this claim has been corroborated by the tape being found. Reade also has eight contemporaneous corroborating witnesses who confirmed her account. ( 20 ) So under the “Believe Women” mantra, which does not even require evidence, Mr. Biden’s cancellation should be a shoe-in.

But a funny thing is happening this time: instead of finding more victims to parade, the media can now only find staffers who will defend Biden. There were over 40 witnesses ready to testify negatively about Kavanaugh to the FBI ( 21 ), but for some reason with Biden, they can only find staffers who will sing his praise. PBS found 74 of them ( 22 ), opening their article by asserting he was not on a particular list of “creepy” senators, then conceding he was “also a toucher, seemingly oblivious to whether physical contact made some women uncomfortable.” You see, *he* didn’t make them uncomfortable, it was physical contact in general that did this, and in this case it just happened to come from Joe Biden. As PBS tells it, Mr. Biden was just being himself, and these women were touchy about it.

With Biden under the gun instead of Kavanaugh, the press is suddenly interested in evidence and credibility, and whether an allegation has any. “Believe Women” has become “we never meant ‘believe *all* women.’”

“That’s a Right-Wing trap!,” says the New York Times, and a “canard.” “Believe All Women” is the negation of “Believe Women,” wrote the writer, decrying it as a “double standard purity test.” But instead of disproving the double standard, the writer just says conservatives are hypocrites too. ( 23 )

Let me point out that this is very much a double standard (and a “canard” for that matter, if it’s possible to use the word honestly). Kavanaugh was convicted in the public forum by paid lobbyists of all stripes ( 24 ) who insisted that he was guilty, because otherwise you’d be calling Ford a liar. It was impossible that Ford could be lying, only a rapist would say that! But there is no parallel concern for Tara Reade—Politico for example published a hit piece characterizing her as “manipulative, deceitful” and desperate for money. ( 25 )

California prosecutors have even launched an investigation into whether she lied on the stand. What do they accuse her of lying about? Having graduated from college. ( 26 ) In other words, the supposed lie has nothing to do with her experience with Biden, and they are accusing her misleadingly—and using the power of the court to silence her, in order to protect the alleged rapist Mr. Biden.

It’s acceptable to treat Tara Reade like this because she’s accusing a Democrat. Conservatives get the Kavanaugh Treatment, where wildly unsubstantiated and relatively mild allegations are treated as fact and guilt is assumed. Kavanaugh allegedly “groped” Ford and tried to remove her clothes (no specifics given) and put his hand on her mouth as if to quiet her. ( 27 ) Clarence Thomas before him allegedly made unwelcome comments.

Joe Biden by contrast is accused of reaching under Reade’s skirt and jamming his fingers inside her ( 28 ), against her will, and then telling her “You’re nothing to me” as he walked away ( 29 ). Somehow the Kavanaugh and Thomas allegations were treated much more seriously than this. In Tara Reade’s case it’s even acceptable to say, “Joe Biden raped her and it doesn’t matter, we need to vote for him.” Imagine a reporter saying this about Blase Ford, in Supreme Court season, without losing their job and getting blacklisted. What happened to “We believe her”? It was a lie, Ford was a liar and everyone knew it. They knew she was lying and they used her.

The reality of these frenzied accusations and the “feminist” journalists who push them in the magazines, as the Atlantic briefly acknowledged ( 30 ), is they are political tools. Whoever runs the media has no problem defending a rapist, attacking a rape victim, or slandering a good man with false accusations, and their whore employees will do anything for a dollar.


1. “I Believe Tara Reade. I’m Voting for Joe Biden Anyway. The importance of owning an ugly moral choice.” Linda Hirshman, New York Times.





6. Ibid. 7. Ibid.

8. “We Should Take Women’s Accusations Seriously. But Tara Reade’s Fall Short.” Katha Pollit, The Nation.

9. “Is It Fair to Compare Joe Biden to Brett Kavanaugh? A candid conversation with the president of the National Women’s Law Center” Emma Green, The Atlantic.

10. (Biden says he’s running for Senate) “The Biden Gaffe Machine: A Running List Of Joe Biden’s Best Slip-Ups.” Tristan Justice, The Federalist.

11. “Joe Biden Gaffe: My First Priority as President Would Be to Defeat Trump.” Joshua Caplan, Breitbart.



14. “Ford attorneys offer notes from therapy in exchange for FBI interview. Brett Samuels, The Hill.

15. “Kavanaugh lawyer calls for accuser’s legal team to submit polygraph and therapist notes to Senate.” Gabriella Munoz, Washington Times.

16. “4 new witnesses for Christine Blasey Ford don’t really corroborate her claim against Kavanaugh.” Becket Adams, Examiner.

17. “‘Just didn’t make any sense’: Friend of Kavanaugh accuser Christine Blasey Ford now challenges her story” Jerry Dunleavy, Examiner.

18. “Report: Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s Ex-Boyfriend Says She Coached A Friend Before Taking A Polygraph Test.” Mike Brest, Daily Caller.

19. Ibid.

20. “Tara Reade Gets Another Corroborating Witness, Total Reaches 8.” John Nolte, Breitbart.

21. “FBI has not contacted dozens of potential sources in Kavanaugh investigation.” Caldwell & Przybyla, NBC News.

22. “What 74 former Biden staffers think about Tara Reade’s allegations.” Daniel Bush, PBS. 23. “Believe All Women’ Is a Right-Wing Trap.” Susan Faludi, New York Times.

24. (Advocacy groups raised seven-figure war chests, warning that Judge Kavanaugh poses an existential threat to abortion rights, the Affordable Care Act and checks on presidential power.) “‘So, So Jaded’: The Campaign to Stop Brett Kavanaugh Struggles for Liftoff.” Fandos & Edmondson, New York Times. (

25. “‘Manipulative, deceitful, user’: Tara Reade left a trail of aggrieved acquaintances.” Natasha Korecki, Politico.

26. “Biden sex assault accuser Tara Reade allegedly lied about her education, prompting a review of her expert witness work.” Nicole Darrah, The Sun.


(28.) “Biden accuser Tara Reade claims he pinned her to a wall and said ‘I want to f*** you’ – as she demands he exits race.” Chris Spargo, The Sun.

29. “The #MeToo hypocrites who’ve gone silent for Joe Biden.” Maureen Callahan, New York Post.

30. Green, The Atlantic.

Secretary of State Pompeo Signals Historic Shift in U.S.-China Relations

An OP-ED from ABCU|8 – The American Broadcasting CommUnity

Secretary of State Pompeo Signals Historic Shift in U.S.-China Relations

by Anon

Fullsized image

It will be up to future historians to judge President Richard M. Nixon’s “opening” of China fifty years ago. America was optimistic over the potential that Maoist China might adopt aspects of capitalism. We believed that with more interaction, China would become more like our liberal democracy. As Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said today, that course seemed inevitable – at the time.

The Vietnam war was still ongoing, and we college students wanted the war to end. Our male peers, after drawing a low number in the draft lottery, were sent overseas, their lives forever changed (or extinguished). So we were eager for the change that Nixon’s new Asia policy seemed to signal.

This philosophy has guided American presidents for many terms. They naively treated the country run by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) like a normal nation, trusting it to apply the rule of law internally, and uphold its agreements internationally. However, a realistic assessment by the Trump administration found otherwise. Only the blind or willfully ignorant couldn’t see that the CCP’s primary goal has always been to rip off other countries through every means possible, to gain advantage for China, with an ultimate goal of Chinese hegemony. [1]

President Donald Trump began the relationship with CCP Chairman Xi Jinpeng cordially. While they dined at Mar-a-Lago, we learned (with trepidation) that Trump sent a cruise missile to bomb an empty warehouse in Syria over chocolate cake. [2] It signalled that America’s new president meant business and had command of his military. Months later, Mr. and Mrs. Trump visited Beijing, receiving an honor never before afforded to any other nation’s leader: a visit inside the ancient Imperial City, once the home of Chinese emperors, where no commoner was allowed to tread. Trump continued praising Xi effusively – saving Xi’s “face” in front of his people, while leaving a generous opening for improved Chinese behavior. This seemed an auspicious start.

In late 2019, the Trump administration negotiated for a fair and reciprocal trade relationship with China, signing the historic Phase One Trade Agreement on January 15, 2020. [3] That very day, America got its first case of COVID-19 – an undesired Chinese import.

Yet many suspected trouble all along. In a February 2020 speech to the National Governors’ Association, Mr. Pompeo publicly outlined some concerns. [4] The CCP had targeted governors, grading each as “friendly,” “hardline,” or “ambiguous” on their willingness to cooperate with CCP goals. Under Xi, he said, “China is moving exactly in the opposite direction – more repression, more unfair competition, more predatory economic practices; indeed, a more aggressive military posture as well… The Chinese Government has been methodical… It’s assessed our vulnerabilities, and it’s decided to exploit our freedoms to gain advantage over us.”

Current news abounds with Chinese students and scientists, employees of the CCP People’s Liberation Army, being charged with espionage, intellectual property theft, and other crimes. [5] through [22] The charges are new, but such crimes continue a long-established Chinese pattern of exploiting American openness.

Defense Secretary Mark Esper, at the Munich Security Conference, said, “The prevailing notion of the day was that, if we allowed the PRC [People’s Republic of China] into the WTO [World Trade Organization] and other multilateral institutions, China would continue on its path of economic reform and eventually become a market-oriented trading partner. More broadly, increased engagement with the liberal world order would also spur political opening and help transform the PRC into a responsible global stakeholder. The more skeptical voices argued that, if granted membership, China would use the benefits of free trade and an open international order to grow its economy and access the technology required to build a strong military and security state capable of expanding the reach of their authoritarian rule. These were both credible arguments, but we all know which one is winning right now. It’s not the former. In fact, under President Xi’s rule, the Chinese Communist Party is heading even faster and further in the wrong direction – more internal repression, more predatory economic practices, more heavy-handedness, and most concerning for me, a more aggressive military posture.” [23, 24]

On July 16th, Attorney General William Barr, speaking to business leaders said, “The ultimate ambition of China’s rulers isn’t to trade with the United States. It is to raid the United States… If you’re an American business leader, appeasing the PRC may bring short term rewards, but in the end the PRC’s goal is to replace you.” [25] Yet many American companies kow-tow to CCP pressure.

It was the last straw when China abrogated all international norms by failing to notify other countries as soon as it learned of a “novel coronavirus” from Wuhan that has since swept the planet. The ensuing closures have wreaked unprecedented economic damage to America and our allies.

America’s new hard stance, bluntly confronting the CCP’s aggression and taking new measures to protect America from them, is a long-overdue reversal of past administrations’ failure to protect the American people from international predators.


1. Secretary of State Michael Pompeo, Speech at Richard Nixon Presidential Library, July 23, 2020.

2. The Guardian, “Trump told Xi of Syria strikes over ‘beautiful piece of chocolate cake'”,

3. The White House, “President Donald J. Trump is Signing a Landmark Phase One Trade Agreement with China”,

4. State Department, “U.S. States and the China Competition”,

5. U.S. Department of Justice, “Researchers Charged with Visa Fraud After Lying About Their Work for China’s People’s Liberation Army”,

6. The National Pulse, “Harvard Center Hypes Chinese Communist Party Popularity While Receiving MILLIONS From Chinese Govt and CCP-Linked Companies”,

7. Breitbart News, “U.S. Prosecutors: Fugitive Chinese Researcher Hiding in San Francisco Consulate”,

8. Business Insider, “People are burning documents at the Chinese Consulate in Houston, as Beijing says the US abruptly gave it 72 hours to shut it down”,

9. Fox News, “Rubio: Chinese consulate in Houston was ‘massive spy center'”,

10. Wired, “Chinese Hackers Charged in Decade-Long Crime and Spying Spree”,

11. Center for Security Policy, “Harvard professor’s arrest shows Chinese spying via US universities”,

12. Fox News, “Arkansas professor allegedly hid China ties to secure NASA grant money”,

13. Campus Reform, “Ohio professor the latest to be arrested over China ties”,

14. Newsweek, “UCLA Professor Stole Missile Secrets for China, Faces 219 Years in Prison”,

15. Tennessee Star, “UT Knoxville Professor Arrested, Charged for Double-Dealing with Chinese Government and NASA”,

16. USA Today, “Chinese professors among 6 charged with economic espionage”,

17. “Chinese professor in US convicted of stealing tech secrets, economic espionage”,

18. CNN, “US intelligence warns China is using student spies to steal secrets”,

19. Washington Times, “Spy school: Chinese military officer busted for posing as Boston University student”,

20. Washington Times, “China using students as spies”,

21. Voice of America, “Chinese College Students Being Forced to Spy on US”,

22. NBC News, “Education or espionage? A Chinese student takes his homework home to China”,

23. Remarks by Secretary of Defense Mark T. Esper,

24. NY Post, “China’s new ‘social credit system’ is a dystopian nightmare”,

25. Yahoo Finance, “‘China’s goal is to replace you’: Barr warns leaders of America’s biggest businesses”,

Are face masks effective in combating COVID-19?

Are face masks effective in combating COVID-19?

by G

Fullsized image

As the number of COVID-19 cases and deaths continues to change, governments all around the world create their own policies regarding the prevention of the novel coronavirus, such as social distancing and the controversial mask wearing. In some cases, you [1] or your business [2] can be fined for not obeying the law or even arrested [2], but what do government guides and the mainstream media have to say about this?

The guidance published by the U.K. government claims that only ‘symptomatic individuals’ should weak masks in order to reduce the risk of transmitting the virus and that ‘the best way to reduce any risk of infection is good hygiene and avoiding direct and close contact with any potentially infected person’ [3]. Additionally, the official U.K. ‘working safely during coronavirus’ guidance states that ‘the evidence suggests that wearing a face covering does not protect you, but it may protect others if you are infected but have not developed symptoms’ and that ‘it is important to know that the evidence of the benefit of using a face covering to protect others is weak and the effect is likely to be small, therefore face coverings are not a replacement for the other ways of managing risk, including minimising time spent in contact, using fixed teams and partnering for close-up work, and increasing hand and surface washing’ [4].

Moreover, the situation is not any different in the U.S. either. The FDA (Food and Drug Administration) says that it ‘does not recommend that the general public wear N95 respirators to protect themselves from respiratory diseases, including coronavirus (COVID-19)’ [6] and therefore ‘the best way to prevent illness is to avoid being exposed to this virus’. This, however, is supported by numerous sources, such as the California Department of Industrial Relations (Division of Occupational Safety & Health Publications Unit): ”Cloth face coverings do not protect against COVID -19” [8], the California Department of Health: “There is limited evidence to suggest that use of cloth face coverings by the public during a pandemic could help reduce disease transmission.” [9], the Neurosurgeon Dr. Russell Blaylock: ”There is no scientific evidence that masks are effective. If you are not sick, you should not wear a face mask.” [10], US Surgeon General Jerome Adams: ”Masks are not effective in preventing the general public from catching coronavirus.” [11] and even Dr. Anthony Fauci: “People should not be walking around wearing masks. Masks do not provide the protection people think they do.” [12]

Other sources that backed up the ineffectiveness of masks are the World Health Organization: ‘face masks do not stop healthy people from catching coronavirus and should only be worn by healthcare workers and patients’ [5] and the New England Journal of Medicine: “We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection.” [7].

On the other hand, covering your face comes with certain drawbacks, including reducing the ‘intake of oxygen, leading to carbon dioxide toxicity’ [13], an increased risk ‘if users reduce their use of strong defenses’ [9], taking away information ‘that makes it especially difficult for children to recognize others and read emotional signals’ [14], having an opposite effect ‘in the misuse of wearing a mask properly or fitting it properly’ [15] and oxygen deficiency caused by a rise in carbon dioxide [16].

Taking everything into account, scientific evidence suggests that masks are not very effective in combating COVID-19, so imposing strict rules is an exaggerated move from governments and punishments for not complying could be considered tyrannical.


















Additional sources:







Why COVID-19 Statistics Aren’t Credible

July 16, 2020

Why COVID-19 Statistics Aren’t Credible

Fullsized image

by Anon

The entire lockdown/mask narrative hinges on a daily rising case count—a hammer to bludgeon the entire population. If we understand how this statistic is produced, we can decide for ourselves if the numbers are believable. I’ll call the novel Chinese coronavirus discovered in 2019 “COVID-19”. [9]

Garbage in—Garbage Out

The CDC’s April 5, 2020 Interim Case Definition combines confirmed and probable cases. [3] [4] A case is “probable” if it meets a range of subjective criteria without confirmatory lab testing. E.g.:

—You had a cough and had contact with someone else who tested positive (including on an antibody test).

—You had a headache and felt feverish without taking your temperature, in a community with “sustained ongoing community transmission.”

—You might be counted twice if you later got a positive test result.

—You got a positive antibody test in a community deemed to be infected (more on test accuracy coming up).

—A doctor wrote COVID-19 on your death certificate but you were not tested.

This is poor science. The CDC should break out two categories—confirmed and probable—and state the criteria for each. If someone is counted as probable and later receives a positive test, they should not be counted twice. Pennsylvania, Texas, Georgia, and Vermont blend their data the same way. Virginia and Maine were too, but began separating their data. Combining PCR and antibody tests into a single heap vastly inflates the number of cases.[2] The old computing axiom—garbage in, garbage out—applies here. Statistics based on bad data are inherently faulty.

[Image: Discrepancies_In_Data_Reporting]

False positives

Pathologists haven’t identified any antibodies specific to the hypothesized pathogen, SARS-CoV-2. Without monoclonal antibodies, no one really knows what caused the illnesses attributed to it, or whether a pathogen was even present. No one has proven there is an infectious agent “SARS-CoV-2” that causes the same discrete disease in all the victims. Nor has a virus been isolated, reproduced and then shown to cause this discrete illness. [1]

Thus, the tests themselves are suspect: what exactly are they testing? The PCR tests do amplify a specific RNA fragment, but no one has shown whether that RNA fragment causes illness or is present in healthy people.

Anecdotes of test kit anomalies and false positives abound. A testing lab employee, baffled by an uptick in positives, bought 200 test kits. He made the kits appear tested without actually testing anyone, and submitted them to a competing lab. Over 50% of these unused kits turned up positive. [6] President John Magufuli of Tanzania, desiring to sanity-check the accuracy of tests, had a pawpaw fruit, a goat, and a quail tested; all tested positive. [7]

Financial motivations

Doctors and hospitals stand to gain by diagnosing inpatients with COVID-19. Medicare pays for inpatient hospital care using a diagnosis-related group (DRG) system. Hospitals classify patients based on the main diagnosis and treatment given. Medicare reimburses a flat amount per DRG code. For comparable respiratory conditions, Kaiser estimated that Medicare payments average $13,297 for a less severe hospitalization, versus $40,218 for a hospitalization involving ventilator treatment for 96+ hours. Moreover, the March 27, 2020 CARES stimulus package adds 20% to the Medicare reimbursement for COVID-19. [8]

Political motivations

Many incumbent governors continue to resist Donald Trump’s presidency. Anything supporting fraud-laden vote-by-mail is pushed. Anything to prolong draconian social control is pushed. Is there a possible third motive? Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s February 8, 2020 speech informed us that China’s wooing of American elected officials has not gone unnoticed. Is it possible that some governors are beholden to the Chinese Communist Party, perhaps subject to bribe or blackmail? [5]

At first people wondered if China tried to slam us with a ferocious bioweapon. The virus alone turned out to be a dud. The true weapon was not merely a virus, but a binary weapon that became far more lethal when employed to justify ruthless, unconstitutional social controls. Draconian social measures issued by CDC and elaborated by certain governors continue. Americans are still facing social distancing, mandatory masks, and brutal closure guidelines that have caused many business failures. Governors pushing COVID patients into nursing homes against CDC guidelines, while refraining from using hospital ships and field hospitals that were provided at great expense, resulted in unconscionable—and avoidable—death rates among the elderly. Contrast state measures prohibiting church attendance and singing, mandating mask wearing in public with drastic fines, and requiring school closures, with these same governors taking no action to prevent large uncontrolled public gatherings when the crowds’ purpose was to protest, riot, and demonstrate.

Light at the end of the tunnel

President Trump has just ordered hospitals to bypass the CDC and report COVID-19 data directly to the White House. This courageous action, bypassing compromised CDC bureaucrats, should facilitate reopening America and rebuilding our economy to surpass prior levels. [10]


[1] Global Research, “No One Has Died from the Coronavirus: Important revelations from Dr Stoian Alexov, President of the Bulgarian Pathology Association,”

[2] No More Fake News Blog, “Huge COVID case-counting deception at the CDC,”

[3] Center for Disease Control, “2020 Interim Case Definition,”

[4] Center for Disease Control, “Cases in the U.S.,”

[5] U.S. State Department, “U.S. States and the China Competition,”


[7] N.Y. Post, “Faulty coronavirus kits suspected as goat and fruit test positive in Tanzania,”

[8] Politifact, “Fact-check: Do hospitals get paid more to list patients as having coronavirus?”

[9] “SARS-CoV-2 And COVID-19: What’s The Difference?,”–25264

[10] CBS News, “Trump administration orders hospitals to bypass CDC in reporting COVID data,”

Editorial – Why I Fight.


by Anon

I fight because life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are worth fighting for. The founders’ ideals were right in 1776 and they are still right today.

I fight because our world has been changed for the worse over my lifetime. The dark agenda behind these changes is plainly seen, in comparing decades-old memories against the present. Experience brings perspective.

I fight for nieces and nephews, and their offspring, who would probably hate all that I stand for if they knew what I believe and do. (They don’t know I’m fighting to give them a better world, to return to them a goodly heritage and an opportunity for something better.)

I fight because I sincerely believe “the best is yet to come,” and that by reaching out our hand toward worthy goals, we can bring them closer, for all of us.

I fight because timelines are in play, and our individual thoughts can change the outcome.

I fight now, with all of my breath and strength, because when of age for military service, I had little interest in history or God or country. I did not serve my country then; my generation largely succumbed to set of false, externally-imposed ideas.

I fight because hating your own country is a losing proposition. If you don’t fight to improve the homeland that nurtured you, you’re no better than an animal.

I fight as one who from early childhood onward rejected others’ opinions and conclusions, examined things objectively, researched and thought for myself, and then acted upon my beliefs, regardless of the personal cost. I rejected the easy path and the easy answers. I always shunned the conventional because it only leads to mediocrity.

I fight because I believe important accomplishments require hard work and sacrifice, that everyone has the same opportunity to succeed, and that success is largely dependent on determination and hard work.

I fight because I know choices matter: that when one sees clearly, and makes up one’s mind firmly to seek a certain goal, and pursues it relentlessly, one can exceed all expectations, triumph over adversity, and achieve great victories.

I fight because honoring God requires loving all of his creation and striving to bring all of it into his light.

I fight because virtue, and honor, and righteousness are not mere empty words; they are real, and true, and worth fighting for.

Because I fight, I took the oath to uphold the Constitution and defend it against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

I fight because experience shows that my efforts can strongly affect whatever cause they are applied to. So to not do my utmost, while realizing that my every push could impact the outcome, would be a failure of the worst kind.

I fight for personal excellence, and competence, and mastery, of any subject I decide to pursue.

I fight because both success and adversity have taught that you must stand up for what you believe, and strive for your goals.

I fight because you don’t want to look back and say, if only I had tried a little harder… how are you going to explain that at the Judgment?

I fight, and write, because the lies are pervasive, and truth is the only antidote to lies.

I fight because I love you.

Will you join us? Will you help us fight for truth? Will you write, show, and tell?

Pedophiles are Predators


Pedophiles are Predators

by Anon, July 8, 2020

With the arrest of Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein is back in the news. [1],[2] Allegations that for decades, Maxwell obtained underage girls for Epstein and his high-profile guests to exploit—for purposes including blackmail—are widely known. Is blackmail why it took 24 years from the time the FBI knew of the allegations until the arrest? [9] But the problem runs much deeper.

It’s a touchy subject. Adults using children and infants for sexual gratification is a repugnant topic. Let’s not gloss over it: pedophiles are predators. No just society can excuse the predatory behavior of the sexual deviants who term themselves “child lovers” in a vain hope that society will overlook their cruel—and sometimes deadly—abuses. Severe punishment is required so they may no longer harm the most vulnerable among us.

The scope of the problem is uncertain, but according to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, some 800,000 children are reported missing each year in the United States—about 2,000 daily. [3],[4] Estimates vary domestically and internationally, and few reliable statistics are available.[5] We do know that under the Trump administration, law enforcement task forces have increased prosecutions at the state and federal level.[6] The Children’s Bureau estimates that the United States had over 678,000 cases of child abuse—9 per 1,000—in 2018.[7]

Many pedophiles even select careers giving access an endless stream of young victims. These include occupations most would never suspect—clergy, coaches, counselors, teachers, scout leaders—those we have trusted with our kids’ safety.

But what happens to these babies and kids? Where are they now? What happens when they are “used up”–too physically damaged and psychologically traumatized to satisfy adult perverts? You don’t want to know.

Does there really exist a black market for child sex slaves? Is there any truth to the allegations that sometimes Child Protective Services, foster care, and Amber Alerts are accessories to these crimes? Anecdotes abound.

Yet a shocking 2005 study showed that 79% of abusers were children’s own parents, followed by the parent’s unmarried partners. A whopping 40% of child victims (counting all forms of abuse) were abused by their mothers alone, and 17% by both parents. The study found that substance abuse accompanies 70% of child maltreatment cases.[8] Should child abuse prevention efforts focus on solving substance abuse? What about broader social trends that cause dissolution of families?

Parents shouldn’t be complacent. Turning a blind eye or downplaying the problem will not save our children. We all need to become more vigilant.

What is child pornography but depictions of abuse? Both those who create, and those who consume, digital depictions of child sex abuse should be severely punished. Demand for the “genre” has surged with the advent of broadband internet.

Sweeping the problem under the rug hasn’t worked. We need accurate statistics, education, and public awareness. The solution isn’t to normalize perversion, but to prosecute the deviants—both producers and consumers.

We don’t need new laws either. There are plenty of statutes which—if robustly enforced—could quickly end the menace of child sex abuse. We need adequate funding for law enforcement to investigate and prosecute the crimes, a commitment to equal justice, transparency, and harsh sentencing for those found guilty of violating the laws of God and mankind.


[1] Ghislaine Maxwell arrest: Armed agents, spy planes used to take down Epstein gal pal,

[2] DeutscheBank fined $150M for failure to monitor convicted sex offender Epstein’s suspicious payments,

[3] Missing Children in America: Unsolved Cases, ABC News, (2015)

[4] FBI, 2019 NCIC Missing Person and Unidentified Person Statistics,

[5] International Centre for Missing and Exploited Children, Missing Children’s Statistics,

[6] FBI’s Op. Kick Boxer leads to arrest of distributors, makers of child sex abuse materials,

[7] Child Abuse Statistics in the United States,

[8] Who Are the Perpetrators of Child Abuse?,

[9] FBI Knew Of Allegations Against Ghislaine Maxwell As Early As 1996, Accuser Says; It Took 24 Years To Arrest Her,

Was Donald Trump Targeted By The Deep State From The Beginning?

Was Donald Trump Targeted By The Deep State From The Beginning?

by Anon

July 1, 2020

Fullsized image

Donald J. Trump entered the 2016 U.S. presidential race, and at the time many people thought it was a joke. Gliding down the escalator, he joined the crowded field of Republican contenders as a true political outsider. Once again, he made for good TV. We tuned in to see how the businessman would fare against seasoned politicians. We cringed and snickered when he said, “Only Rosie O’Donnell.” Even Hillary Clinton was amused. She wanted to run against him. How hard could it be to beat a reality TV star?

But the outsider’s message of Drain The Swamp resonated with the American People. On the campaign trail, he pointed to common-sense topics such as a nation controlling its borders. And he highlighted the unequal justice applied to corrupt politicians, in particular the gross mishandling of classified information on Hillary Clinton’s private email server hosted in her residential bathroom on the open internet. He was a breath of fresh air for the people looking for a straight-talking candidate. The people may not like everything Donald Trump said, but they intuitively felt they could work with him.

Donald Trump faced fierce headwinds with national polls predicting a 2% chance of him winning. As his crowd size grew, the objections did too. “He’ll be too close to the button and will fire nukes at North Korea!” And the old standby, “The stock market will crash if you support this guy!” Against these odds, the first-time politician won the presidency. Hillary Clinton was in shock. Completely dumbfounded, the establishment never considered the possibility she could lose. But the people weighed in and voted for the true change they had hoped to get eight years prior.

In the run-up to the election, Trump had faced accusations made against him in a salacious Russian dossier funded by the Clinton campaign. [1] As he was preparing to enter office, the machine engaged to smear Trump with a Russian collusion narrative and calls for impeachment began. Incoming National Security Advisor, General Michael Flynn, was thrown into the mix when he asked the Russian ambassador not to allow the Obama administration to impede the incoming Trump administration. He pled guilty to lying to the FBI—a plea he later retracted. General Flynn and others involved in the Trump campaign were now involved in the setup, and the machine doubled-down on the Trump-Russian collusion narrative.

All of this came after years of Clinton coziness with Russia. Who can forget the cringe-worthy reset button Hillary Clinton presented to Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, or Bill Clinton’s $500,000 speeches, or the Uranium One scandal in which the Obama administration signed over 20% of US uranium production capacity to the mining arm of the Russian nuclear energy agency. [2], [3]

But now we’re supposed to believe Trump —the newcomer who had his hands full winning his first political campaign (the presidency)—colluded with Russia? Well, we didn’t, and after a nearly three-year investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller, he didn’t either. The Mueller investigation dominated the media for years, distracting our elected officials from working on behalf of the American people, and before it could even have been fully read, a new scandal came to town.

Enter the phone call with Ukrainian president Zelensky. [4] Upon congratulating the incoming president on his win, Trump asked Zelensky about “this whole situation with Ukraine.” Clearly becoming wiser to the true extent of the Swamp and finally being out from under the Mueller investigation, Trump asked Zelensky:

I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike… I guess you have one of your wealthy people… The server, they say Ukraine has it…

As a reminder, it has been alleged that Crowdstrike hid the DNC server in Ukraine—the one that was claimed to have been hacked. A weird place for a hired contractor to send your computer, wouldn’t you say?

We all know the Ukraine phone call led to impeachment and ultimate acquittal. But once again, the entire country was distracted by exaggerated allegations the Democrats knew would never pass the Senate.

The house impeached Donald Trump on December 19, 2019 but the Articles weren’t delivered to the Senate until January 15, 2020. An interesting coincidence, since this was the very same day the first COVID-19 patient took an indirect flight back to Washington and brought the coronavirus pandemic to American soil.

Trump responded by creating a task force led by Mike Pence, rallied American companies to quickly provide medical equipment to hot spots and replenish our depleted reserves, sent the Mercy and Comfort hospital ships to Los Angeles and New York, and shut down the country for several months to control the outbreak. And just as regions of the country were re-opening in a phased approach, George Floyd was killed by a Minneapolis cop, sparking widespread national protests.

People took to the streets with legitimate outcries, but Black Lives Matter and Antifa showed up as well, deploying to major U.S. cities to create chaos, instill fear, and destabilize our Republic. These bad actors overshadowed the peaceful protesters who sought justice for the black community. Well-intentioned people have been exploited by a well-organized insurgency that is now active in America.

Each crisis arrived on cue as Trump triumphed over its predecessor: Russia, Ukraine, COVID-19, BLM, Antifa.

Let’s tie it all together by going back to the beginning. Michael Flynn served as National Security Advisor for a mere three weeks, but spent three and a half years defending himself against Russian collusion after a career of defending our country in the United States Army. The charges against him were ultimately dropped and evidence collected in his case was recently declassified, proving Barack Obama and Joe Biden had in fact directed the intelligence community to spy on the Trump campaign.

Could it be? Did a sitting president weaponize the U.S. government against the next duly elected president? Did the Deep State machine rally to attack the incoming president for fear of having their past corrupt deeds exposed? Is that what the last four years have been about? Russia, Ukraine, COVID, BLM, Antifa. Were these events orchestrated to hide the fact that an American President and his shadow Deep State committed treason in an attempt to hide even bigger crimes and an increasing need to regain power?

They say hindsight is 2020. Review the evidence of the last four years for yourself. And you be the judge.


[1] Jason Le Miere: Trump ‘Pee Tape’ Dossier Researcher Tells Investigators He ‘Stands By’ Explosive Allegations About Russia Links,

[2] Peter Schweizer: Of the 13 (Bill) Clinton speeches that fetched $500,000 or more, only two occurred during the years his wife was not secretary of state.

[3] Eugene Kiely: The Facts on Uranium One,

[4] Read the Trump-Ukraine phone call readout,

[5] Noel King: 1st U.S. Case Of Coronavirus Confirmed In Washington State,



Fullsized image

To retain power, a chief tactic of the ruling class—those who fancy themselves the “global elite”—is dividing the masses. By creating labels and persuading us to identify with a label, we are taught to consider ourselves as victims in conflict with despised other groups, and to disregard the true oppressors, who long ago established the system of division for their own benefit. Generational age groups, gender, and sexual orientation have all been stereotyped and weaponized against us. But of all the labels, racial division is their most-used and most effective weapon.

Who are these self-annointed “overlords” and what are their goals? Elitist David Rockefeller addressed the Trilateral Commission in June, 1991: “We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries.”

And recently, they have turned up the heat.

The masses have a natural inclination to befriend one another and work collaboratively toward convenient, safe, and fair ways to satisfy our needs. However, the ruling class—owners of the sinister, propaganda-vomiting geyser known as the media—uses every subtle trick to sway opinions. Partitioning us into a series of tribal groups—race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, political orientation—is the hallmark of their divide-and-conquer tactics.

This insight provides needed perspective. Many events dominating the news cycle are fabricated, sensationalized, or intentionally pushed, with potential to stoke the fires of division and set people against one other. If they can channel our aggressive energy and get us to direct it at each other, they can remain in power. They hope we won’t suspect their supranational shadow-government fraternity of instigating the conflict.

These divisive events pop up every few weeks, like clockwork. Hollywood social engineers reinforce the insidious plan through films with racial undertones or politically divisive themes. The same films promote violence as the proper reaction to perceived victimhood.

Until we realize that we are being manipulated to direct aggression toward one another, the villainous elites will hold onto power. They believe they are superior to us in every way. They consider us like cattle, to be dominated, controlled, fenced, and culled, at their whim.

Their control will break when we refuse to be divided. Growing rejection of the division narrative portends well, for We the People are rising, and retaking our God-given right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Why the FBI Relied on Crowdstrike Examination of DNC Server after Alleged Russian Hack

Why the FBI Relied on Crowdstrike Examination of DNC Server after Alleged Russian Hack

by anon

“The FBI never requested access to the DNC’s computer servers,” wrote DNC deputy communications director Eric Walker. According to an unnamed intelligence official, no U.S. intelligence agency ever did its own forensic analysis on the hacked servers. FBI and Homeland Security relied on analysis by third-party security firm CrowdStrike, which investigated the breach for the DNC. [1]

Even that narrative is questionable. “[Former] FBI Director James Comey and [former] Homeland Security chief Jeh Johnson both testified to Congress about the DNC’s reluctance to cooperate in a case the Democrats nonetheless relentlessly hyped as tantamount to an act of war.” A week before Comey’s testimony, the DNC even blamed the FBI for having never requested access. Yet an unnamed senior FBI official contradicted the DNC the very next day, telling The Hill that “The FBI repeatedly stressed to DNC officials the necessity of obtaining direct access to servers and data, only to be rebuffed… This left the FBI no choice but to rely upon a third party for information.” [2]

In hindsight, isn’t it obvious that the whole procedure was highly irregular, especially in light of the extreme sensitivity of the “Russian election interference” allegation? Who directed the FBI to disregard procedure and not insist on doing a proper forensic exam of the DNC server—especially if the alleged “Russian hacking” was going to serve as a pretext to derail Donald Trump’s legitimate presidency?

The hacking of the DNC server is what initiated the entire Trump/Russia hoax. How can we trust the DNC or Obama administration officials—contradicting each other’s statements—on such a significant matter? Let’s review the events. [4]

—In testimony to the House Intelligence Committee, the DNC IT Director, Yared Tamene Wolde-Yohannes, stated that in September 2015, a [name-redacted] FBI agent first alerted him to potential nefarious activity on the DNC network. [6, p.7] However the DNC technology team could not detect the nefarious activity. That FBI agent contacted the DNC numerous times between then and December 2015 to report continued signs of suspicious activity. The agent said his information came from other operatives in the Intelligence Community. [6, p.12]

—The FBI eventually asked the DNC for 15 GB of metadata from the DNC servers, which was to be turned over on 4/29/16. [6, p.24] But on 4/28/16, the DNC’s information technology team discovered a cyberattack on their servers.

—On 5/1/16 the DNC, through their law firm Perkins-Coie, hired CrowdStrike, a private contractor, to examine the server. From that time onward, CrowdStrike took over all communications with the FBI on behalf of the DNC. [6, p.32]

—In response to questioning over Seth Rich, Tamene stated that the DNC found no unusual or unauthorized access by DNC personnel, but admitted that CrowdStrike was involved in the process of analysis [6, p.35] (Under contract to the DNC, did Crowdstrike in effect serve as a paid advocate to exonerate DNC personnel or advance a predetermined outcome?)

—Predictably, CrowdStrike concluded that the Russians were responsible.

—In mid-June, WikiLeaks announced they were in possession of emails damaging to Clinton. They did not say how they obtained the emails, but denied that Russia provided them.

—In a perplexing “coincidence”, Shawn Henry admitted that Crowdstrike had provided some “intelligence services to the FBI as part of a contract” in the past. [5, – p.74]. A search for CrowdStrike’s government contracts reveals a contract with the FBI from 7/8/2015 to 7/7/2016. [7] So while remediating the DNC network and advocating for the DNC in contacts with the FBI, CrowdStrike simultaneously had a contract with the FBI. The period when the FBI agent originally advised Director Tamene of ‘potential nefarious activity’ on the DNC network was concurrent with CrowdStrike providing intelligence to the FBI. Which unnamed Intelligence Community source was notifying the FBI agent of nefarious activity on the DNC servers—could it have been CrowdStrike itself? Shouldn’t the [name-redacted] FBI Agent be called to testify?

—In a further “coincidence”, IT Director Tamene’s legal counsel for the House Intelligence Committee testimony was Marc Elias of Perkins-Coie—the same law firm that technically hired CrowdStrike to work for the DNC. (Doesn’t Perkins-Coie’s representation of the DNC and CrowdStrike appear to be a conflict of interest?) But back to the timeline…

—The DNC refused to allow the FBI or Homeland Security anywhere near their server. In violation of every investigative norm, the FBI accepted CrowdStrike’s unverified redacted report, and passed it on to Mueller’s special counsel. In fact, the FBI never even saw the full report, but used it as a primary source to blame Russia anyway! [3]

—The New York Times wrote an article supporting the DNC version of the story. Then Comey’s FBI leaked information to bolster this narrative, and the Times ran a second story. —The DNC version of events got repeated so frequently and passionately that it became accepted as true.

In this way, through the knowing collusion of many individuals, criticism regarding the content of Hillary’s emails was deflected, and the seeds were sown for a false narrative that Russians wanted to bolster Trump’s election changes.

In Congressional testimony, CrowdStrike’s CEO Shaun Henry could not state unequivocally that Russians hacked the DNC server or exfiltrated data from it. “There are times when we can see data exfiltrated, and we can say conclusively. But in this case it appears it was set up to be exfiltrated, but we just don’t have the evidence that says it actually left.” [5] Yet upon this thinnest of predicates was based a circa-$32-million special counsel that failed to find wrongdoing by the President, an impeachment proceeding that concluded no wrongdoing by the President, and a relentless media narrative that for 3.5 years has attempted to unseat a duly-elected President.

Bottom line: While we do know that the 2016 Clinton Campaign and DNC paid for the discredited Steele Dossier, we still don’t know what data the DNC server held that the DNC hoped to hide from the FBI—data which remains hidden to this day. We don’t know exactly what acts of wrongdoing the Obama administration hoped to conceal from their employers, the American people. However, we do know that everyone in Mr. Obama’s cabinet used private Gmail addresses for surreptitious email communication, to knowingly evade federal records retention laws. We do know that the Steele dossier (which the FBI certified to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) as reliable, and upon which the Court relied in granting warrants that legitimized spying on candidate and President Donald Trump) contained nothing more than rumors and innuendo, and had been discredited by the FBI itself. After the FBI’s stunning malfeasance was revealed, FISC Chief Judge Boasberg censured the FBI, suggesting that prior cases might be overturned due to the FBI’s pattern of lacking candor. We do know that when the Crossfire Razor investigation regarding Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn was about to be closed for lack of evidence, the FBI’s Peter Strzok overrode agency decisions and insisted it remain open so they could frame Trump’s incoming National Security Advisor, Flynn.

Four years later, unanswered questions still abound. We must continue pressing for answers to unravel the bizarre and inexplicable behavior of the DNC, the FBI, and the Obama administration.


[1] (01/04/17)

[2] (2/14/20)

[3] (6/16/19)

[4] (5/8/20)

[5] Testimony of Shaun Henry (CrowdStrike CEO) to House Intelligence Committee (12/5/17),

[6] Testimony of Yared Tamene Wolde-Yohannes (DNC IT Director) to House Intelligence Committee (08/30/17),

[7] CrowdStrike contract with the FBI,

Congressional Display of “Solidarity with Protesters” Goes Horribly Wrong


Congressional Display of “Solidarity with Protesters” Goes Horribly Wrong

by Anon

Fullsized image

You may have seen them with heads bowed, draped in stoles of colorful African kente cloth. Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, Jerry Nadler*, and other Democrat leaders knelt in the marbled halls of Congress for 8 minutes, in solidarity with people protesting over the death of George Floyd. [1] (*Mr. Nadler stood, as he was unable to kneel.)

Wait– Something’s gone horribly wrong! This made-for-TV photo-op was an epic fail in three respects.

Kente cloth of Ashanti slave traders

Kente cloth is deeply intertwined with the history of the Ashanti nation. The Ashanti Empire (in Ghana, on today’s map), emerged in the 17th century. The costly cloth, associated with Ashanti royalty, was woven from silk imported via the trans-Saharan trade route connecting West Africa to Asia through the Middle East. The Ashanti people practiced human slavery (as did many others of that era). Slaves from Africa were sold and transported along the very same trade route as Asian silk. Thus, kente cloth is also a powerful symbol of an African tradition of black-on-black human slavery. [2], [3] At each State of the Union address, the Congressional Black Caucus and their Democrat allies flaunt the same kente cloth stoles. Is this a bad joke?

Cultural appropriation

Cultural appropriation is “the act of taking or using things from a culture that is not your own, especially without showing that you understand or respect this culture,” per the Cambridge Dictionary. “Cultural appropriation occurs when a more powerful person or institution projects the culture of a less powerful person,” wrote Dr. Luis Urrieta, professor of cultural studies at the University of Texas at Austin. He adds, “It also often involves obscuring or erasing the meaning behind the cultural item.” [4] It is undeniable that the Democrats’ display of kente cloth—ancient symbol of African Ashanti slave-trading elites—is a blatant example of “obscuring or erasing the meaning behind the cultural item.”

Reenacting the Oppressor Role

It is also curious that “taking a knee” has become a mandatory motif of progressive demonstrations. Curious, because of the deep symbolism that kneeling invokes. Those who watched disturbing video saw apparent victim George Floyd prone, with a policeman apparently kneeling on Floyd’s neck. By kneeling, Congressional Democrats symbolically reenacted the last scene of George Floyd’s life—only they took the role of oppressors. We Americans traditionally stand to honor our flag and our dignitaries; we kneel only in prayer. Our forebears soundly rejected Old World traditions of bowing to royalty in 1776, when 13 American colonies revolted against European royalty and asserted our God-given independence. Is the display of “taking a knee” poor taste, another bad joke, or perhaps they thought you wouldn’t notice?


[1] Kelen McBreen: Democrats Channel African Slave Traders In Kneeling BLM Photo Op,

[2] O.Ekeocha: Nigerian Woman Scolds Democrats for Exploiting her Kente Tribe Scarves,

[3] J.Achberger: Kente: Not Just Any Old Cloth,

[4] Samantha Grasso: A comprehensive guide to understanding cultural appropriation,

Special Treatment for Minority Students Could Backfire


Special Treatment for Minority Students Could Backfire

by anon

In the aftermath of rioting and looting that followed the death of George Floyd, there have been repeated calls to give black students unequal (preferential) treatment on university campuses nationwide. Is this a good policy, or will it have side-effects detrimental to blacks?

Students at the University of California at Los Angeles demanded postponement of final exams for black students. At UC San Diego, students and faculty argued for “universal passing grades for Black [sic] students in response to the death of George Floyd.” The University of Washington heard demands for a “gentle grading policy for Black [sic] students” in response to recent social unrest. UCLA Professor Gordon Klein merely asked the reasonable question of how a person’s racial background could even be determined, in light of online-only courses during the current semester. He was put on leave after rejecting the request to postpone finals for black students. Threats of violence ensued, necessitating police protection.

Let us entertain a thought-experiment. What if universities acceded to such demands and gave black students automatic passing grades during the current unrest (or any time)? The policy would quickly gain notoriety. Employers considering job applicants would become aware that a degree from University So-and-So has a different meaning if the candidate is black. The unfortunate victim of this double standard may or may not have actually attended courses or successfully completed a final exam. The degree is no longer an accurate metric of academic achievement. This puts the hiring manager into a difficult bind. Should they apply the same standard to all job applicants? Should they assume that all black graduates with the same degree as white graduates are less qualified? Might the employer be subject to claims of racial discrimination, if they prefer to hire graduates who actually attended class and actually passed final exams, rather than a rubber-stamp degree conferred under a “gentle grading policy”?

The most empowering policy is equal treatment for all people, rather than special treatment based upon a person’s skin color, racial identity, ethnicity, sex/gender, age, or any other physical characteristic. Hiring should be based upon merit rather than quotas. An empowering society is one that gives every person an equal chance to succeed, and rewards hard work and accomplishment.

Martin Luther King said that people should not be evaluated based on the color of their skin. Yet aren’t such demands a kind of reverse racism that asks us to do exactly that?


[1] UCLA Professor Placed on Leave After Refusing to Give Black Students Special Treatment (Postponement of Exams),

Is Voter Fraud Really an Issue?

Every American citizen, and especially new citizens, cherishes the right to vote for our elected officials, who we put in place to advocate for our interests and protect our liberties. Free and fair elections are critical to ensure that every citizen’s vote is counted correctly and that our voice, through our vote, is heard. Electoral and voter fraud cancels out our vote, and illegally takes away our natural right to vote for our government.

Most Americans don’t know the various types of voter fraud – impersonation at the polls, false registrations, duplicate voting, fraudulent use of absentee ballots, buying votes, illegal “assistance” at the polls, ineligible voting, altering the vote count, and ballot petition fraud. [1] That’s quite a long list of ways that our voices, as American citizens, are taken away.

Voter fraud is often portrayed as a contentious or controversial topic, but is it really? Is there evidence that it exists?

According to reports, four States had election fraud so bad that the outcomes were overturned: North Carolina, Florida, New York and Missouri, and gives fifteen separate instances where elections were overturned. [2] Various methods of voter fraud were used, including absentee ballot fraud, submission of illegal mail-in ballots and not counting provisional ballots, bribing voters and “tampering with absentee ballots” as well as illegally “assisting” at the polling location. There are other cases that involved non-residents being coerced into voting illegally.

Other methods of voter fraud involve ballots being cast for people who are dead or who have moved out of the state, which is made possible by localities and states not regularly reviewing their voter rolls. Judicial Watch, a government watchdog group, successfully argued in court that Los Angeles County must remove from it’s rolls “as many as 1.5 million inactive registered names that may be invalid.” [3] The court agreed. Los Angeles County was found to have more people on its voter rolls than it had eligible to vote (112%), which is a situation tailor made for voter fraud.

Whether or not we see it, voter fraud affects every American negatively because it take our choice away from us, and gives that choice -and our voice- to someone else. Americans are fair-minded people and all of us know this is not just morally wrong, but illegal and bad for our country. We rightly decry voter and electoral fraud in other countries, but unfortunately we have it here as well, and it is not limited to one party or in one state. We can all help in our own ways, from volunteering to work at a polling station to educating our fellow citizens, to making sure our own local voter rolls are up to date and accurate.





Should George Floyd Be Put on a Pedestal?

Should George Floyd Be Put on a Pedestal?

Despite all the observances memorializing George Floyd, you may not have heard the most relevant facts. Mr. Floyd was not the innocent victim that has been portrayed. As a narcotics user, porn star, and violent felon, is he really the kind of role model we want for our children?

Cause of Death: Fentanyl and Meth

Asphyxiation was NOT the cause of Mr. Floyd’s death. The Hennepin County Attorney stated that he “had underlying health conditions including coronary artery disease and hypertensive heart disease. The combined effects of [police restraint], his underlying health conditions, and any potential intoxicants in his system likely contributed to his death.” [1] The medical examiner found “no life-threatening injuries”. [2] Right away this undermines the police brutality narrative. The toxicology report reveals that Mr. Floyd was high on deadly narcotics at the time of death, with a fentanyl concentration of 11 ng/mL (four times a lethal dose), norfentanyl 5.6 ng/mL, methamphetamine 19 ng/mL, morphine 86 ng/mL, and marijuana metabolites. His blood also contained 4-ANPP, an impurity found in fentanyl preparations. From this, one might conclude that George Floyd killed himself!

Violent Criminal History

“What is not being told is the violent criminal history of George Floyd. The media will not air this,” police union president Bob Kroll told his members. [4] Mr. Floyd had been incarcerated for five years in 2009 for an assault and robbery, and had previously been behind bars 4 times for offenses ranging from theft with a firearm to drugs. [5]

Porn Star

Mr. Floyd also starred in numerous amateur porn videos using the name “Floyd The Landlord.” [3]

Meanwhile, other Black police officers died maintaining order during the ensuing riots, and their sacrifice has largely been ignored.

When was the last time we saw politicians kneel for a fallen police officer, soldier, fire fighter or first responder? Justice demands that we honor those who serve our communities by protecting life and property. The hero-worship of George Floyd is phony, contrived and misplaced.



[2] Hennepin County Medical Examiner’s Office Autopsy Report on deceased George Floyd, No. 20-3700 (6/3/2020)

[3] TheHabibShow.Com/YouPorn

[4] George Floyd had ‘violent criminal history’: Minneapolis police union chief